TSTP Solution File: SWC105-1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SWC105-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 21:56:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.55s 0.74s
% Output : Refutation 0.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 23 ( 9 unt; 7 nHn; 23 RR)
% Number of literals : 41 ( 17 equ; 13 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause8,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause8) ).
cnf(clause58,axiom,
( ~ ssList(X)
| rearsegP(X,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause58) ).
cnf(clause82,axiom,
( ~ rearsegP(nil,X)
| ~ ssList(X)
| nil = X ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause82) ).
cnf(co1_1,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_1) ).
cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).
cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
( nil = sk2
| ~ neq(sk1,nil)
| ~ rearsegP(sk2,sk1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).
cnf(co1_9,negated_conjecture,
( nil != sk1
| neq(sk2,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).
cnf(co1_10,negated_conjecture,
( nil != sk1
| ~ neq(sk1,nil)
| ~ rearsegP(sk2,sk1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_10) ).
cnf(co1_11,negated_conjecture,
( nil = sk4
| neq(sk3,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_11) ).
cnf(194,plain,
( nil = sk2
| neq(sk1,nil) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_11,co1_6,co1_5,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(co1_12,negated_conjecture,
( nil = sk4
| rearsegP(sk4,sk3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_12) ).
cnf(196,plain,
( nil = sk2
| rearsegP(sk2,sk1) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_12,co1_6,co1_5,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(co1_14,negated_conjecture,
( nil = sk3
| rearsegP(sk4,sk3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_14) ).
cnf(200,plain,
( nil = sk1
| rearsegP(sk2,sk1) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_14,co1_5,co1_6,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(279,plain,
rearsegP(nil,nil),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clause58,clause8]) ).
cnf(2062,plain,
nil = sk2,
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[co1_8,194,196]) ).
cnf(2064,plain,
( nil != sk1
| neq(nil,nil) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_9,2062,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(2065,plain,
( nil != sk1
| ~ neq(sk1,nil)
| ~ rearsegP(nil,sk1) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_10,2062,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(2066,plain,
( nil = sk1
| rearsegP(nil,sk1) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[200,2062,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(2067,plain,
nil = sk1,
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clause82,2066,co1_1]) ).
cnf(2069,plain,
neq(nil,nil),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[2064,2067,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(2070,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[2065,279,2069,2067,theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : SWC105-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.09 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.08/0.29 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.29 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.08/0.29 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 04:59:18 EDT 2022
% 0.08/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.37 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.38 *
% 0.13/0.38 *
% 0.13/0.39 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.13/0.39 *
% 0.13/0.39 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.13/0.39 *
% 0.13/0.39 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.13/0.39 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.13/0.39 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.13/0.39 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.13/0.39 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.13/0.39 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.13/0.39 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.13/0.39 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.13/0.39 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.13/0.39 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.13/0.39 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.13/0.39 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.13/0.39 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.13/0.39 *
% 0.13/0.39 "."
% 0.13/0.39 *
% 0.13/0.39 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-12T04:59:19
% 0.13/0.39 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n022.cluster.edu at 2022-06-12T04:59:19
% 0.55/0.74
% 0.55/0.74
% 0.55/0.74 #||
% 0.55/0.74 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/0.74 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.55/0.74 ||#
% 0.55/0.74
% 0.55/0.74 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.55/0.74 ; 4132 formulas have been input or derived (from 99 formulas).
% 0.55/0.74 ; 2070 (50%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.55/0.74 ; 189 ( 9%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.55/0.74 ; 1881 (91%) are still being kept.
