TSTP Solution File: SWC106+1 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : SWC106+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:49:41 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 38.87s 5.94s
% Output : Proof 47.07s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SWC106+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 15:34:39 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.58 ________ _____
% 0.18/0.58 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.18/0.59 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.18/0.59 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.18/0.59 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.18/0.59
% 0.18/0.59 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.18/0.59 (2023-06-19)
% 0.18/0.59
% 0.18/0.59 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.18/0.59 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.18/0.59 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.18/0.59 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.18/0.59
% 0.18/0.59 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.18/0.59
% 0.18/0.59 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.18/0.60 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.18/0.62 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.18/0.62 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.18/0.62 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.18/0.62 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.18/0.62 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.18/0.62 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.18/0.62 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 4.74/1.36 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 4.74/1.36 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 5.16/1.41 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 5.16/1.41 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 5.16/1.41 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 5.16/1.41 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 5.16/1.41 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 14.28/2.64 Prover 2: Proving ...
% 15.33/2.82 Prover 6: Proving ...
% 15.33/2.82 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 15.98/2.84 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 16.36/2.91 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 22.06/3.67 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 23.23/3.81 Prover 0: Proving ...
% 38.87/5.94 Prover 3: proved (5324ms)
% 38.87/5.94
% 38.87/5.94 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 38.87/5.94
% 38.87/5.94 Prover 5: stopped
% 38.87/5.95 Prover 0: stopped
% 38.87/5.96 Prover 2: stopped
% 40.07/5.96 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 40.07/5.96 Prover 6: stopped
% 40.07/5.97 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 40.07/5.97 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 40.07/5.97 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 40.07/5.97 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 41.01/6.11 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 41.46/6.17 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 41.46/6.19 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 41.46/6.21 Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 42.06/6.23 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 43.36/6.39 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 43.36/6.41 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 43.81/6.54 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 44.76/6.57 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 44.76/6.59 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 44.76/6.60 Prover 10: Found proof (size 27)
% 44.76/6.60 Prover 10: proved (631ms)
% 44.76/6.61 Prover 13: stopped
% 44.76/6.61 Prover 4: stopped
% 44.76/6.61 Prover 1: stopped
% 44.76/6.61 Prover 8: stopped
% 44.76/6.61 Prover 7: stopped
% 46.73/7.04 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 46.73/7.06 Prover 11: stopped
% 46.73/7.06
% 46.73/7.06 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 46.73/7.06
% 46.73/7.07 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 46.73/7.08 Assumptions after simplification:
% 46.73/7.08 ---------------------------------
% 46.73/7.08
% 46.73/7.08 (ax15)
% 47.07/7.09 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ ssList(v1) |
% 47.07/7.09 ~ ssList(v0) | neq(v0, v1)) & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) | ~ ssList(v0) | ~
% 47.07/7.09 neq(v0, v0))
% 47.07/7.09
% 47.07/7.09 (ax17)
% 47.07/7.09 $i(nil) & ssList(nil)
% 47.07/7.09
% 47.07/7.09 (ax39)
% 47.07/7.09 $i(nil) & ~ singletonP(nil)
% 47.07/7.09
% 47.07/7.09 (ax4)
% 47.07/7.13 $i(nil) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (cons(v1, nil) = v0) | ~ $i(v1) |
