TSTP Solution File: SWC147+1 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : SWC147+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:39:06 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.46s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  110 (  27 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   18 (   7 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  127 (  31   ~;   8   |;  76   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   9 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   8   !;  24   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f164,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f158,f139]) ).

fof(f139,plain,
    neq(sK2,nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f119]) ).

fof(f119,plain,
    ( ssList(sK1)
    & ssList(sK3)
    & ssList(sK4)
    & neq(sK2,nil)
    & sK4 = sK2
    & sK1 = sK3
    & ~ singletonP(sK2)
    & ~ neq(sK4,nil)
    & ssList(sK2) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4])],[f104,f118,f117,f116,f115]) ).

fof(f115,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
        & ? [X1] :
            ( ? [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
                & ? [X3] :
                    ( ssList(X3)
                    & neq(X1,nil)
                    & X1 = X3
                    & X0 = X2
                    & ~ singletonP(X1)
                    & ~ neq(X3,nil) ) )
            & ssList(X1) ) )
   => ( ssList(sK1)
      & ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
              & ? [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                  & neq(X1,nil)
                  & X1 = X3
                  & sK1 = X2
                  & ~ singletonP(X1)
                  & ~ neq(X3,nil) ) )
          & ssList(X1) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f116,plain,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( ? [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
            & ? [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
                & neq(X1,nil)
                & X1 = X3
                & sK1 = X2
                & ~ singletonP(X1)
                & ~ neq(X3,nil) ) )
        & ssList(X1) )
   => ( ? [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
          & ? [X3] :
              ( ssList(X3)
              & neq(sK2,nil)
              & sK2 = X3
              & sK1 = X2
              & ~ singletonP(sK2)
              & ~ neq(X3,nil) ) )
      & ssList(sK2) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f117,plain,
    ( ? [X2] :
        ( ssList(X2)
        & ? [X3] :
            ( ssList(X3)
            & neq(sK2,nil)
            & sK2 = X3
            & sK1 = X2
            & ~ singletonP(sK2)
            & ~ neq(X3,nil) ) )
   => ( ssList(sK3)
      & ? [X3] :
          ( ssList(X3)
          & neq(sK2,nil)
          & sK2 = X3
          & sK1 = sK3
          & ~ singletonP(sK2)
          & ~ neq(X3,nil) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f118,plain,
    ( ? [X3] :
        ( ssList(X3)
        & neq(sK2,nil)
        & sK2 = X3
        & sK1 = sK3
        & ~ singletonP(sK2)
        & ~ neq(X3,nil) )
   => ( ssList(sK4)
      & neq(sK2,nil)
      & sK4 = sK2
      & sK1 = sK3
      & ~ singletonP(sK2)
      & ~ neq(sK4,nil) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f104,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
      & ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
              & ? [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                  & neq(X1,nil)
                  & X1 = X3
                  & X0 = X2
                  & ~ singletonP(X1)
                  & ~ neq(X3,nil) ) )
          & ssList(X1) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f103]) ).

fof(f103,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( X0 = X2
                  & neq(X1,nil)
                  & ~ singletonP(X1)
                  & ~ neq(X3,nil)
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ssList(X3)
                   => ( X0 != X2
                      | ~ neq(X1,nil)
                      | singletonP(X1)
                      | neq(X3,nil)
                      | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                 => ( X0 != X2
                    | ~ neq(X1,nil)
                    | singletonP(X1)
                    | neq(X3,nil)
                    | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(f158,plain,
    ~ neq(sK2,nil),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f135,f138]) ).

fof(f138,plain,
    sK4 = sK2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f119]) ).

fof(f135,plain,
    ~ neq(sK4,nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f119]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SWC147+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 18:49:31 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.45  % (32329)lrs+10_1:2_br=off:nm=4:ss=included:urr=on:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.19/0.45  % (32329)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.46  % (32329)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.46  % (32329)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46  % (32329)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.46  % (32329)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.46  % (32329)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  % (32329)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 0.19/0.46  % (32329)Time elapsed: 0.008 s
% 0.19/0.46  % (32329)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.19/0.46  % (32329)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46  % (32329)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46  % (32308)Success in time 0.107 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------