TSTP Solution File: SWC108+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SWC108+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 20:13:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.47s 2.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   21
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   60 (  15 unt;   6 nHn;  60 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  160 (  39 equ;  99 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   55 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_197,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = esk49_0
    | ~ neq(esk48_0,nil)
    | ~ segmentP(esk49_0,esk48_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ivk5xpf/input.p',i_0_197) ).

cnf(i_0_199,negated_conjecture,
    esk50_0 = esk48_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ivk5xpf/input.p',i_0_199) ).

cnf(i_0_194,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = esk51_0
    | neq(esk50_0,nil) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ivk5xpf/input.p',i_0_194) ).

cnf(i_0_200,negated_conjecture,
    esk49_0 = esk51_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ivk5xpf/input.p',i_0_200) ).

cnf(i_0_105,plain,
    ( segmentP(X1,X2)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ segmentP(X3,X2)
    | ~ segmentP(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ivk5xpf/input.p',i_0_105) ).

cnf(i_0_110,plain,
    ( segmentP(nil,X1)
    | nil != X1
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ivk5xpf/input.p',i_0_110) ).

cnf(i_0_44,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ivk5xpf/input.p',i_0_44) ).

cnf(i_0_109,plain,
    ( segmentP(X1,nil)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ivk5xpf/input.p',i_0_109) ).

cnf(i_0_196,negated_conjecture,
    ( neq(esk49_0,nil)
    | nil != esk48_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ivk5xpf/input.p',i_0_196) ).

cnf(i_0_202,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk50_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ivk5xpf/input.p',i_0_202) ).

cnf(i_0_203,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk49_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ivk5xpf/input.p',i_0_203) ).

cnf(i_0_42,plain,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ neq(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ivk5xpf/input.p',i_0_42) ).

cnf(i_0_191,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk50_0 = nil
    | rearsegP(esk51_0,esk50_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ivk5xpf/input.p',i_0_191) ).

cnf(i_0_149,plain,
    ( segmentP(X1,X2)
    | app(app(X3,X2),X4) != X1
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X4)
    | ~ ssList(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ivk5xpf/input.p',i_0_149) ).

cnf(i_0_159,plain,
    ( app(X1,nil) = X1
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ivk5xpf/input.p',i_0_159) ).

cnf(i_0_58,plain,
    ( ssList(app(X1,X2))
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ivk5xpf/input.p',i_0_58) ).

cnf(i_0_95,plain,
    ( rearsegP(X1,X2)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ rearsegP(X3,X2)
    | ~ rearsegP(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ivk5xpf/input.p',i_0_95) ).

cnf(i_0_131,plain,
    ( app(esk33_2(X1,X2),X2) = X1
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ rearsegP(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ivk5xpf/input.p',i_0_131) ).

cnf(i_0_132,plain,
    ( ssList(esk33_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ rearsegP(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ivk5xpf/input.p',i_0_132) ).

cnf(i_0_103,plain,
    ( rearsegP(nil,X1)
    | nil != X1
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ivk5xpf/input.p',i_0_103) ).

cnf(i_0_104,plain,
    ( nil = X1
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ rearsegP(nil,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7ivk5xpf/input.p',i_0_104) ).

cnf(c_0_225,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = esk49_0
    | ~ neq(esk48_0,nil)
    | ~ segmentP(esk49_0,esk48_0) ),
    i_0_197 ).

cnf(c_0_226,negated_conjecture,
    esk50_0 = esk48_0,
    i_0_199 ).

cnf(c_0_227,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = esk51_0
    | neq(esk50_0,nil) ),
    i_0_194 ).

cnf(c_0_228,negated_conjecture,
    esk49_0 = esk51_0,
    i_0_200 ).

cnf(c_0_229,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk49_0 = nil
    | ~ segmentP(esk49_0,esk50_0)
    | ~ neq(esk50_0,nil) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_225,c_0_226]),c_0_226]) ).

cnf(c_0_230,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk49_0 = nil
    | neq(esk50_0,nil) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_227,c_0_228]) ).

cnf(c_0_231,plain,
    ( segmentP(X1,X2)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ segmentP(X3,X2)
    | ~ segmentP(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_105 ).

cnf(c_0_232,plain,
    ( segmentP(nil,X1)
    | nil != X1
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    i_0_110 ).

cnf(c_0_233,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    i_0_44 ).

cnf(c_0_234,plain,
    ( segmentP(X1,nil)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    i_0_109 ).

cnf(c_0_235,negated_conjecture,
    ( neq(esk49_0,nil)
    | nil != esk48_0 ),
    i_0_196 ).

cnf(c_0_236,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk49_0 = nil
    | ~ segmentP(esk49_0,esk50_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_229,c_0_230]) ).

cnf(c_0_237,plain,
    ( segmentP(X1,X2)
    | nil != X2
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_231,c_0_232]),c_0_233])]),c_0_234]) ).

cnf(c_0_238,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk50_0),
    i_0_202 ).

cnf(c_0_239,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk49_0),
    i_0_203 ).

cnf(c_0_240,plain,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ neq(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_42 ).

cnf(c_0_241,negated_conjecture,
    ( neq(esk49_0,nil)
    | esk50_0 != nil ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_235,c_0_226]) ).

cnf(c_0_242,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk49_0 = nil
    | esk50_0 != nil ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_236,c_0_237]),c_0_238]),c_0_239])]) ).

cnf(c_0_243,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk50_0 = nil
    | rearsegP(esk51_0,esk50_0) ),
    i_0_191 ).

