TSTP Solution File: SWC059+1 by SRASS---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SRASS---0.1
% Problem : SWC059+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Dec 30 07:00:36 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 1.51s
% Output : Solution 1.51s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP18206/SWC059+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM ...
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP18206/SWC059+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP18206/SWC059+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 18338
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.02 WC
% # Preprocessing time : 0.029 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:(ssList(X1)=>![X2]:(ssList(X2)=>(neq(X1,X2)<=>~(X1=X2)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax15)).
% fof(2, axiom,ssList(nil),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax17)).
% fof(5, axiom,![X1]:(ssList(X1)=>segmentP(X1,X1)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax55)).
% fof(96, conjecture,![X1]:(ssList(X1)=>![X2]:(ssList(X2)=>![X3]:(ssList(X3)=>![X4]:(ssList(X4)=>((((~(X2=X4)|~(X1=X3))|(~(nil=X3)&nil=X4))|(neq(X4,nil)&(~(neq(X3,nil))|~(segmentP(X4,X3)))))|((~(nil=X2)|nil=X1)&(~(neq(X2,nil))|?[X5]:(((ssList(X5)&neq(X5,nil))&segmentP(X2,X5))&segmentP(X1,X5))))))))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', co1)).
% fof(97, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:(ssList(X1)=>![X2]:(ssList(X2)=>![X3]:(ssList(X3)=>![X4]:(ssList(X4)=>((((~(X2=X4)|~(X1=X3))|(~(nil=X3)&nil=X4))|(neq(X4,nil)&(~(neq(X3,nil))|~(segmentP(X4,X3)))))|((~(nil=X2)|nil=X1)&(~(neq(X2,nil))|?[X5]:(((ssList(X5)&neq(X5,nil))&segmentP(X2,X5))&segmentP(X1,X5)))))))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[96])).
% fof(103, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:(ssList(X1)=>![X2]:(ssList(X2)=>![X3]:(ssList(X3)=>![X4]:(ssList(X4)=>((((~(X2=X4)|~(X1=X3))|(~(nil=X3)&nil=X4))|(neq(X4,nil)&(~(neq(X3,nil))|~(segmentP(X4,X3)))))|((~(nil=X2)|nil=X1)&(~(neq(X2,nil))|?[X5]:(((ssList(X5)&neq(X5,nil))&segmentP(X2,X5))&segmentP(X1,X5)))))))))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[97,theory(equality)])).
% fof(104, plain,![X1]:(~(ssList(X1))|![X2]:(~(ssList(X2))|((~(neq(X1,X2))|~(X1=X2))&(X1=X2|neq(X1,X2))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1])).
% fof(105, plain,![X3]:(~(ssList(X3))|![X4]:(~(ssList(X4))|((~(neq(X3,X4))|~(X3=X4))&(X3=X4|neq(X3,X4))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[104])).
% fof(106, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((~(ssList(X4))|((~(neq(X3,X4))|~(X3=X4))&(X3=X4|neq(X3,X4))))|~(ssList(X3))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[105])).
% fof(107, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((((~(neq(X3,X4))|~(X3=X4))|~(ssList(X4)))|~(ssList(X3)))&(((X3=X4|neq(X3,X4))|~(ssList(X4)))|~(ssList(X3)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[106])).
% cnf(109,plain,(~ssList(X1)|~ssList(X2)|X1!=X2|~neq(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[107])).
% cnf(110,plain,(ssList(nil)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[2])).
% fof(119, plain,![X1]:(~(ssList(X1))|segmentP(X1,X1)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[5])).
% fof(120, plain,![X2]:(~(ssList(X2))|segmentP(X2,X2)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[119])).
% cnf(121,plain,(segmentP(X1,X1)|~ssList(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[120])).
% fof(568, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:(ssList(X1)&?[X2]:(ssList(X2)&?[X3]:(ssList(X3)&?[X4]:(ssList(X4)&((((X2=X4&X1=X3)&(nil=X3|~(nil=X4)))&(~(neq(X4,nil))|(neq(X3,nil)&segmentP(X4,X3))))&((nil=X2&~(nil=X1))|(neq(X2,nil)&![X5]:(((~(ssList(X5))|~(neq(X5,nil)))|~(segmentP(X2,X5)))|~(segmentP(X1,X5)))))))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[103])).
% fof(569, negated_conjecture,?[X6]:(ssList(X6)&?[X7]:(ssList(X7)&?[X8]:(ssList(X8)&?[X9]:(ssList(X9)&((((X7=X9&X6=X8)&(nil=X8|~(nil=X9)))&(~(neq(X9,nil))|(neq(X8,nil)&segmentP(X9,X8))))&((nil=X7&~(nil=X6))|(neq(X7,nil)&![X10]:(((~(ssList(X10))|~(neq(X10,nil)))|~(segmentP(X7,X10)))|~(segmentP(X6,X10)))))))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[568])).
% fof(570, negated_conjecture,(ssList(esk48_0)&(ssList(esk49_0)&(ssList(esk50_0)&(ssList(esk51_0)&((((esk49_0=esk51_0&esk48_0=esk50_0)&(nil=esk50_0|~(nil=esk51_0)))&(~(neq(esk51_0,nil))|(neq(esk50_0,nil)&segmentP(esk51_0,esk50_0))))&((nil=esk49_0&~(nil=esk48_0))|(neq(esk49_0,nil)&![X10]:(((~(ssList(X10))|~(neq(X10,nil)))|~(segmentP(esk49_0,X10)))|~(segmentP(esk48_0,X10)))))))))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[569])).
