TSTP Solution File: SWC153-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SWC153-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:11:26 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.47s 1.17s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 41 ( 21 unt; 0 nHn; 41 RR)
% Number of literals : 128 ( 9 equ; 90 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 38 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
cnf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(app(app(X0,cons(X1,nil)),X2),cons(X3,nil)),X4) != sk3
| ~ leq(X3,X1)
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X4)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X3)
| leq(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
cnf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(app(app(X0,cons(X1,nil)),X2),cons(X3,nil)),X4) != sk3
| ~ leq(X3,X1)
| ~ memberP(X2,X5)
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X4)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X3)
| ~ ssItem(X5)
| leq(X1,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).
cnf(c_57,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(app(app(X0,cons(X1,nil)),X2),cons(X3,nil)),X4) != sk3
| ~ leq(X3,X1)
| ~ memberP(X2,X5)
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X4)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X3)
| ~ ssItem(X5)
| leq(X5,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).
cnf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
ssItem(sk5),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_10) ).
cnf(c_59,negated_conjecture,
ssItem(sk6),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_11) ).
cnf(c_60,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk7),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_12) ).
cnf(c_61,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk8),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_13) ).
cnf(c_62,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk9),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_14) ).
cnf(c_63,negated_conjecture,
app(app(app(app(sk7,cons(sk5,nil)),sk8),cons(sk6,nil)),sk9) = sk1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_15) ).
cnf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
leq(sk6,sk5),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_16) ).
cnf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
( ~ leq(sk5,sk6)
| ssItem(sk10) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_17) ).
cnf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
( ~ leq(sk5,sk6)
| memberP(sk8,sk10) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_18) ).
cnf(c_67,negated_conjecture,
( ~ leq(sk5,sk6)
| ~ leq(sk5,sk10)
| ~ leq(sk10,sk6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_19) ).
cnf(c_1941,plain,
app(app(app(app(sk7,cons(sk5,nil)),sk8),cons(sk6,nil)),sk9) = sk3,
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_54]) ).
cnf(c_6578,negated_conjecture,
( ~ leq(sk5,sk6)
| ~ leq(sk5,sk10)
| ~ leq(sk10,sk6) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_67]) ).
cnf(c_6579,negated_conjecture,
( ~ leq(sk5,sk6)
| memberP(sk8,sk10) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_66]) ).
cnf(c_6580,negated_conjecture,
( ~ leq(sk5,sk6)
| ssItem(sk10) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_65]) ).
cnf(c_6581,negated_conjecture,
leq(sk6,sk5),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_64]) ).
cnf(c_6582,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk9),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_62]) ).
cnf(c_6583,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk8),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_61]) ).
cnf(c_6584,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk7),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_60]) ).
cnf(c_6585,negated_conjecture,
ssItem(sk6),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_59]) ).
cnf(c_6586,negated_conjecture,
ssItem(sk5),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_58]) ).
cnf(c_6587,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(app(app(X0,cons(X1,nil)),X2),cons(X3,nil)),X4) != sk3
| ~ leq(X3,X1)
| ~ memberP(X2,X5)
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X4)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X3)
| ~ ssItem(X5)
| leq(X5,X3) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_57]) ).
cnf(c_6588,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(app(app(X0,cons(X1,nil)),X2),cons(X3,nil)),X4) != sk3
| ~ leq(X3,X1)
| ~ memberP(X2,X5)
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X4)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X3)
| ~ ssItem(X5)
| leq(X1,X5) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_56]) ).
cnf(c_6589,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(app(app(X0,cons(X1,nil)),X2),cons(X3,nil)),X4) != sk3
| ~ leq(X3,X1)
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X4)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X3)
| leq(X1,X3) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_55]) ).
cnf(c_9317,plain,
( ~ memberP(sk8,X0)
| ~ leq(sk6,sk5)
| ~ ssItem(X0)
| ~ ssList(sk7)
| ~ ssList(sk8)
| ~ ssList(sk9)
| ~ ssItem(sk5)
| ~ ssItem(sk6)
| leq(sk5,X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1941,c_6588]) ).
