TSTP Solution File: SWC059+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWC059+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:35:54 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.51s 0.67s
% Output : Refutation 0.51s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 49 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 324 ( 92 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 36 ( 6 avg)
% Number of connectives : 426 ( 151 ~; 135 |; 121 &)
% ( 6 <=>; 13 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 11 ( 9 usr; 7 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 54 ( 28 !; 26 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f231,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f168,f173,f178,f179,f184,f189,f190,f230]) ).
fof(f230,plain,
( ~ spl6_2
| ~ spl6_5
| ~ spl6_6 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f229]) ).
fof(f229,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl6_2
| ~ spl6_5
| ~ spl6_6 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f228,f183]) ).
fof(f183,plain,
( segmentP(sK3,sK2)
| ~ spl6_5 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f181]) ).
fof(f181,plain,
( spl6_5
<=> segmentP(sK3,sK2) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl6_5])]) ).
fof(f228,plain,
( ~ segmentP(sK3,sK2)
| ~ spl6_2
| ~ spl6_6 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f227,f195]) ).
fof(f195,plain,
segmentP(sK2,sK2),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f126,f144]) ).
fof(f144,plain,
! [X0] :
( segmentP(X0,X0)
| ~ ssList(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f106]) ).
fof(f106,plain,
! [X0] :
( segmentP(X0,X0)
| ~ ssList(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f55]) ).
fof(f55,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> segmentP(X0,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax55) ).
fof(f126,plain,
ssList(sK2),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f116]) ).
fof(f116,plain,
( ( ( ! [X4] :
( ~ segmentP(sK0,X4)
| ~ segmentP(sK1,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& neq(sK1,nil) )
| ( nil != sK0
& nil = sK1 ) )
& ( ( segmentP(sK3,sK2)
& neq(sK2,nil) )
| ~ neq(sK3,nil) )
& ( nil != sK3
| nil = sK2 )
& sK0 = sK2
& sK1 = sK3
& ssList(sK3)
& ssList(sK2)
& ssList(sK1)
& ssList(sK0) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f100,f115,f114,f113,f112]) ).
fof(f112,plain,
( ? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( ( ! [X4] :
( ~ segmentP(X0,X4)
| ~ segmentP(X1,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& neq(X1,nil) )
| ( nil != X0
& nil = X1 ) )
& ( ( segmentP(X3,X2)
& neq(X2,nil) )
| ~ neq(X3,nil) )
& ( nil != X3
| nil = X2 )
& X0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(X0) )
=> ( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( ( ! [X4] :
( ~ segmentP(sK0,X4)
| ~ segmentP(X1,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& neq(X1,nil) )
| ( nil != sK0
& nil = X1 ) )
& ( ( segmentP(X3,X2)
& neq(X2,nil) )
| ~ neq(X3,nil) )
& ( nil != X3
| nil = X2 )
& sK0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(sK0) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f113,plain,
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( ( ! [X4] :
( ~ segmentP(sK0,X4)
| ~ segmentP(X1,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& neq(X1,nil) )
| ( nil != sK0
& nil = X1 ) )
& ( ( segmentP(X3,X2)
& neq(X2,nil) )
| ~ neq(X3,nil) )
& ( nil != X3
| nil = X2 )
& sK0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
=> ( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( ( ! [X4] :
( ~ segmentP(sK0,X4)
| ~ segmentP(sK1,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& neq(sK1,nil) )
| ( nil != sK0
& nil = sK1 ) )
& ( ( segmentP(X3,X2)
& neq(X2,nil) )
| ~ neq(X3,nil) )
& ( nil != X3
| nil = X2 )
& sK0 = X2
& sK1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(sK1) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f114,plain,
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( ( ! [X4] :
( ~ segmentP(sK0,X4)
| ~ segmentP(sK1,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& neq(sK1,nil) )
| ( nil != sK0
& nil = sK1 ) )
& ( ( segmentP(X3,X2)
& neq(X2,nil) )
| ~ neq(X3,nil) )
& ( nil != X3
| nil = X2 )
& sK0 = X2
& sK1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
=> ( ? [X3] :
( ( ( ! [X4] :
( ~ segmentP(sK0,X4)
| ~ segmentP(sK1,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& neq(sK1,nil) )
| ( nil != sK0
& nil = sK1 ) )
& ( ( segmentP(X3,sK2)
& neq(sK2,nil) )
| ~ neq(X3,nil) )
& ( nil != X3
| nil = sK2 )
& sK0 = sK2
& sK1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(sK2) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f115,plain,
( ? [X3] :
( ( ( ! [X4] :
( ~ segmentP(sK0,X4)
| ~ segmentP(sK1,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& neq(sK1,nil) )
| ( nil != sK0
& nil = sK1 ) )
& ( ( segmentP(X3,sK2)
& neq(sK2,nil) )
| ~ neq(X3,nil) )
& ( nil != X3
| nil = sK2 )
& sK0 = sK2
& sK1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
=> ( ( ( ! [X4] :
( ~ segmentP(sK0,X4)
| ~ segmentP(sK1,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& neq(sK1,nil) )
| ( nil != sK0
& nil = sK1 ) )
& ( ( segmentP(sK3,sK2)
& neq(sK2,nil) )
| ~ neq(sK3,nil) )
& ( nil != sK3
| nil = sK2 )
& sK0 = sK2
& sK1 = sK3
& ssList(sK3) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f100,plain,
? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( ( ! [X4] :
( ~ segmentP(X0,X4)
| ~ segmentP(X1,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& neq(X1,nil) )
| ( nil != X0
& nil = X1 ) )
& ( ( segmentP(X3,X2)
& neq(X2,nil) )
| ~ neq(X3,nil) )
& ( nil != X3
| nil = X2 )
& X0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f99]) ).
