TSTP Solution File: SWC068+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SWC068+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:35:59 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.59s 0.77s
% Output   : Refutation 0.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   71 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  351 ( 101 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   26 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  452 ( 172   ~; 148   |; 104   &)
%                                         (   8 <=>;  20  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  103 (  65   !;  38   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f596,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f219,f233,f253,f541,f595]) ).

fof(f595,plain,
    ( ~ spl10_1
    | spl10_2 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f594]) ).

fof(f594,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl10_1
    | spl10_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f593,f175]) ).

fof(f175,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax17) ).

fof(f593,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(nil)
    | ~ spl10_1
    | spl10_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f569,f218]) ).

fof(f218,plain,
    ( nil != sK2
    | spl10_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f216]) ).

fof(f216,plain,
    ( spl10_2
  <=> nil = sK2 ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl10_2])]) ).

fof(f569,plain,
    ( nil = sK2
    | ~ ssList(nil)
    | ~ spl10_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f160,f543]) ).

fof(f543,plain,
    ( sK2 = app(nil,nil)
    | ~ spl10_1 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f155,f213]) ).

fof(f213,plain,
    ( nil = sK3
    | ~ spl10_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f212]) ).

fof(f212,plain,
    ( spl10_1
  <=> nil = sK3 ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl10_1])]) ).

fof(f155,plain,
    sK2 = app(sK3,sK3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f134,plain,
    ( ( nil != sK0
      | nil != sK1 )
    & ! [X4] :
        ( ~ segmentP(sK0,X4)
        | ~ segmentP(sK1,X4)
        | ~ neq(X4,nil)
        | ~ ssList(X4) )
    & sK0 = sK2
    & sK1 = sK3
    & sK2 = app(sK3,sK3)
    & ssList(sK3)
    & ssList(sK2)
    & ssList(sK1)
    & ssList(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f99,f133,f132,f131,f130]) ).

fof(f130,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ? [X1] :
            ( ? [X2] :
                ( ? [X3] :
                    ( ( nil != X0
                      | nil != X1 )
                    & ! [X4] :
                        ( ~ segmentP(X0,X4)
                        | ~ segmentP(X1,X4)
                        | ~ neq(X4,nil)
                        | ~ ssList(X4) )
                    & X0 = X2
                    & X1 = X3
                    & app(X3,X3) = X2
                    & ssList(X3) )
                & ssList(X2) )
            & ssList(X1) )
        & ssList(X0) )
   => ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( nil != sK0
                    | nil != X1 )
                  & ! [X4] :
                      ( ~ segmentP(sK0,X4)
                      | ~ segmentP(X1,X4)
                      | ~ neq(X4,nil)
                      | ~ ssList(X4) )
                  & sK0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & app(X3,X3) = X2
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(sK0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f131,plain,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( ? [X2] :
            ( ? [X3] :
                ( ( nil != sK0
                  | nil != X1 )
                & ! [X4] :
                    ( ~ segmentP(sK0,X4)
                    | ~ segmentP(X1,X4)
                    | ~ neq(X4,nil)
                    | ~ ssList(X4) )
                & sK0 = X2
                & X1 = X3
                & app(X3,X3) = X2
                & ssList(X3) )
            & ssList(X2) )
        & ssList(X1) )
   => ( ? [X2] :
          ( ? [X3] :
              ( ( nil != sK0
                | nil != sK1 )
              & ! [X4] :
                  ( ~ segmentP(sK0,X4)
                  | ~ segmentP(sK1,X4)
                  | ~ neq(X4,nil)
                  | ~ ssList(X4) )
              & sK0 = X2
              & sK1 = X3
              & app(X3,X3) = X2
              & ssList(X3) )
          & ssList(X2) )
      & ssList(sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f132,plain,
    ( ? [X2] :
        ( ? [X3] :
            ( ( nil != sK0
              | nil != sK1 )
            & ! [X4] :
                ( ~ segmentP(sK0,X4)
                | ~ segmentP(sK1,X4)
                | ~ neq(X4,nil)
                | ~ ssList(X4) )
            & sK0 = X2
            & sK1 = X3
            & app(X3,X3) = X2
            & ssList(X3) )
        & ssList(X2) )
   => ( ? [X3] :
          ( ( nil != sK0
            | nil != sK1 )
          & ! [X4] :
              ( ~ segmentP(sK0,X4)
              | ~ segmentP(sK1,X4)
              | ~ neq(X4,nil)
              | ~ ssList(X4) )
          & sK0 = sK2
          & sK1 = X3
          & app(X3,X3) = sK2
          & ssList(X3) )
      & ssList(sK2) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f133,plain,
    ( ? [X3] :
        ( ( nil != sK0
          | nil != sK1 )
        & ! [X4] :
            ( ~ segmentP(sK0,X4)
            | ~ segmentP(sK1,X4)
            | ~ neq(X4,nil)
            | ~ ssList(X4) )
        & sK0 = sK2
        & sK1 = X3
        & app(X3,X3) = sK2
        & ssList(X3) )
   => ( ( nil != sK0
        | nil != sK1 )
      & ! [X4] :
          ( ~ segmentP(sK0,X4)
          | ~ segmentP(sK1,X4)
          | ~ neq(X4,nil)
          | ~ ssList(X4) )
      & sK0 = sK2
      & sK1 = sK3
      & sK2 = app(sK3,sK3)
      & ssList(sK3) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f99,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( nil != X0
                    | nil != X1 )
                  & ! [X4] :
                      ( ~ segmentP(X0,X4)
                      | ~ segmentP(X1,X4)
                      | ~ neq(X4,nil)
                      | ~ ssList(X4) )
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & app(X3,X3) = X2
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f98]) ).