% 47.07/7.13 ~ $i(v0) | ~ ssList(v0) | ~ ssItem(v1) | singletonP(v0)) & ! [v0: $i] : (
% 47.07/7.13 ~ $i(v0) | ~ singletonP(v0) | ~ ssList(v0) | ? [v1: $i] : (cons(v1, nil)
% 47.07/7.13 = v0 & $i(v1) & ssItem(v1)))
% 47.07/7.13
% 47.07/7.13 (ax58)
% 47.07/7.13 $i(nil) & ! [v0: $i] : (v0 = nil | ~ $i(v0) | ~ segmentP(nil, v0) | ~
% 47.07/7.13 ssList(v0)) & ( ~ ssList(nil) | segmentP(nil, nil))
% 47.07/7.13
% 47.07/7.13 (ax6)
% 47.07/7.13 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (app(v2, v1) = v0) | ~ $i(v2) |
% 47.07/7.13 ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ ssList(v2) | ~ ssList(v1) | ~ ssList(v0) |
% 47.07/7.14 rearsegP(v0, v1)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~
% 47.07/7.14 rearsegP(v0, v1) | ~ ssList(v1) | ~ ssList(v0) | ? [v2: $i] : (app(v2,
% 47.07/7.14 v1) = v0 & $i(v2) & ssList(v2)))
% 47.07/7.14
% 47.07/7.14 (co1)
% 47.07/7.14 $i(nil) & ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : (cons(v2,
% 47.07/7.14 nil) = v0 & app(v3, v0) = v1 & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0) &
% 47.07/7.14 ssList(v3) & ssList(v1) & ssList(v0) & neq(v1, nil) & ssItem(v2) & ( ~
% 47.07/7.14 rearsegP(v1, v0) | ~ neq(v0, nil)))
% 47.07/7.14
% 47.07/7.14 Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 47.07/7.14 --------------------------------------------
% 47.07/7.14 ax1, ax10, ax11, ax12, ax13, ax14, ax16, ax18, ax19, ax2, ax20, ax21, ax22,
% 47.07/7.14 ax23, ax24, ax25, ax26, ax27, ax28, ax29, ax3, ax30, ax31, ax32, ax33, ax34,
% 47.07/7.14 ax35, ax36, ax37, ax38, ax40, ax41, ax42, ax43, ax44, ax45, ax46, ax47, ax48,
% 47.07/7.14 ax49, ax5, ax50, ax51, ax52, ax53, ax54, ax55, ax56, ax57, ax59, ax60, ax61,
% 47.07/7.14 ax62, ax63, ax64, ax65, ax66, ax67, ax68, ax69, ax7, ax70, ax71, ax72, ax73,
% 47.07/7.14 ax74, ax75, ax76, ax77, ax78, ax79, ax8, ax80, ax81, ax82, ax83, ax84, ax85,
% 47.07/7.14 ax86, ax87, ax88, ax89, ax9, ax90, ax91, ax92, ax93, ax94, ax95
% 47.07/7.14
% 47.07/7.14 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 47.07/7.14 ---------------------------------
% 47.07/7.14
% 47.07/7.14 Begin of proof
% 47.07/7.14 |
% 47.07/7.14 | ALPHA: (ax4) implies:
% 47.07/7.14 | (1) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (cons(v1, nil) = v0) | ~ $i(v1) | ~
% 47.07/7.14 | $i(v0) | ~ ssList(v0) | ~ ssItem(v1) | singletonP(v0))
% 47.07/7.14 |
% 47.07/7.14 | ALPHA: (ax6) implies:
% 47.07/7.14 | (2) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (app(v2, v1) = v0) | ~
% 47.07/7.14 | $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ ssList(v2) | ~ ssList(v1) | ~
% 47.07/7.14 | ssList(v0) | rearsegP(v0, v1))
% 47.07/7.15 |
% 47.07/7.15 | ALPHA: (ax15) implies:
% 47.07/7.15 | (3) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~
% 47.07/7.15 | ssList(v1) | ~ ssList(v0) | neq(v0, v1))
% 47.07/7.15 |
% 47.07/7.15 | ALPHA: (ax17) implies:
% 47.07/7.15 | (4) ssList(nil)
% 47.07/7.15 |
% 47.07/7.15 | ALPHA: (ax39) implies:
% 47.07/7.15 | (5) ~ singletonP(nil)
% 47.07/7.15 |
% 47.07/7.15 | ALPHA: (ax58) implies:
% 47.07/7.15 | (6) ~ ssList(nil) | segmentP(nil, nil)
% 47.07/7.15 |
% 47.07/7.15 | ALPHA: (co1) implies:
% 47.07/7.15 | (7) $i(nil)
% 47.07/7.15 | (8) ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : (cons(v2, nil)
% 47.07/7.15 | = v0 & app(v3, v0) = v1 & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0) &
% 47.07/7.15 | ssList(v3) & ssList(v1) & ssList(v0) & neq(v1, nil) & ssItem(v2) & (
% 47.07/7.15 | ~ rearsegP(v1, v0) | ~ neq(v0, nil)))
% 47.07/7.15 |
% 47.07/7.15 | DELTA: instantiating (8) with fresh symbols all_91_0, all_91_1, all_91_2,
% 47.07/7.15 | all_91_3 gives:
% 47.07/7.15 | (9) cons(all_91_1, nil) = all_91_3 & app(all_91_0, all_91_3) = all_91_2 &
% 47.07/7.15 | $i(all_91_0) & $i(all_91_1) & $i(all_91_2) & $i(all_91_3) &
% 47.07/7.15 | ssList(all_91_0) & ssList(all_91_2) & ssList(all_91_3) & neq(all_91_2,
% 47.07/7.15 | nil) & ssItem(all_91_1) & ( ~ rearsegP(all_91_2, all_91_3) | ~
% 47.07/7.15 | neq(all_91_3, nil))
% 47.07/7.15 |
% 47.07/7.15 | ALPHA: (9) implies:
% 47.07/7.15 | (10) ssItem(all_91_1)
% 47.07/7.15 | (11) ssList(all_91_3)
% 47.07/7.15 | (12) ssList(all_91_2)
% 47.07/7.15 | (13) ssList(all_91_0)
% 47.07/7.15 | (14) $i(all_91_3)
% 47.07/7.15 | (15) $i(all_91_2)
% 47.07/7.15 | (16) $i(all_91_1)
% 47.07/7.15 | (17) $i(all_91_0)
% 47.07/7.15 | (18) app(all_91_0, all_91_3) = all_91_2
% 47.07/7.15 | (19) cons(all_91_1, nil) = all_91_3
% 47.07/7.16 | (20) ~ rearsegP(all_91_2, all_91_3) | ~ neq(all_91_3, nil)
% 47.07/7.16 |
% 47.07/7.16 | BETA: splitting (6) gives:
% 47.07/7.16 |
% 47.07/7.16 | Case 1:
% 47.07/7.16 | |
% 47.07/7.16 | | (21) ~ ssList(nil)
% 47.07/7.16 | |
% 47.07/7.16 | | PRED_UNIFY: (4), (21) imply:
% 47.07/7.16 | | (22) $false
% 47.07/7.16 | |
% 47.07/7.16 | | CLOSE: (22) is inconsistent.
