TSTP Solution File: SWC158-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC158-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 21:59:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.90s 1.09s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SWC158-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 01:10:06 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.18/0.44 The process was started by sandbox2 on n023.cluster.edu,
% 0.18/0.44 Sun Jun 12 01:10:06 2022
% 0.18/0.44 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 17135.
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.18/0.44 set(auto).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.18/0.44 clear(print_given).
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 list(usable).
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.18/0.44 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.18/0.44 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.18/0.44 clauses in usable.
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.18/0.44 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 ------------> process usable:
% 0.18/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.18/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.18/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.18/0.44 141 back subsumes 140.
% 0.18/0.44 151 back subsumes 145.
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 ------------> process sos:
% 0.18/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 447 during input processing: 0 [copy,447,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.18/0.44 447 back subsumes 341.
% 0.18/0.44 447 back subsumes 284.
% 0.18/0.44 447 back subsumes 283.
% 0.18/0.44 447 back subsumes 282.
% 0.18/0.44 447 back subsumes 272.
% 0.18/0.44 447 back subsumes 259.
% 0.18/0.44 447 back subsumes 258.
% 0.18/0.44 447 back subsumes 257.
% 0.18/0.44 447 back subsumes 218.
% 0.18/0.44 447 back subsumes 206.
% 0.18/0.44 447 back subsumes 205.
% 0.18/0.44 447 back subsumes 204.
% 0.18/0.44 447 back subsumes 203.
% 0.18/0.44 447 back subsumes 186.
% 0.18/0.44 447 back subsumes 183.
% 0.18/0.44 447 back subsumes 181.
% 0.18/0.44 447 back subsumes 177.
% 0.18/0.44 447 back subsumes 174.
% 0.18/0.44 447 back subsumes 151.
% 0.18/0.44 447 back subsumes 150.
% 0.18/0.44 447 back subsumes 149.
% 0.18/0.44 447 back subsumes 148.
% 0.18/0.44 447 back subsumes 147.
% 0.18/0.44 447 back subsumes 139.
% 0.18/0.44 447 back subsumes 138.
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.50
% 0.18/0.50 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.50
% 0.18/0.50 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.50
% 0.18/0.50
% 0.18/0.50 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.50
% 0.18/0.50 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.50 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.50 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.50 number of clauses in intial UL: 337
% 0.18/0.50 number of clauses initially in problem: 413
% 0.18/0.50 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 81
% 0.18/0.50 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 91
% 0.18/0.50 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.50 absolute distinct symbol count: 80
% 0.18/0.50 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.18/0.50 distinct function count: 46
% 0.18/0.50 distinct constant count: 14
% 0.18/0.50
% 0.18/0.50 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.50
% 0.18/0.50
% 0.18/0.50
% 0.18/0.50 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.09 cons(skac3,app(sk1,nil))=app(cons(skac3,sk1),nil).
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.90/1.09 40 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 1277.3 K.
% 0.90/1.09 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.90/1.09 sym_ent ( 304) 190 0 190 0 56.4 K
% 0.90/1.09 term ( 32) 82802 77007 5795 7 181.3 K
% 0.90/1.09 rel ( 40) 60066 53787 6279 3 245.4 K
% 0.90/1.09 term_ptr ( 16) 24309 2432 21877 51 342.6 K
% 0.90/1.09 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.09 fpa_head ( 24) 2194 61 2133 4 50.1 K
% 0.90/1.09 fpa_tree ( 56) 12915 12915 0 21 1.1 K
% 0.90/1.09 context (1288) 17831 17831 0 11 13.8 K
% 0.90/1.09 trail ( 24) 102365 102365 0 6 0.1 K
% 0.90/1.09 imd_tree ( 32) 79 15 64 7 2.2 K
% 0.90/1.09 imd_pos (4024) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.09 is_tree ( 24) 1573 136 1437 33 34.5 K
% 0.90/1.09 is_pos (2424) 65125 65125 0 6 14.2 K
% 0.90/1.09 fsub_pos ( 16) 8855 8855 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.09 literal ( 32) 19448 15655 3793 0 118.5 K
% 0.90/1.09 clause ( 88) 3521 2556 965 0 82.9 K
% 0.90/1.09 list ( 272) 10 3 7 1 2.1 K
% 0.90/1.09 clash_nd ( 80) 6833 6833 0 9 0.7 K
% 0.90/1.09 clause_ptr ( 16) 894 121 773 4 12.1 K
% 0.90/1.09 int_ptr ( 16) 7872 4171 3701 0 57.8 K
% 0.90/1.09 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.09 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.09 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.09 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.09 formula( 40) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.09 formula_ptr( 16) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.09 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 0.90/1.09 0.00
% 0.90/1.09 print_cl time 0.00
% 0.90/1.09 conflict time 0.00
% 0.90/1.09 new demod time 0.00
% 0.90/1.09 post_process time 0.00
% 0.90/1.09 back demod time 0.00
% 0.90/1.09 back subsume 0.00
% 0.90/1.09 factor time 0.00
% 0.90/1.09 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.90/1.09 unindex time 0.00
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09 true clauses given 2 (28.6%)
% 0.90/1.09 false clauses given 5
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09 FALSE TRUE
% 0.90/1.09 2 6 6
% 0.90/1.09 3 38 7
% 0.90/1.09 4 12 3
% 0.90/1.09 5 1 1
% 0.90/1.09 6 3 0
% 0.90/1.09 7 0 23
% 0.90/1.09 9 0 19
% 0.90/1.09 11 0 35
% 0.90/1.09 12 0 26
% 0.90/1.09 13 0 24
% 0.90/1.09 14 0 8
% 0.90/1.09 15 0 22
% 0.90/1.09 16 0 13
% 0.90/1.09 17 0 11
% 0.90/1.09 19 0 5
% 0.90/1.09 21 0 16
% 0.90/1.09 22 0 9
% 0.90/1.09 23 0 7
% 0.90/1.09 25 0 1
% 0.90/1.09 tot: 60 236 (79.7% true)
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.90/1.09 1:0 2:0 3:2 4:0 5:11 6:0 7:4 8:0 9:6 10:47
% 0.90/1.09 11:6 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:1
% 0.90/1.09 21:0 22:0 23:1 24:1 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 0.90/1.09 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 0.90/1.09 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 0.90/1.09 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:1 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:1
% 0.90/1.09 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:1 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 0.90/1.09 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 0.90/1.09 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 0.90/1.09 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 0.90/1.09 All others: 577.
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------