TSTP Solution File: SWC139+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : SWC139+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:41:58 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.50s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   37 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   38 (  10   ~;   6   |;  14   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   8   !;   8   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f479,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[],[f421,f327]) ).

fof(f327,plain,
    ~ neq(sK28,nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f171]) ).

fof(f171,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
          & ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                  & X1 = X3
                  & neq(X1,nil)
                  & X0 = X2
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) ) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f170]) ).

fof(f170,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( X1 = X3
                  & X0 = X2
                  & ~ neq(X3,nil)
                  & neq(X1,nil)
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ssList(X3)
                   => ( X1 != X3
                      | X0 != X2
                      | neq(X3,nil)
                      | ~ neq(X1,nil) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                 => ( X1 != X3
                    | X0 != X2
                    | neq(X3,nil)
                    | ~ neq(X1,nil) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(f421,plain,
    neq(sK28,nil),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f325,f326]) ).

fof(f326,plain,
    sK26 = sK28,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f171]) ).

fof(f325,plain,
    neq(sK26,nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f171]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem    : SWC139+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 18:21:26 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.48  % (28121)ott+11_1:1_drc=off:nwc=5.0:slsq=on:slsqc=1:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=467:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/467Mi)
% 0.18/0.48  % (28113)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=75:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.18/0.49  % (28101)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.18/0.49  % (28111)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.18/0.49  % (28110)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/101Mi)
% 0.18/0.49  % (28116)ott+10_1:1_tgt=ground:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.18/0.49  % (28101)First to succeed.
% 0.18/0.49  % (28124)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.18/0.50  % (28100)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.18/0.50  % (28105)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.18/0.50  % (28121)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.18/0.50  % (28101)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.18/0.50  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.50  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.50  % (28101)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.50  % (28101)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.18/0.50  % (28101)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.18/0.50  % (28101)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.18/0.50  
% 0.18/0.50  % (28101)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.18/0.50  % (28101)Time elapsed: 0.116 s
% 0.18/0.50  % (28101)Instructions burned: 12 (million)
% 0.18/0.50  % (28101)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.50  % (28101)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.50  % (28095)Success in time 0.167 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------