% 47.07/7.16 | |
% 47.07/7.16 | Case 2:
% 47.07/7.16 | |
% 47.07/7.16 | |
% 47.07/7.16 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_91_3, nil, simplifying with (4),
% 47.07/7.16 | | (7), (11), (14) gives:
% 47.07/7.16 | | (23) all_91_3 = nil | neq(all_91_3, nil)
% 47.07/7.16 | |
% 47.07/7.16 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_91_2, all_91_3, all_91_0,
% 47.07/7.16 | | simplifying with (11), (12), (13), (14), (15), (17), (18)
% 47.07/7.16 | | gives:
% 47.07/7.16 | | (24) rearsegP(all_91_2, all_91_3)
% 47.07/7.16 | |
% 47.07/7.16 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_91_3, all_91_1, simplifying with
% 47.07/7.16 | | (10), (11), (14), (16), (19) gives:
% 47.07/7.16 | | (25) singletonP(all_91_3)
% 47.07/7.16 | |
% 47.07/7.16 | | BETA: splitting (20) gives:
% 47.07/7.16 | |
% 47.07/7.16 | | Case 1:
% 47.07/7.16 | | |
% 47.07/7.16 | | | (26) ~ neq(all_91_3, nil)
% 47.07/7.16 | | |
% 47.07/7.16 | | | BETA: splitting (23) gives:
% 47.07/7.16 | | |
% 47.07/7.16 | | | Case 1:
% 47.07/7.16 | | | |
% 47.07/7.16 | | | | (27) neq(all_91_3, nil)
% 47.07/7.16 | | | |
% 47.07/7.16 | | | | PRED_UNIFY: (26), (27) imply:
% 47.07/7.16 | | | | (28) $false
% 47.07/7.16 | | | |
% 47.07/7.16 | | | | CLOSE: (28) is inconsistent.
% 47.07/7.16 | | | |
% 47.07/7.16 | | | Case 2:
% 47.07/7.16 | | | |
% 47.07/7.16 | | | | (29) all_91_3 = nil
% 47.07/7.16 | | | |
% 47.07/7.16 | | | | REDUCE: (25), (29) imply:
% 47.07/7.16 | | | | (30) singletonP(nil)
% 47.07/7.16 | | | |
% 47.07/7.16 | | | | PRED_UNIFY: (5), (30) imply:
% 47.07/7.16 | | | | (31) $false
% 47.07/7.16 | | | |
% 47.07/7.16 | | | | CLOSE: (31) is inconsistent.
% 47.07/7.16 | | | |
% 47.07/7.16 | | | End of split
% 47.07/7.16 | | |
% 47.07/7.16 | | Case 2:
% 47.07/7.16 | | |
% 47.07/7.16 | | | (32) ~ rearsegP(all_91_2, all_91_3)
% 47.07/7.16 | | |
% 47.07/7.16 | | | PRED_UNIFY: (24), (32) imply:
% 47.07/7.17 | | | (33) $false
% 47.07/7.17 | | |
% 47.07/7.17 | | | CLOSE: (33) is inconsistent.
% 47.07/7.17 | | |
% 47.07/7.17 | | End of split
% 47.07/7.17 | |
% 47.07/7.17 | End of split
% 47.07/7.17 |
% 47.07/7.17 End of proof
% 47.07/7.17 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 47.07/7.17
% 47.07/7.17 6579ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------