% 0.55/0.74 ;
% 0.55/0.74 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.55/0.74 ; 0.035 10% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.55/0.74 ; 0.005 1% Assert (199 calls)
% 0.55/0.74 ; 0.117 33% Process new row (4,113 calls)
% 0.55/0.74 ; 0.063 18% Resolution (196 calls)
% 0.55/0.74 ; 0.002 1% Paramodulation (98 calls)
% 0.55/0.74 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (6 calls)
% 0.55/0.74 ; 0.002 1% Condensing (228 calls)
% 0.55/0.74 ; 0.005 1% Forward subsumption (228 calls)
% 0.55/0.74 ; 0.005 1% Backward subsumption (226 calls)
% 0.55/0.74 ; 0.000 0% Clause clause subsumption (59 calls)
% 0.55/0.74 ; 0.051 15% Forward simplification (4,112 calls)
% 0.55/0.74 ; 0.020 6% Backward simplification (2,066 calls)
% 0.55/0.74 ; 0.000 0% Ordering (256 calls)
% 0.55/0.74 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.55/0.74 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.55/0.74 ; 0.045 13% Other
% 0.55/0.74 ; 0.350 Total
% 0.55/0.74 ; 0.353 Real time
% 0.55/0.74 ;
% 0.55/0.74 ; Term-hash-array has 3,767 terms in all.
% 0.55/0.74 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 209 entries (223 at peak, 226 added, 17 deleted).
% 0.55/0.74 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 667 nodes (747 at peak, 768 added, 101 deleted).
% 0.55/0.74 ; Retrieved 114 possibly forward subsuming rows in 228 calls.
% 0.55/0.74 ; Retrieved 78 possibly backward subsumed rows in 226 calls.
% 0.55/0.74 ; Path-index has 3,442 entries (3,768 at peak, 3,777 added, 335 deleted).
% 0.55/0.74 ; Path-index has 2,704 nodes (2,745 at peak, 2,754 added, 50 deleted).
% 0.55/0.74 ; Trie-index has 3,442 entries (3,768 at peak, 3,777 added, 335 deleted).
% 0.55/0.74 ; Trie-index has 7,992 nodes (8,469 at peak, 8,480 added, 488 deleted).
% 0.55/0.74 ; Retrieved 2,262 generalization terms in 5,895 calls.
% 0.55/0.74 ; Retrieved 1,839 instance terms in 1,839 calls.
% 0.55/0.74 ; Retrieved 52,062 unifiable terms in 2,769 calls.
% 0.55/0.74 ;
% 0.55/0.74 ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 1 entry:
% 0.55/0.74 ; 1 with value 0
% 0.55/0.74 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 100 entries:
% 0.55/0.74 ; 2 with value 4 11 with value 20 6 with value 27
% 0.55/0.74 ; 11 with value 13 9 with value 21 1 with value 29
% 0.55/0.74 ; 12 with value 14 5 with value 22 1 with value 32
% 0.55/0.74 ; 3 with value 15 2 with value 23 1 with value 33
% 0.55/0.74 ; 3 with value 16 3 with value 24 1 with value 35
% 0.55/0.74 ; 4 with value 17 8 with value 25 2 with value 40
% 0.55/0.74 ; 7 with value 18 3 with value 26 3 with value 44
% 0.55/0.74 ; 2 with value 19
% 0.55/0.74 ; The agenda of rows to give has 1695 entries:
% 0.55/0.74 ; 13 with value (4 5) 792 with value (4 10) 12 with value (4 13)
% 0.55/0.74 ; 94 with value (4 7) 384 with value (4 11) 42 with value (4 14)
% 0.55/0.74 ; 127 with value (4 8) 36 with value (4 12) 12 with value (4 16)
% 0.55/0.74 ; 183 with value (4 9)
% 0.55/0.74 Evaluation took:
% 0.55/0.74 0.354 seconds of real time
% 0.55/0.74 0.314479 seconds of user run time
% 0.55/0.74 0.039095 seconds of system run time
% 0.55/0.74 [Run times include 0.018 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.55/0.74 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.55/0.74 0 page faults and
% 0.55/0.74 20,308,568 bytes consed.
% 0.55/0.74 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.55/0.74 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-12T04:59:19
% 0.55/0.74 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.55/0.74 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------