TSTP Solution File: SWC094+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SWC094+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:36:11 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.71s 0.88s
% Output   : Refutation 0.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  197 (  86 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   24 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  264 (  99   ~;  78   |;  73   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   18 (   7 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   92 (  62   !;  30   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f197,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f196,f134]) ).

fof(f134,plain,
    ssList(sK3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).

fof(f122,plain,
    ( ! [X4] :
        ( ! [X5] :
            ( ! [X6] :
                ( app(X4,X6) != sK1
                | app(app(X4,X5),X6) != sK0
                | ~ ssList(X6) )
            | ~ ssList(X5) )
        | ~ ssList(X4) )
    & sK2 = sK3
    & sK0 = sK2
    & sK1 = sK3
    & ssList(sK3)
    & ssList(sK2)
    & ssList(sK1)
    & ssList(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f99,f121,f120,f119,f118]) ).

fof(f118,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ? [X1] :
            ( ? [X2] :
                ( ? [X3] :
                    ( ! [X4] :
                        ( ! [X5] :
                            ( ! [X6] :
                                ( app(X4,X6) != X1
                                | app(app(X4,X5),X6) != X0
                                | ~ ssList(X6) )
                            | ~ ssList(X5) )
                        | ~ ssList(X4) )
                    & X2 = X3
                    & X0 = X2
                    & X1 = X3
                    & ssList(X3) )
                & ssList(X2) )
            & ssList(X1) )
        & ssList(X0) )
   => ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ! [X4] :
                      ( ! [X5] :
                          ( ! [X6] :
                              ( app(X4,X6) != X1
                              | app(app(X4,X5),X6) != sK0
                              | ~ ssList(X6) )
                          | ~ ssList(X5) )
                      | ~ ssList(X4) )
                  & X2 = X3
                  & sK0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(sK0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f119,plain,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( ? [X2] :
            ( ? [X3] :
                ( ! [X4] :
                    ( ! [X5] :
                        ( ! [X6] :
                            ( app(X4,X6) != X1
                            | app(app(X4,X5),X6) != sK0
                            | ~ ssList(X6) )
                        | ~ ssList(X5) )
                    | ~ ssList(X4) )
                & X2 = X3
                & sK0 = X2
                & X1 = X3
                & ssList(X3) )
            & ssList(X2) )
        & ssList(X1) )
   => ( ? [X2] :
          ( ? [X3] :
              ( ! [X4] :
                  ( ! [X5] :
                      ( ! [X6] :
                          ( app(X4,X6) != sK1
                          | app(app(X4,X5),X6) != sK0
                          | ~ ssList(X6) )
                      | ~ ssList(X5) )
                  | ~ ssList(X4) )
              & X2 = X3
              & sK0 = X2
              & sK1 = X3
              & ssList(X3) )
          & ssList(X2) )
      & ssList(sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f120,plain,
    ( ? [X2] :
        ( ? [X3] :
            ( ! [X4] :
                ( ! [X5] :
                    ( ! [X6] :
                        ( app(X4,X6) != sK1
                        | app(app(X4,X5),X6) != sK0
                        | ~ ssList(X6) )
                    | ~ ssList(X5) )
                | ~ ssList(X4) )
            & X2 = X3
            & sK0 = X2
            & sK1 = X3
            & ssList(X3) )
        & ssList(X2) )
   => ( ? [X3] :
          ( ! [X4] :
              ( ! [X5] :
                  ( ! [X6] :
                      ( app(X4,X6) != sK1
                      | app(app(X4,X5),X6) != sK0
                      | ~ ssList(X6) )
                  | ~ ssList(X5) )
              | ~ ssList(X4) )
          & sK2 = X3
          & sK0 = sK2
          & sK1 = X3
          & ssList(X3) )
      & ssList(sK2) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f121,plain,
    ( ? [X3] :
        ( ! [X4] :
            ( ! [X5] :
                ( ! [X6] :
                    ( app(X4,X6) != sK1
                    | app(app(X4,X5),X6) != sK0
                    | ~ ssList(X6) )
                | ~ ssList(X5) )
            | ~ ssList(X4) )
        & sK2 = X3
        & sK0 = sK2
        & sK1 = X3
        & ssList(X3) )
   => ( ! [X4] :
          ( ! [X5] :
              ( ! [X6] :
                  ( app(X4,X6) != sK1
                  | app(app(X4,X5),X6) != sK0
                  | ~ ssList(X6) )
              | ~ ssList(X5) )
          | ~ ssList(X4) )
      & sK2 = sK3
      & sK0 = sK2
      & sK1 = sK3
      & ssList(sK3) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f99,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ! [X4] :
                      ( ! [X5] :
                          ( ! [X6] :
                              ( app(X4,X6) != X1
                              | app(app(X4,X5),X6) != X0
                              | ~ ssList(X6) )
                          | ~ ssList(X5) )
                      | ~ ssList(X4) )
                  & X2 = X3
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f98]) ).