% fof(571, negated_conjecture,![X10]:((((((((((~(ssList(X10))|~(neq(X10,nil)))|~(segmentP(esk49_0,X10)))|~(segmentP(esk48_0,X10)))&neq(esk49_0,nil))|(nil=esk49_0&~(nil=esk48_0)))&(((esk49_0=esk51_0&esk48_0=esk50_0)&(nil=esk50_0|~(nil=esk51_0)))&(~(neq(esk51_0,nil))|(neq(esk50_0,nil)&segmentP(esk51_0,esk50_0)))))&ssList(esk51_0))&ssList(esk50_0))&ssList(esk49_0))&ssList(esk48_0)),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[570])).
% fof(572, negated_conjecture,![X10]:((((((((nil=esk49_0|(((~(ssList(X10))|~(neq(X10,nil)))|~(segmentP(esk49_0,X10)))|~(segmentP(esk48_0,X10))))&(~(nil=esk48_0)|(((~(ssList(X10))|~(neq(X10,nil)))|~(segmentP(esk49_0,X10)))|~(segmentP(esk48_0,X10)))))&((nil=esk49_0|neq(esk49_0,nil))&(~(nil=esk48_0)|neq(esk49_0,nil))))&(((esk49_0=esk51_0&esk48_0=esk50_0)&(nil=esk50_0|~(nil=esk51_0)))&((neq(esk50_0,nil)|~(neq(esk51_0,nil)))&(segmentP(esk51_0,esk50_0)|~(neq(esk51_0,nil))))))&ssList(esk51_0))&ssList(esk50_0))&ssList(esk49_0))&ssList(esk48_0)),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(573,negated_conjecture,(ssList(esk48_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[572])).
% cnf(577,negated_conjecture,(segmentP(esk51_0,esk50_0)|~neq(esk51_0,nil)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[572])).
% cnf(578,negated_conjecture,(neq(esk50_0,nil)|~neq(esk51_0,nil)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[572])).
% cnf(579,negated_conjecture,(nil=esk50_0|nil!=esk51_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[572])).
% cnf(580,negated_conjecture,(esk48_0=esk50_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[572])).
% cnf(581,negated_conjecture,(esk49_0=esk51_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[572])).
% cnf(582,negated_conjecture,(neq(esk49_0,nil)|nil!=esk48_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[572])).
% cnf(583,negated_conjecture,(neq(esk49_0,nil)|nil=esk49_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[572])).
% cnf(585,negated_conjecture,(nil=esk49_0|~segmentP(esk48_0,X1)|~segmentP(esk49_0,X1)|~neq(X1,nil)|~ssList(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[572])).
% cnf(588,negated_conjecture,(esk48_0=nil|esk51_0!=nil),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[579,580,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(589,negated_conjecture,(esk48_0=nil|esk49_0!=nil),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[588,581,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(590,negated_conjecture,(neq(esk48_0,nil)|~neq(esk51_0,nil)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[578,580,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(591,negated_conjecture,(neq(esk48_0,nil)|~neq(esk49_0,nil)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[590,581,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(592,negated_conjecture,(neq(esk48_0,nil)|esk49_0=nil),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[591,583,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(593,negated_conjecture,(segmentP(esk49_0,esk48_0)|~neq(esk51_0,nil)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[577,581,theory(equality)]),580,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(594,negated_conjecture,(segmentP(esk49_0,esk48_0)|~neq(esk49_0,nil)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[593,581,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(595,negated_conjecture,(segmentP(esk49_0,esk48_0)|esk49_0=nil),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[594,583,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(600,negated_conjecture,(esk49_0=nil|~segmentP(esk49_0,esk48_0)|~neq(esk48_0,nil)|~ssList(esk48_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[585,121,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(604,negated_conjecture,(esk49_0=nil|~segmentP(esk49_0,esk48_0)|~neq(esk48_0,nil)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[600,573,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(605,negated_conjecture,(esk49_0=nil|~segmentP(esk49_0,esk48_0)|~neq(esk48_0,nil)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[604,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(613,plain,(~neq(X1,X1)|~ssList(X1)),inference(er,[status(thm)],[109,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1362,negated_conjecture,(esk49_0=nil|~segmentP(esk49_0,esk48_0)),inference(csr,[status(thm)],[605,592])).
% cnf(1363,negated_conjecture,(esk49_0=nil),inference(csr,[status(thm)],[1362,595])).
% cnf(1378,negated_conjecture,(neq(nil,nil)|esk48_0!=nil),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[582,1363,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1383,negated_conjecture,(esk48_0=nil|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[589,1363,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1384,negated_conjecture,(esk48_0=nil),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[1383,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1388,negated_conjecture,(neq(nil,nil)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1378,1384,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1389,negated_conjecture,(neq(nil,nil)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[1388,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1559,negated_conjecture,(~ssList(nil)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[613,1389,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1560,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1559,110,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1561,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[1560,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1562,negated_conjecture,($false),1561,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses : 228
% # ...of these trivial : 4
% # ...subsumed : 4
% # ...remaining for further processing: 220
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 69
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed : 0
% # Backward-rewritten : 19
% # Generated clauses : 604
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 501
% # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% # Paramodulations : 513
% # Factorizations : 0
% # Equation resolutions : 91
% # Current number of processed clauses: 195
% # Positive orientable unit clauses: 23
% # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% # Negative unit clauses : 2
% # Non-unit-clauses : 170
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 446
% # ...number of literals in the above : 3184
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 911
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 192
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts : 4
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes : 4
% # Backwards rewriting index: 232 leaves, 1.35+/-1.139 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index: 106 leaves, 1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index: 197 leaves, 1.24+/-0.983 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time : 0.064 s
% # System time : 0.005 s
% # Total time : 0.069 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.20 CPU 0.26 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.20 CPU 0.26 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP18206/SWC059+1.tptp
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------