TSTP Solution File: SWC097-1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWC097-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:36:12 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.54s 0.74s
% Output : Refutation 0.54s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 30 ( 6 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 28 ( 15 ~; 12 |; 0 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f245,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f242,f239]) ).
fof(f239,plain,
ssItem(sk5),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f198,f237]) ).
fof(f237,plain,
neq(sk4,nil),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f202]) ).
fof(f202,plain,
( neq(sk4,nil)
| neq(sk4,nil) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f192,f190,f190]) ).
fof(f190,axiom,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).
fof(f192,axiom,
( neq(sk2,nil)
| neq(sk2,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
fof(f198,axiom,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| ssItem(sk5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_13) ).
fof(f242,plain,
~ ssItem(sk5),
inference(resolution,[],[f238,f240]) ).
fof(f240,plain,
sQ0_eqProxy(sk4,app(sk3,cons(sk5,nil))),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f216,f237]) ).
fof(f216,plain,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| sQ0_eqProxy(sk4,app(sk3,cons(sk5,nil))) ),
inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f199,f212]) ).
fof(f212,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( sQ0_eqProxy(X0,X1)
<=> X0 = X1 ),
introduced(equality_proxy_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[sQ0_eqProxy])]) ).
fof(f199,axiom,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| sk4 = app(sk3,cons(sk5,nil)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_14) ).
fof(f238,plain,
! [X6] :
( ~ sQ0_eqProxy(sk4,app(sk3,cons(X6,nil)))
| ~ ssItem(X6) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f215,f237]) ).
fof(f215,plain,
! [X6] :
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| ~ sQ0_eqProxy(sk4,app(sk3,cons(X6,nil)))
| ~ ssItem(X6) ),
inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f207,f212]) ).
fof(f207,plain,
! [X6] :
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| sk4 != app(sk3,cons(X6,nil))
| ~ ssItem(X6) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f197,f190,f191]) ).
fof(f191,axiom,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
fof(f197,axiom,
! [X6] :
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| sk2 != app(sk1,cons(X6,nil))
| ~ ssItem(X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_12) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08 % Problem : SWC097-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.09/0.29 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % DateTime : Sun May 19 03:08:07 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.30 This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.09/0.30 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.54/0.73 % (22517)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.54/0.73 % (22514)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.54/0.73 % (22513)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.54/0.73 % (22509)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.54/0.73 % (22516)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.54/0.73 % (22512)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.54/0.73 % (22511)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.54/0.74 % (22517)First to succeed.
% 0.54/0.74 % (22509)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.54/0.74 % (22517)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-22508"
% 0.54/0.74 % (22511)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.54/0.74 % (22514)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.54/0.74 % (22517)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.54/0.74 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.54/0.74 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.54/0.74 % (22517)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.74 % (22517)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.54/0.74 % (22517)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.54/0.74
% 0.54/0.74 % (22517)Memory used [KB]: 1177
% 0.54/0.74 % (22517)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.54/0.74 % (22517)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.54/0.74 % (22508)Success in time 0.434 s
% 0.54/0.74 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------