fof(f98,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( nil != X0
                    | nil != X1 )
                  & ! [X4] :
                      ( ~ segmentP(X0,X4)
                      | ~ segmentP(X1,X4)
                      | ~ neq(X4,nil)
                      | ~ ssList(X4) )
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & app(X3,X3) = X2
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ssList(X3)
                   => ( ( nil = X0
                        & nil = X1 )
                      | ? [X4] :
                          ( segmentP(X0,X4)
                          & segmentP(X1,X4)
                          & neq(X4,nil)
                          & ssList(X4) )
                      | X0 != X2
                      | X1 != X3
                      | app(X3,X3) != X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                 => ( ( nil = X0
                      & nil = X1 )
                    | ? [X4] :
                        ( segmentP(X0,X4)
                        & segmentP(X1,X4)
                        & neq(X4,nil)
                        & ssList(X4) )
                    | X0 != X2
                    | X1 != X3
                    | app(X3,X3) != X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(f160,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( app(X0,nil) = X0
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f100]) ).

fof(f100,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( app(X0,nil) = X0
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f84]) ).

fof(f84,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => app(X0,nil) = X0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax84) ).

fof(f541,plain,
    spl10_4,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f528,f230]) ).

fof(f230,plain,
    ( spl10_4
  <=> segmentP(sK2,sK3) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl10_4])]) ).

fof(f528,plain,
    segmentP(sK2,sK3),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f527,f175]) ).

fof(f527,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(nil)
    | segmentP(sK2,sK3) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f524,f153]) ).

fof(f153,plain,
    ssList(sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f524,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(sK2)
    | ~ ssList(nil)
    | segmentP(sK2,sK3) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f523]) ).

fof(f523,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(sK2)
    | ~ ssList(nil)
    | segmentP(sK2,sK3)
    | ~ ssList(sK2) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f515,f160]) ).

fof(f515,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ssList(app(sK2,X0))
      | ~ ssList(X0)
      | segmentP(app(sK2,X0),sK3) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f509,f154]) ).