cnf(c_9318,plain,
( ~ memberP(sk8,X0)
| ~ leq(sk6,sk5)
| ~ ssItem(X0)
| ~ ssList(sk7)
| ~ ssList(sk8)
| ~ ssList(sk9)
| ~ ssItem(sk5)
| ~ ssItem(sk6)
| leq(X0,sk6) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1941,c_6587]) ).
cnf(c_9319,plain,
( ~ leq(sk6,sk5)
| ~ ssList(sk7)
| ~ ssList(sk8)
| ~ ssList(sk9)
| ~ ssItem(sk5)
| ~ ssItem(sk6)
| leq(sk5,sk6) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1941,c_6589]) ).
cnf(c_9320,plain,
leq(sk5,sk6),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_9319,c_6585,c_6586,c_6582,c_6583,c_6584,c_6581]) ).
cnf(c_9321,plain,
( ~ memberP(sk8,X0)
| ~ ssItem(X0)
| leq(X0,sk6) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_9318,c_6585,c_6586,c_6582,c_6583,c_6584,c_6581]) ).
cnf(c_9325,plain,
( ~ memberP(sk8,X0)
| ~ ssItem(X0)
| leq(sk5,X0) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_9317,c_6585,c_6586,c_6582,c_6583,c_6584,c_6581]) ).
cnf(c_9354,plain,
( ~ leq(sk5,sk10)
| ~ leq(sk10,sk6) ),
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6578,c_9320]) ).
cnf(c_9355,plain,
memberP(sk8,sk10),
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6579,c_9320]) ).
cnf(c_9356,plain,
ssItem(sk10),
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6580,c_9320]) ).
cnf(c_9376,plain,
( ~ ssItem(sk10)
| leq(sk10,sk6) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_9355,c_9321]) ).
cnf(c_9377,plain,
leq(sk10,sk6),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_9376,c_9356]) ).
cnf(c_9385,plain,
( ~ ssItem(sk10)
| leq(sk5,sk10) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_9355,c_9325]) ).
cnf(c_9386,plain,
leq(sk5,sk10),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_9385,c_9356]) ).
cnf(c_9387,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_9386,c_9377,c_9354]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13 % Problem : SWC153-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.14 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu May 2 23:41:43 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.47/1.17 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/1.17 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/1.17
% 0.47/1.17 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.47/1.17
% 0.47/1.17 ------ iProver source info
% 0.47/1.17
% 0.47/1.17 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 0.47/1.17 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 0.47/1.17 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.47/1.17
% 0.47/1.17 ------ Parsing...successful
% 0.47/1.17
% 0.47/1.17
% 0.47/1.17
% 0.47/1.17 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 5 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 0.47/1.17
% 0.47/1.17 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 2 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 0.47/1.17
% 0.47/1.17 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 0.47/1.17 ------ Proving...
% 0.47/1.17 ------ Problem Properties
% 0.47/1.17
% 0.47/1.17
% 0.47/1.17 clauses 194
% 0.47/1.17 conjectures 16
% 0.47/1.17 EPR 65
% 0.47/1.17 Horn 166
% 0.47/1.17 unary 69
% 0.47/1.17 binary 23
% 0.47/1.17 lits 587
% 0.47/1.17 lits eq 75
% 0.47/1.17 fd_pure 0
% 0.47/1.17 fd_pseudo 0
% 0.47/1.17 fd_cond 15
% 0.47/1.17 fd_pseudo_cond 14
% 0.47/1.17 AC symbols 0
% 0.47/1.17
% 0.47/1.17 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 0.47/1.17
% 0.47/1.17 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.47/1.17
% 0.47/1.17
% 0.47/1.17 ------
% 0.47/1.17 Current options:
% 0.47/1.17 ------
% 0.47/1.17
% 0.47/1.17
% 0.47/1.17
% 0.47/1.17
% 0.47/1.17 ------ Proving...
% 0.47/1.17
% 0.47/1.17
% 0.47/1.17 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/1.17
% 0.47/1.17 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.47/1.17
% 0.47/1.17
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------