cnf(c_0_244,plain,
    ( ~ neq(X1,X1)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_240]) ).

cnf(c_0_245,negated_conjecture,
    ( neq(nil,nil)
    | esk50_0 != nil ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_241,c_0_242]) ).

cnf(c_0_246,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk50_0 = nil
    | rearsegP(esk49_0,esk50_0) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_243,c_0_228]) ).

cnf(c_0_247,plain,
    esk50_0 != nil,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_244,c_0_245]),c_0_233])]) ).

cnf(c_0_248,plain,
    ( segmentP(X1,X2)
    | app(app(X3,X2),X4) != X1
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X4)
    | ~ ssList(X3) ),
    i_0_149 ).

cnf(c_0_249,plain,
    ( app(X1,nil) = X1
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    i_0_159 ).

cnf(c_0_250,plain,
    ( ssList(app(X1,X2))
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    i_0_58 ).

cnf(c_0_251,plain,
    ( rearsegP(X1,X2)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ rearsegP(X3,X2)
    | ~ rearsegP(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_95 ).

cnf(c_0_252,negated_conjecture,
    rearsegP(esk49_0,esk50_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_246,c_0_247]) ).

cnf(c_0_253,plain,
    ( segmentP(X1,X2)
    | app(X3,X2) != X1
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_248,c_0_249]),c_0_233])]),c_0_250]) ).

cnf(c_0_254,plain,
    ( app(esk33_2(X1,X2),X2) = X1
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ rearsegP(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_131 ).

cnf(c_0_255,plain,
    ( ssList(esk33_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ rearsegP(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_132 ).

cnf(c_0_256,plain,
    ( rearsegP(X1,esk50_0)
    | ~ rearsegP(X1,esk49_0)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_251,c_0_252]),c_0_239]),c_0_238])]) ).

cnf(c_0_257,plain,
    ( rearsegP(nil,X1)
    | nil != X1
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    i_0_103 ).

cnf(c_0_258,plain,
    ( segmentP(X1,X2)
    | ~ rearsegP(X1,X2)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_253,c_0_254])]),c_0_255]) ).

cnf(c_0_259,plain,
    ( nil = X1
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ rearsegP(nil,X1) ),
    i_0_104 ).

cnf(c_0_260,plain,
    ( rearsegP(nil,esk50_0)
    | esk49_0 != nil ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_256,c_0_257]),c_0_233]),c_0_239])]) ).

cnf(c_0_261,negated_conjecture,
    segmentP(esk49_0,esk50_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_258,c_0_252]),c_0_238]),c_0_239])]) ).

cnf(c_0_262,plain,
    esk49_0 != nil,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_259,c_0_260]),c_0_238])]),c_0_247]) ).

cnf(c_0_263,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_236,c_0_261])]),c_0_262]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWC108+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 18:56:49 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.45  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.18/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.18/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.47/2.46  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 7.47/2.46  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.47/2.46  # Preprocessing time       : 0.014 s
% 7.47/2.46  
% 7.47/2.46  # Proof found!
% 7.47/2.46  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.47/2.46  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.47/2.46  # Proof object total steps             : 60
% 7.47/2.46  # Proof object clause steps            : 39
% 7.47/2.46  # Proof object formula steps           : 21
% 7.47/2.46  # Proof object conjectures             : 26
% 7.47/2.46  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 18
% 7.47/2.46  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 8
% 7.47/2.46  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 21
% 7.47/2.46  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 21
% 7.47/2.46  # Proof object generating inferences   : 11
% 7.47/2.46  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 35
% 7.47/2.46  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.47/2.46  # Parsed axioms                        : 202
% 7.47/2.46  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 7.47/2.46  # Initial clauses                      : 202
% 7.47/2.46  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 7.47/2.46  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 202
% 7.47/2.46  # Processed clauses                    : 327
% 7.47/2.46  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 7.47/2.46  # ...subsumed                          : 61
% 7.47/2.46  # ...remaining for further processing  : 264
% 7.47/2.46  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 112
% 7.47/2.46  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 7.47/2.46  # Backward-subsumed                    : 11
% 7.47/2.46  # Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 7.47/2.46  # Generated clauses                    : 1264
% 7.47/2.46  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 1048
% 7.47/2.46  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 73
% 7.47/2.46  # Paramodulations                      : 1123
% 7.47/2.46  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 7.47/2.46  # Equation resolutions                 : 138
% 7.47/2.46  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 7.47/2.46  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 7.47/2.46  # Current number of processed clauses  : 241
% 7.47/2.46  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 18
% 7.47/2.46  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.47/2.46  #    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 7.47/2.46  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 219
% 7.47/2.46  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 916
% 7.47/2.46  # ...number of literals in the above   : 6864
% 7.47/2.46  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 7.47/2.46  # Current number of archived clauses   : 17
% 7.47/2.46  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 12271
% 7.47/2.46  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3283
% 7.47/2.46  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 126
% 7.47/2.46  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 101
% 7.47/2.46  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 7.47/2.46  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 5
% 7.47/2.46  # BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 7.47/2.46  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 7.47/2.46  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 7.47/2.46  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 29831
% 7.47/2.46  
% 7.47/2.46  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.47/2.46  # User time                : 0.037 s
% 7.47/2.46  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 7.47/2.46  # Total time               : 0.044 s
% 7.47/2.46  # ...preprocessing         : 0.014 s
% 7.47/2.46  # ...main loop             : 0.029 s
% 7.47/2.46  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.47/2.46  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------