TSTP Solution File: SWC136+1 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : SWC136+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:49:51 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 13.16s 2.53s
% Output : Proof 20.06s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SWC136+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 16:58:25 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.60 ________ _____
% 0.20/0.60 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.20/0.60 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.20/0.60 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.20/0.60 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.20/0.60 (2023-06-19)
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.20/0.60 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.20/0.60 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.20/0.60 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.20/0.62 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.20/0.63 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.20/0.63 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.20/0.63 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.20/0.63 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.20/0.63 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.20/0.63 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.20/0.63 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 5.73/1.47 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 5.73/1.49 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 5.73/1.50 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 5.73/1.50 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 5.73/1.50 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 5.73/1.50 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 5.73/1.50 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 13.16/2.50 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.16/2.53 Prover 2: proved (1901ms)
% 13.16/2.53
% 13.16/2.53 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 13.16/2.53
% 13.16/2.54 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 14.48/2.71 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 14.48/2.71 Prover 5: stopped
% 14.48/2.71 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 15.42/2.81 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 15.42/2.81 Prover 3: stopped
% 15.42/2.83 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 15.42/2.83 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 15.97/2.85 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 15.97/2.85 Prover 6: stopped
% 15.97/2.87 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 16.61/2.96 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 16.61/2.98 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 16.61/2.99 Prover 1: Found proof (size 1)
% 16.61/2.99 Prover 1: proved (2361ms)
% 17.04/3.01 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 17.04/3.06 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 17.77/3.11 Prover 10: stopped
% 18.12/3.14 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 18.12/3.14 Prover 7: stopped
% 18.27/3.15 Prover 11: stopped
% 19.09/3.34 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 19.09/3.34 Prover 0: stopped
% 19.59/3.37 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 19.73/3.39 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 19.73/3.39 Prover 8: stopped
% 19.97/3.43 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 19.97/3.43 Prover 4: stopped
% 19.97/3.43
% 19.97/3.43 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 19.97/3.43
% 19.97/3.44 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 19.97/3.44 Assumptions after simplification:
% 19.97/3.44 ---------------------------------
% 19.97/3.44
% 19.97/3.44 (co1)
% 20.06/3.44 $false
% 20.06/3.45
% 20.06/3.45 Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 20.06/3.45 --------------------------------------------
% 20.06/3.45 ax1, ax10, ax11, ax12, ax13, ax14, ax15, ax16, ax17, ax18, ax19, ax2, ax20,
% 20.06/3.45 ax21, ax22, ax23, ax24, ax25, ax26, ax27, ax28, ax29, ax3, ax30, ax31, ax32,
% 20.06/3.45 ax33, ax34, ax35, ax36, ax37, ax38, ax39, ax4, ax40, ax41, ax42, ax43, ax44,
% 20.06/3.45 ax45, ax46, ax47, ax48, ax49, ax5, ax50, ax51, ax52, ax53, ax54, ax55, ax56,
% 20.06/3.45 ax57, ax58, ax59, ax6, ax60, ax61, ax62, ax63, ax64, ax65, ax66, ax67, ax68,
% 20.06/3.45 ax69, ax7, ax70, ax71, ax72, ax73, ax74, ax75, ax76, ax77, ax78, ax79, ax8,
% 20.06/3.45 ax80, ax81, ax82, ax83, ax84, ax85, ax86, ax87, ax88, ax89, ax9, ax90, ax91,
% 20.06/3.45 ax92, ax93, ax94, ax95
% 20.06/3.45
% 20.06/3.45 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 20.06/3.45 ---------------------------------
% 20.06/3.45
% 20.06/3.45 Begin of proof
% 20.06/3.45 |
% 20.06/3.45 | CLOSE: (co1) is inconsistent.
% 20.06/3.45 |
% 20.06/3.45 End of proof
% 20.06/3.45 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 20.06/3.45
% 20.06/3.45 2844ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------