TSTP Solution File: SWC110+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SWC110+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:27:41 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 42 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 196 ( 68 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 26 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 251 ( 97 ~; 92 |; 37 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 21 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 24 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 63 ( 0 sgn 35 !; 8 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ! [X5] :
( ssList(X5)
=> ( app(X3,X5) != X4
| ~ equalelemsP(X3)
| ? [X6] :
( ssItem(X6)
& ? [X7] :
( ssList(X7)
& app(cons(X6,nil),X7) = X5
& ? [X8] :
( ssList(X8)
& app(X8,cons(X6,nil)) = X3 ) ) ) ) )
| ( nil != X4
& nil = X3 )
| ( ( nil != X2
| nil = X1 )
& ( ~ neq(X2,nil)
| ( neq(X1,nil)
& segmentP(X2,X1) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
fof(ax15,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ( neq(X1,X2)
<=> X1 != X2 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax15) ).
fof(ax7,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ( segmentP(X1,X2)
<=> ? [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
& ? [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
& app(app(X3,X2),X4) = X1 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax7) ).
fof(ax17,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax17) ).
fof(ax83,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ( nil = app(X1,X2)
<=> ( nil = X2
& nil = X1 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax83) ).
fof(ax28,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> app(nil,X1) = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax28) ).
fof(ax26,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ssList(app(X1,X2)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax26) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ! [X5] :
( ssList(X5)
=> ( app(X3,X5) != X4
| ~ equalelemsP(X3)
| ? [X6] :
( ssItem(X6)
& ? [X7] :
( ssList(X7)
& app(cons(X6,nil),X7) = X5
& ? [X8] :
( ssList(X8)
& app(X8,cons(X6,nil)) = X3 ) ) ) ) )
| ( nil != X4
& nil = X3 )
| ( ( nil != X2
| nil = X1 )
& ( ~ neq(X2,nil)
| ( neq(X1,nil)
& segmentP(X2,X1) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ( neq(X1,X2)
<=> X1 != X2 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax15]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
! [X14,X15,X16] :
( ssList(esk1_0)
& ssList(esk2_0)
& ssList(esk3_0)
& ssList(esk4_0)
& esk2_0 = esk4_0
& esk1_0 = esk3_0
& ssList(esk5_0)
& app(esk3_0,esk5_0) = esk4_0
& equalelemsP(esk3_0)
& ( ~ ssItem(X14)
| ~ ssList(X15)
| app(cons(X14,nil),X15) != esk5_0
| ~ ssList(X16)
| app(X16,cons(X14,nil)) != esk3_0 )
& ( nil = esk4_0
| nil != esk3_0 )
& ( neq(esk2_0,nil)
| nil = esk2_0 )
& ( ~ neq(esk1_0,nil)
| ~ segmentP(esk2_0,esk1_0)
| nil = esk2_0 )
& ( neq(esk2_0,nil)
| nil != esk1_0 )
& ( ~ neq(esk1_0,nil)
| ~ segmentP(esk2_0,esk1_0)
| nil != esk1_0 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X37,X38] :
( ( ~ neq(X37,X38)
| X37 != X38
| ~ ssList(X38)
| ~ ssList(X37) )
& ( X37 = X38
| neq(X37,X38)
| ~ ssList(X38)
| ~ ssList(X37) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( nil = esk4_0
| nil != esk3_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
esk2_0 = esk4_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 = esk3_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ neq(X1,X2)
| X1 != X2
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( neq(esk2_0,nil)
| nil != esk1_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( esk2_0 = nil
| esk1_0 != nil ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X17,X18,X21,X22] :
( ( ssList(esk6_2(X17,X18))
| ~ segmentP(X17,X18)
| ~ ssList(X18)
| ~ ssList(X17) )
& ( ssList(esk7_2(X17,X18))
| ~ segmentP(X17,X18)
| ~ ssList(X18)
| ~ ssList(X17) )
& ( app(app(esk6_2(X17,X18),X18),esk7_2(X17,X18)) = X17
| ~ segmentP(X17,X18)
| ~ ssList(X18)
| ~ ssList(X17) )
& ( ~ ssList(X21)
| ~ ssList(X22)
| app(app(X21,X18),X22) != X17
| segmentP(X17,X18)
| ~ ssList(X18)
| ~ ssList(X17) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax7])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( X1 = X2
| neq(X1,X2)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
ssList(nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ neq(X1,X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( neq(nil,nil)
| esk1_0 != nil ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
! [X61,X62] :
( ( nil = X62
| nil != app(X61,X62)
| ~ ssList(X62)
| ~ ssList(X61) )
& ( nil = X61
| nil != app(X61,X62)
| ~ ssList(X62)
| ~ ssList(X61) )
& ( nil != X62
| nil != X61
| nil = app(X61,X62)
| ~ ssList(X62)
| ~ ssList(X61) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax83])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
app(esk3_0,esk5_0) = esk4_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( segmentP(X4,X3)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| app(app(X1,X3),X2) != X4
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssList(X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
fof(c_0_25,plain,
! [X49] :
( ~ ssList(X49)
| app(nil,X49) = X49 ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax28])])]) ).
