TSTP Solution File: SWC189-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SWC189-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:28:13 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 16 unt; 0 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 40 ( 15 equ; 23 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = X2
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X2)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssList(X4)
| app(app(app(X3,cons(X1,nil)),cons(X2,nil)),X4) != sk3 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
cnf(co1_13,negated_conjecture,
sk5 != sk6,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_13) ).
cnf(co1_12,negated_conjecture,
app(app(app(sk7,cons(sk5,nil)),cons(sk6,nil)),sk8) = sk1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_12) ).
cnf(co1_9,negated_conjecture,
ssItem(sk6),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).
cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
ssItem(sk5),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).
cnf(co1_11,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk8),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_11) ).
cnf(co1_10,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk7),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_10) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = X2
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X2)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssList(X4)
| app(app(app(X3,cons(X1,nil)),cons(X2,nil)),X4) != sk3 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = X2
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X2)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssList(X4)
| app(app(app(X3,cons(X1,nil)),cons(X2,nil)),X4) != sk3 ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
co1_6 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
sk5 != sk6,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = X2
| app(app(app(X3,cons(X1,nil)),cons(X2,nil)),X4) != sk1
| ~ ssItem(X2)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X4)
| ~ ssList(X3) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
app(app(app(sk7,cons(sk5,nil)),cons(sk6,nil)),sk8) = sk1,
co1_12 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
ssItem(sk6),
co1_9 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
ssItem(sk5),
co1_8 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk8),
co1_11 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk7),
co1_10 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
sk5 != sk6,
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_17])]),c_0_18]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.10 % Problem : SWC189-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.31 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % DateTime : Sun May 19 03:52:22 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.44 Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.47 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.16/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.47 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47 # new_bool_3 with pid 8248 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.16/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.47 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.47 # Search class: FHHSF-FFMM22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.47 # partial match(1): FHHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.47 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.47 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 8251 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.16/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.47 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.47 # Search class: FHHSF-FFMM22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.47 # partial match(1): FHHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.47 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.47 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47 # Preprocessing time : 0.006 s
% 0.16/0.47 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.47
% 0.16/0.47 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.47 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.47 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.47 # Parsed axioms : 198
% 0.16/0.47 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 168
% 0.16/0.47 # Initial clauses : 30
% 0.16/0.47 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Initial clauses in saturation : 30
% 0.16/0.47 # Processed clauses : 61
% 0.16/0.47 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.16/0.47 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # ...remaining for further processing : 59
% 0.16/0.47 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 6
% 0.16/0.47 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 0.16/0.47 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Generated clauses : 50
% 0.16/0.47 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 36
% 0.16/0.47 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Paramodulations : 43
% 0.16/0.47 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Equation resolutions : 8
% 0.16/0.47 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Total rewrite steps : 44
% 0.16/0.47 # ...of those cached : 35
% 0.16/0.47 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.47 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.47 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.47 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.47 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.47 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.47 # Current number of processed clauses : 26
% 0.16/0.47 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 11
% 0.16/0.47 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.16/0.47 # Non-unit-clauses : 14
% 0.16/0.47 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 30
% 0.16/0.47 # ...number of literals in the above : 123
% 0.16/0.47 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Current number of archived clauses : 32
% 0.16/0.47 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 129
% 0.16/0.47 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 38
% 0.16/0.47 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.16/0.47 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3469
% 0.16/0.47 # Search garbage collected termcells : 928
% 0.16/0.47
% 0.16/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.47 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.47 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.16/0.47 # Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.16/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 2076 pages
% 0.16/0.47
% 0.16/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.47 # User time : 0.011 s
% 0.16/0.47 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.16/0.47 # Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.16/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1872 pages
% 0.16/0.47 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------