fof(f154,plain,
    ssList(sK3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f509,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ssList(app(sK2,X0))
      | ~ ssList(X0)
      | ~ ssList(sK3)
      | segmentP(app(sK2,X0),sK3) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f506]) ).

fof(f506,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ssList(app(sK2,X0))
      | ~ ssList(X0)
      | ~ ssList(sK3)
      | ~ ssList(sK3)
      | segmentP(app(sK2,X0),sK3) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f207,f155]) ).

fof(f207,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X1] :
      ( ~ ssList(app(app(X2,X1),X3))
      | ~ ssList(X3)
      | ~ ssList(X2)
      | ~ ssList(X1)
      | segmentP(app(app(X2,X1),X3),X1) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f186]) ).

fof(f186,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( segmentP(X0,X1)
      | app(app(X2,X1),X3) != X0
      | ~ ssList(X3)
      | ~ ssList(X2)
      | ~ ssList(X1)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f144]) ).

fof(f144,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( ( segmentP(X0,X1)
              | ! [X2] :
                  ( ! [X3] :
                      ( app(app(X2,X1),X3) != X0
                      | ~ ssList(X3) )
                  | ~ ssList(X2) ) )
            & ( ( app(app(sK4(X0,X1),X1),sK5(X0,X1)) = X0
                & ssList(sK5(X0,X1))
                & ssList(sK4(X0,X1)) )
              | ~ segmentP(X0,X1) ) )
          | ~ ssList(X1) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4,sK5])],[f141,f143,f142]) ).

fof(f142,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ? [X4] :
          ( ? [X5] :
              ( app(app(X4,X1),X5) = X0
              & ssList(X5) )
          & ssList(X4) )
     => ( ? [X5] :
            ( app(app(sK4(X0,X1),X1),X5) = X0
            & ssList(X5) )
        & ssList(sK4(X0,X1)) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f143,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ? [X5] :
          ( app(app(sK4(X0,X1),X1),X5) = X0
          & ssList(X5) )
     => ( app(app(sK4(X0,X1),X1),sK5(X0,X1)) = X0
        & ssList(sK5(X0,X1)) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f141,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( ( segmentP(X0,X1)
              | ! [X2] :
                  ( ! [X3] :
                      ( app(app(X2,X1),X3) != X0
                      | ~ ssList(X3) )
                  | ~ ssList(X2) ) )
            & ( ? [X4] :
                  ( ? [X5] :
                      ( app(app(X4,X1),X5) = X0
                      & ssList(X5) )
                  & ssList(X4) )
              | ~ segmentP(X0,X1) ) )
          | ~ ssList(X1) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f140]) ).

fof(f140,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( ( segmentP(X0,X1)
              | ! [X2] :
                  ( ! [X3] :
                      ( app(app(X2,X1),X3) != X0
                      | ~ ssList(X3) )
                  | ~ ssList(X2) ) )
            & ( ? [X2] :
                  ( ? [X3] :
                      ( app(app(X2,X1),X3) = X0
                      & ssList(X3) )
                  & ssList(X2) )
              | ~ segmentP(X0,X1) ) )
          | ~ ssList(X1) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).

fof(f122,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( segmentP(X0,X1)
          <=> ? [X2] :
                ( ? [X3] :
                    ( app(app(X2,X1),X3) = X0
                    & ssList(X3) )
                & ssList(X2) ) )
          | ~ ssList(X1) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ( segmentP(X0,X1)
          <=> ? [X2] :
                ( ? [X3] :
                    ( app(app(X2,X1),X3) = X0
                    & ssList(X3) )
                & ssList(X2) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax7) ).

fof(f253,plain,
    ( spl10_1
    | spl10_3 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f252]) ).

fof(f252,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl10_1
    | spl10_3 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f251,f154]) ).

fof(f251,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(sK3)
    | spl10_1
    | spl10_3 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f250,f175]) ).

fof(f250,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(nil)
    | ~ ssList(sK3)
    | spl10_1
    | spl10_3 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f245,f214]) ).