fof(f99,plain,
? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( ( ! [X4] :
( ~ segmentP(X0,X4)
| ~ segmentP(X1,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& neq(X1,nil) )
| ( nil != X0
& nil = X1 ) )
& ( ( segmentP(X3,X2)
& neq(X2,nil) )
| ~ neq(X3,nil) )
& ( nil != X3
| nil = X2 )
& X0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).
fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ( ( ( ? [X4] :
( segmentP(X0,X4)
& segmentP(X1,X4)
& neq(X4,nil)
& ssList(X4) )
| ~ neq(X1,nil) )
& ( nil = X0
| nil != X1 ) )
| ( ( ~ segmentP(X3,X2)
| ~ neq(X2,nil) )
& neq(X3,nil) )
| ( nil = X3
& nil != X2 )
| X0 != X2
| X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).
fof(f96,conjecture,
! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ( ( ( ? [X4] :
( segmentP(X0,X4)
& segmentP(X1,X4)
& neq(X4,nil)
& ssList(X4) )
| ~ neq(X1,nil) )
& ( nil = X0
| nil != X1 ) )
| ( ( ~ segmentP(X3,X2)
| ~ neq(X2,nil) )
& neq(X3,nil) )
| ( nil = X3
& nil != X2 )
| X0 != X2
| X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
fof(f227,plain,
( ~ segmentP(sK2,sK2)
| ~ segmentP(sK3,sK2)
| ~ spl6_2
| ~ spl6_6 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f217,f126]) ).
fof(f217,plain,
( ~ ssList(sK2)
| ~ segmentP(sK2,sK2)
| ~ segmentP(sK3,sK2)
| ~ spl6_2
| ~ spl6_6 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f167,f188]) ).
fof(f188,plain,
( neq(sK2,nil)
| ~ spl6_6 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f186]) ).
fof(f186,plain,
( spl6_6
<=> neq(sK2,nil) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl6_6])]) ).
fof(f167,plain,
( ! [X4] :
( ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4)
| ~ segmentP(sK2,X4)
| ~ segmentP(sK3,X4) )
| ~ spl6_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f166]) ).
fof(f166,plain,
( spl6_2
<=> ! [X4] :
( ~ segmentP(sK2,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ segmentP(sK3,X4) ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl6_2])]) ).
fof(f190,plain,
( spl6_1
| ~ spl6_3 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f130,f170,f162]) ).
fof(f162,plain,
( spl6_1
<=> nil = sK2 ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl6_1])]) ).
fof(f170,plain,
( spl6_3
<=> nil = sK3 ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl6_3])]) ).
fof(f130,plain,
( nil != sK3
| nil = sK2 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f116]) ).
fof(f189,plain,
( ~ spl6_4
| spl6_6 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f131,f186,f175]) ).
fof(f175,plain,
( spl6_4
<=> neq(sK3,nil) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl6_4])]) ).
fof(f131,plain,
( neq(sK2,nil)
| ~ neq(sK3,nil) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f116]) ).
fof(f184,plain,
( ~ spl6_4
| spl6_5 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f132,f181,f175]) ).
fof(f132,plain,
( segmentP(sK3,sK2)
| ~ neq(sK3,nil) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f116]) ).
fof(f179,plain,
( spl6_3
| spl6_4 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f154,f175,f170]) ).
fof(f154,plain,
( neq(sK3,nil)
| nil = sK3 ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f133,f128,f128]) ).
fof(f128,plain,
sK1 = sK3,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f116]) ).
fof(f133,plain,
( neq(sK1,nil)
| nil = sK1 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f116]) ).
fof(f178,plain,
( ~ spl6_1
| spl6_4 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f153,f175,f162]) ).
fof(f153,plain,
( neq(sK3,nil)
| nil != sK2 ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f134,f128,f129]) ).
fof(f129,plain,
sK0 = sK2,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f116]) ).
fof(f134,plain,
( neq(sK1,nil)
| nil != sK0 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f116]) ).
fof(f173,plain,
( spl6_3
| spl6_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f152,f166,f170]) ).
fof(f152,plain,
! [X4] :
( ~ segmentP(sK2,X4)
| ~ segmentP(sK3,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4)
| nil = sK3 ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f135,f129,f128,f128]) ).
fof(f135,plain,
! [X4] :
( ~ segmentP(sK0,X4)
| ~ segmentP(sK1,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4)
| nil = sK1 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f116]) ).
fof(f168,plain,
( ~ spl6_1
| spl6_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f151,f166,f162]) ).
fof(f151,plain,
! [X4] :
( ~ segmentP(sK2,X4)
| ~ segmentP(sK3,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4)
| nil != sK2 ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f136,f129,f128,f129]) ).
fof(f136,plain,
! [X4] :
( ~ segmentP(sK0,X4)
| ~ segmentP(sK1,X4)
| ~ neq(X4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X4)
| nil != sK0 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f116]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.09 % Problem : SWC059+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.04/0.10 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Sun May 19 03:16:37 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.31 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.10/0.31 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.51/0.66 % (14764)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.51/0.67 % (14766)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.51/0.67 % (14767)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.51/0.67 % (14768)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.51/0.67 % (14770)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.51/0.67 % (14769)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.51/0.67 % (14763)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.51/0.67 % (14766)First to succeed.
% 0.51/0.67 % (14766)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-14762"
% 0.51/0.67 % (14766)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.51/0.67 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.51/0.67 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.51/0.67 % (14766)------------------------------
% 0.51/0.67 % (14766)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.51/0.67 % (14766)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.51/0.67
% 0.51/0.67 % (14766)Memory used [KB]: 1171
% 0.51/0.67 % (14766)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.51/0.67 % (14766)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.51/0.67 % (14762)Success in time 0.358 s
% 0.51/0.67 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------