TSTP Solution File: SWC094+1 by SInE---0.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : SWC094+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec 26 10:16:26 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   22
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  133 (  55 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  168 (  68   ~;  55   |;  36   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   20 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   53 (   0 sgn  23   !;  14   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(5,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => app(X1,nil) = X1 ),
    file('/tmp/tmp-7qD1N/sel_SWC094+1.p_1',ax84) ).

fof(11,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/tmp/tmp-7qD1N/sel_SWC094+1.p_1',ax17) ).

fof(17,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ssList(X3)
             => ! [X4] :
                  ( ssList(X4)
                 => ( X2 != X4
                    | X1 != X3
                    | X4 != X3
                    | ? [X5] :
                        ( ssList(X5)
                        & ? [X6] :
                            ( ssList(X6)
                            & ? [X7] :
                                ( ssList(X7)
                                & app(app(X5,X6),X7) = X1
                                & app(X5,X7) = X2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/tmp/tmp-7qD1N/sel_SWC094+1.p_1',co1) ).

fof(18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                   => ( X2 != X4
                      | X1 != X3
                      | X4 != X3
                      | ? [X5] :
                          ( ssList(X5)
                          & ? [X6] :
                              ( ssList(X6)
                              & ? [X7] :
                                  ( ssList(X7)
                                  & app(app(X5,X6),X7) = X1
                                  & app(X5,X7) = X2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[17]) ).

fof(36,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ~ ssList(X1)
      | app(X1,nil) = X1 ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

fof(37,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ ssList(X2)
      | app(X2,nil) = X2 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[36]) ).

cnf(38,plain,
    ( app(X1,nil) = X1
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[37]) ).

cnf(65,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

fof(87,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
      & ? [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
          & ? [X3] :
              ( ssList(X3)
              & ? [X4] :
                  ( ssList(X4)
                  & X2 = X4
                  & X1 = X3
                  & X4 = X3
                  & ! [X5] :
                      ( ~ ssList(X5)
                      | ! [X6] :
                          ( ~ ssList(X6)
                          | ! [X7] :
                              ( ~ ssList(X7)
                              | app(app(X5,X6),X7) != X1
                              | app(X5,X7) != X2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

fof(88,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X8] :
      ( ssList(X8)
      & ? [X9] :
          ( ssList(X9)
          & ? [X10] :
              ( ssList(X10)
              & ? [X11] :
                  ( ssList(X11)
                  & X9 = X11
                  & X8 = X10
                  & X11 = X10
                  & ! [X12] :
                      ( ~ ssList(X12)
                      | ! [X13] :
                          ( ~ ssList(X13)
                          | ! [X14] :
                              ( ~ ssList(X14)
                              | app(app(X12,X13),X14) != X8
                              | app(X12,X14) != X9 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[87]) ).

fof(89,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssList(esk5_0)
    & ssList(esk6_0)
    & ssList(esk7_0)
    & ssList(esk8_0)
    & esk6_0 = esk8_0
    & esk5_0 = esk7_0
    & esk8_0 = esk7_0
    & ! [X12] :
        ( ~ ssList(X12)
        | ! [X13] :
            ( ~ ssList(X13)
            | ! [X14] :
                ( ~ ssList(X14)
                | app(app(X12,X13),X14) != esk5_0
                | app(X12,X14) != esk6_0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[88]) ).

fof(90,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X12,X13,X14] :
      ( ( ~ ssList(X14)
        | app(app(X12,X13),X14) != esk5_0
        | app(X12,X14) != esk6_0
        | ~ ssList(X13)
        | ~ ssList(X12) )
      & esk6_0 = esk8_0
      & esk5_0 = esk7_0
      & esk8_0 = esk7_0
      & ssList(esk8_0)
      & ssList(esk7_0)
      & ssList(esk6_0)
      & ssList(esk5_0) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[89]) ).

cnf(91,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[90]) ).

cnf(95,negated_conjecture,
    esk8_0 = esk7_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[90]) ).

cnf(96,negated_conjecture,
    esk5_0 = esk7_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[90]) ).

cnf(97,negated_conjecture,
    esk6_0 = esk8_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[90]) ).

cnf(98,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | app(X1,X3) != esk6_0
    | app(app(X1,X2),X3) != esk5_0
    | ~ ssList(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[90]) ).

cnf(102,negated_conjecture,
    esk8_0 = esk5_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[95,96,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(180,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(X1,X3) != esk5_0
    | app(app(X1,X2),X3) != esk5_0
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[98,97,theory(equality)]),102,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(181,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(app(X1,X2),nil) != esk5_0
    | X1 != esk5_0
    | ~ ssList(nil)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[180,38,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(185,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(app(X1,X2),nil) != esk5_0
    | X1 != esk5_0
    | $false
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[181,65,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(186,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(app(X1,X2),nil) != esk5_0
    | X1 != esk5_0
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[185,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(239,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(app(esk5_0,X1),nil) != esk5_0
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(esk5_0) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[186,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(240,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(app(esk5_0,X1),nil) != esk5_0
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | $false ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[239,91,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(241,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(app(esk5_0,X1),nil) != esk5_0
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[240,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(242,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(esk5_0,nil) != esk5_0
    | ~ ssList(nil)
    | ~ ssList(esk5_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[241,38,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(245,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(esk5_0,nil) != esk5_0
    | $false
    | ~ ssList(esk5_0) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[242,65,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(246,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(esk5_0,nil) != esk5_0
    | $false
    | $false ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[245,91,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(247,negated_conjecture,
    app(esk5_0,nil) != esk5_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[246,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(251,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ssList(esk5_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[247,38,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(252,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[251,91,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(253,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[252,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(254,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    253,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWC/SWC094+1.p
% --creating new selector for [SWC001+0.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmp-7qD1N/sel_SWC094+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SWC094+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWC/SWC094+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWC/SWC094+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------