fof(f214,plain,
    ( nil != sK3
    | spl10_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f212]) ).

fof(f245,plain,
    ( nil = sK3
    | ~ ssList(nil)
    | ~ ssList(sK3)
    | spl10_3 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f172,f228]) ).

fof(f228,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
    | spl10_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f226]) ).

fof(f226,plain,
    ( spl10_3
  <=> neq(sK3,nil) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl10_3])]) ).

fof(f172,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( neq(X0,X1)
      | X0 = X1
      | ~ ssList(X1)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f137]) ).

fof(f137,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( ( neq(X0,X1)
              | X0 = X1 )
            & ( X0 != X1
              | ~ neq(X0,X1) ) )
          | ~ ssList(X1) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f111]) ).

fof(f111,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( neq(X0,X1)
          <=> X0 != X1 )
          | ~ ssList(X1) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ( neq(X0,X1)
          <=> X0 != X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax15) ).

fof(f233,plain,
    ( ~ spl10_3
    | ~ spl10_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f224,f230,f226]) ).

fof(f224,plain,
    ( ~ segmentP(sK2,sK3)
    | ~ neq(sK3,nil) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f223,f154]) ).

fof(f223,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(sK3)
    | ~ segmentP(sK2,sK3)
    | ~ neq(sK3,nil) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f222]) ).

fof(f222,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(sK3)
    | ~ segmentP(sK2,sK3)
    | ~ neq(sK3,nil)
    | ~ ssList(sK3) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f180,f199]) ).

fof(f199,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ~ segmentP(sK3,X4)
      | ~ segmentP(sK2,X4)
      | ~ neq(X4,nil)
      | ~ ssList(X4) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f158,f157,f156]) ).

fof(f156,plain,
    sK1 = sK3,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f157,plain,
    sK0 = sK2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f158,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ~ segmentP(sK0,X4)
      | ~ segmentP(sK1,X4)
      | ~ neq(X4,nil)
      | ~ ssList(X4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f180,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( segmentP(X0,X0)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f117]) ).

fof(f117,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( segmentP(X0,X0)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f55]) ).

fof(f55,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => segmentP(X0,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax55) ).

fof(f219,plain,
    ( ~ spl10_1
    | ~ spl10_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f198,f216,f212]) ).

fof(f198,plain,
    ( nil != sK2
    | nil != sK3 ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f159,f157,f156]) ).

fof(f159,plain,
    ( nil != sK0
    | nil != sK1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12  % Problem    : SWC068+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 03:26:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.36  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.14/0.36  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.53/0.75  % (29739)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.53/0.75  % (29732)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.53/0.75  % (29734)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.53/0.75  % (29733)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.53/0.75  % (29735)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.53/0.75  % (29737)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.53/0.75  % (29736)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.53/0.75  % (29738)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.59/0.77  % (29734)First to succeed.
% 0.59/0.77  % (29734)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-29562"
% 0.59/0.77  % (29739)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.59/0.77  % (29739)------------------------------
% 0.59/0.77  % (29739)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.59/0.77  % (29739)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.59/0.77  % (29739)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.59/0.77  
% 0.59/0.77  % (29739)Memory used [KB]: 1596
% 0.59/0.77  % (29739)Time elapsed: 0.018 s
% 0.59/0.77  % (29739)Instructions burned: 58 (million)
% 0.59/0.77  % (29739)------------------------------
% 0.59/0.77  % (29739)------------------------------
% 0.59/0.77  % (29734)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.59/0.77  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.59/0.77  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.59/0.77  % (29734)------------------------------
% 0.59/0.77  % (29734)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.59/0.77  % (29734)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.59/0.77  
% 0.59/0.77  % (29734)Memory used [KB]: 1306
% 0.59/0.77  % (29734)Time elapsed: 0.016 s
% 0.59/0.77  % (29734)Instructions burned: 23 (million)
% 0.59/0.77  % (29562)Success in time 0.394 s
% 0.59/0.77  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------