fof(c_0_26,plain,
! [X44,X45] :
( ~ ssList(X44)
| ~ ssList(X45)
| ssList(app(X44,X45)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax26])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( X1 = nil
| neq(X1,nil)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 != nil,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( nil = X1
| nil != app(X1,X2)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
app(esk1_0,esk5_0) = esk2_0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_13]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk5_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( segmentP(app(app(X1,X2),X3),X2)
| ~ ssList(app(app(X1,X2),X3))
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( app(nil,X1) = X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( ssList(app(X1,X2))
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
( nil = esk2_0
| ~ neq(esk1_0,nil)
| ~ segmentP(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
neq(esk1_0,nil),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
esk2_0 != nil,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]),c_0_28])]),c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
( segmentP(app(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_19])]),c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
~ segmentP(esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37])]),c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_31]),c_0_28]),c_0_32])]),c_0_40]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWC110+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 03:48:53 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.57 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.57 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.57 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.57 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.57 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.57 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.57 # new_bool_3 with pid 20328 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.57 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.57 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.57 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.57 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.57 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.57 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.57 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.57 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 20331 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.20/0.57 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.57 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.57 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.57 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.57 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.57 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.57 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.57 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.57 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.57
% 0.20/0.57 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.57 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.57 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.57 # Parsed axioms : 96
% 0.20/0.57 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 67
% 0.20/0.57 # Initial clauses : 62
% 0.20/0.57 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Initial clauses in saturation : 62
% 0.20/0.57 # Processed clauses : 833
% 0.20/0.57 # ...of these trivial : 17
% 0.20/0.57 # ...subsumed : 267
% 0.20/0.57 # ...remaining for further processing : 549
% 0.20/0.57 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 17
% 0.20/0.57 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Backward-subsumed : 30
% 0.20/0.57 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.20/0.57 # Generated clauses : 3251
% 0.20/0.57 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3063
% 0.20/0.57 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 31
% 0.20/0.57 # Paramodulations : 3230
% 0.20/0.57 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Equation resolutions : 21
% 0.20/0.57 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Total rewrite steps : 990
% 0.20/0.57 # ...of those cached : 967
% 0.20/0.57 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.57 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.57 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.57 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.91/0.57 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.91/0.57 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.91/0.57 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.91/0.57 # Current number of processed clauses : 449
% 0.91/0.57 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 33
% 0.91/0.57 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.91/0.57 # Negative unit clauses : 27
% 0.91/0.57 # Non-unit-clauses : 389
% 0.91/0.57 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2323
% 0.91/0.57 # ...number of literals in the above : 9528
% 0.91/0.57 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.91/0.57 # Current number of archived clauses : 94
% 0.91/0.57 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 15372
% 0.91/0.57 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7049
% 0.91/0.57 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 248
% 0.91/0.57 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 580
% 0.91/0.57 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.91/0.57 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.91/0.57 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.91/0.57 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.91/0.57 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.91/0.57 # Termbank termtop insertions : 58948
% 0.91/0.57 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1788
% 0.91/0.57
% 0.91/0.57 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.91/0.57 # User time : 0.072 s
% 0.91/0.57 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.91/0.57 # Total time : 0.077 s
% 0.91/0.57 # Maximum resident set size: 2032 pages
% 0.91/0.57
% 0.91/0.57 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.91/0.57 # User time : 0.073 s
% 0.91/0.57 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.91/0.57 # Total time : 0.082 s
% 0.91/0.57 # Maximum resident set size: 1824 pages
% 0.91/0.57 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------