fof(f98,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ! [X4] :
                      ( ! [X5] :
                          ( ! [X6] :
                              ( app(X4,X6) != X1
                              | app(app(X4,X5),X6) != X0
                              | ~ ssList(X6) )
                          | ~ ssList(X5) )
                      | ~ ssList(X4) )
                  & X2 = X3
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ssList(X3)
                   => ( ? [X4] :
                          ( ? [X5] :
                              ( ? [X6] :
                                  ( app(X4,X6) = X1
                                  & app(app(X4,X5),X6) = X0
                                  & ssList(X6) )
                              & ssList(X5) )
                          & ssList(X4) )
                      | X2 != X3
                      | X0 != X2
                      | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                 => ( ? [X4] :
                        ( ? [X5] :
                            ( ? [X6] :
                                ( app(X4,X6) = X1
                                & app(app(X4,X5),X6) = X0
                                & ssList(X6) )
                            & ssList(X5) )
                        & ssList(X4) )
                    | X2 != X3
                    | X0 != X2
                    | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(f196,plain,
    ~ ssList(sK3),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f194]) ).

fof(f194,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sK3 != X0
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f193,f150]) ).

fof(f150,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax17) ).

fof(f193,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sK3 != X0
      | ~ ssList(X0)
      | ~ ssList(nil) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f186]) ).

fof(f186,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sK3 != X0
      | ~ ssList(X0)
      | ~ ssList(nil)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f185,f147]) ).

fof(f147,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( app(nil,X0) = X0
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f108]) ).

fof(f108,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( app(nil,X0) = X0
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

fof(f28,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => app(nil,X0) = X0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax28) ).

fof(f185,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( app(X0,X1) != sK3
      | ~ ssList(X1)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f179,f150]) ).

fof(f179,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( app(X0,X1) != sK3
      | ~ ssList(X1)
      | ~ ssList(nil)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f173]) ).

fof(f173,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( app(X0,X1) != sK3
      | app(X0,X1) != sK3
      | ~ ssList(X1)
      | ~ ssList(nil)
      | ~ ssList(X0)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f163,f139]) ).

fof(f139,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( app(X0,nil) = X0
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f100]) ).

fof(f100,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( app(X0,nil) = X0
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f84]) ).

fof(f84,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => app(X0,nil) = X0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax84) ).

fof(f163,plain,
    ! [X6,X4,X5] :
      ( app(app(X4,X5),X6) != sK3
      | app(X4,X6) != sK3
      | ~ ssList(X6)
      | ~ ssList(X5)
      | ~ ssList(X4) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f138,f135,f162]) ).

fof(f162,plain,
    sK0 = sK3,
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f136,f137]) ).

fof(f137,plain,
    sK2 = sK3,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).

fof(f136,plain,
    sK0 = sK2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).

fof(f135,plain,
    sK1 = sK3,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).

fof(f138,plain,
    ! [X6,X4,X5] :
      ( app(X4,X6) != sK1
      | app(app(X4,X5),X6) != sK0
      | ~ ssList(X6)
      | ~ ssList(X5)
      | ~ ssList(X4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SWC094+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.14/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 02:40:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.35  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.14/0.35  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.71/0.87  % (28826)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/45Mi)
% 0.71/0.87  % (28827)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/83Mi)
% 0.71/0.87  % (28824)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/33Mi)
% 0.71/0.87  % (28823)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/78Mi)
% 0.71/0.87  % (28822)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/51Mi)
% 0.71/0.87  % (28825)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.71/0.87  % (28821)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.71/0.87  % (28828)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/56Mi)
% 0.71/0.88  % (28826)First to succeed.
% 0.71/0.88  % (28826)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-28795"
% 0.71/0.88  % (28826)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.71/0.88  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.71/0.88  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.71/0.88  % (28826)------------------------------
% 0.71/0.88  % (28826)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.71/0.88  % (28826)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.71/0.88  
% 0.71/0.88  % (28826)Memory used [KB]: 1159
% 0.71/0.88  % (28826)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.71/0.88  % (28826)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.71/0.88  % (28795)Success in time 0.517 s
% 0.71/0.88  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------