TSTP Solution File: SWC059+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWC059+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:01:26 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.78s 1.00s
% Output   : Refutation 0.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SWC059+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 09:42:09 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.78/1.00  
% 0.78/1.00  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.78/1.00  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.78/1.00  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.78/1.00  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.78/1.00  SPASS derived 877 clauses, backtracked 686 clauses, performed 35 splits and kept 1462 clauses.
% 0.78/1.00  SPASS allocated 99031 KBytes.
% 0.78/1.00  SPASS spent	0:00:00.63 on the problem.
% 0.78/1.00  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.78/1.00  		0:00:00.07 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.78/1.00  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.78/1.00  		0:00:00.01 for the backtracking.
% 0.78/1.00  		0:00:00.36 for the reduction.
% 0.78/1.00  
% 0.78/1.00  
% 0.78/1.00  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 66 :
% 0.78/1.00  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.78/1.00  1[0:Inp] ||  -> ssList(skc5)*.
% 0.78/1.00  2[0:Inp] ||  -> ssList(skc4)*.
% 0.78/1.00  58[0:Inp] ||  -> SkP0(u,v)* equal(nil,v).
% 0.78/1.00  64[0:Inp] ssList(u) ||  -> segmentP(u,u)*.
% 0.78/1.00  65[0:Inp] ssList(u) ||  -> segmentP(u,nil)*.
% 0.78/1.00  67[0:Inp] || equal(skc5,nil)** -> equal(nil,skc4).
% 0.78/1.00  68[0:Inp] || neq(skc5,nil)* -> neq(skc4,nil).
% 0.78/1.00  69[0:Inp] || neq(skc5,nil) -> segmentP(skc5,skc4)*.
% 0.78/1.00  70[0:Inp] || SkP0(skc4,skc5) -> neq(skc5,nil)*.
% 0.78/1.00  71[0:Inp] || equal(nil,u) -> SkP0(u,v)*.
% 0.78/1.00  154[0:Inp] ssList(u) || neq(u,nil) segmentP(skc4,u) segmentP(skc5,u)* SkP0(skc4,skc5) -> .
% 0.78/1.00  187[0:Inp] ssList(u) ssList(v) || equal(tl(u),tl(v))* equal(hd(u),hd(v)) -> equal(u,v) equal(nil,v) equal(nil,u).
% 0.78/1.00  231[0:Res:2.0,154.0] || neq(skc4,nil) segmentP(skc5,skc4)* segmentP(skc4,skc4) SkP0(skc4,skc5) -> .
% 0.78/1.00  283[0:Res:2.0,64.0] ||  -> segmentP(skc4,skc4)*.
% 0.78/1.00  285[0:Res:2.0,187.1] ssList(u) || equal(tl(skc4),tl(u))* equal(hd(skc4),hd(u)) -> equal(nil,u) equal(skc4,u) equal(nil,skc4).
% 0.78/1.00  403[0:Res:1.0,154.0] || neq(skc5,nil) segmentP(skc5,skc5)* segmentP(skc4,skc5) SkP0(skc4,skc5) -> .
% 0.78/1.00  455[0:Res:1.0,64.0] ||  -> segmentP(skc5,skc5)*.
% 0.78/1.00  456[0:Res:1.0,65.0] ||  -> segmentP(skc5,nil)*.
% 0.78/1.00  457[0:Res:1.0,187.1] ssList(u) || equal(tl(skc5),tl(u))* equal(hd(skc5),hd(u)) -> equal(nil,u) equal(skc5,u) equal(skc5,nil).
% 0.78/1.00  550[0:MRR:231.2,283.0] || SkP0(skc4,skc5) segmentP(skc5,skc4)* neq(skc4,nil) -> .
% 0.78/1.00  551[0:MRR:403.0,403.1,70.1,455.0] || SkP0(skc4,skc5) segmentP(skc4,skc5)* -> .
% 0.78/1.00  562[1:Spt:457.5] ||  -> equal(skc5,nil)**.
% 0.78/1.00  567[1:Rew:562.0,551.0] || SkP0(skc4,nil) segmentP(skc4,skc5)* -> .
% 0.78/1.00  575[1:Rew:562.0,67.0] || equal(nil,nil)* -> equal(nil,skc4).
% 0.78/1.00  722[1:Obv:575.0] ||  -> equal(nil,skc4)**.
% 0.78/1.00  746[1:Rew:722.0,71.0] || equal(skc4,u) -> SkP0(u,v)*.
% 0.78/1.00  794[1:Rew:722.0,562.0] ||  -> equal(skc5,skc4)**.
% 0.78/1.00  847[1:Rew:794.0,567.1,722.0,567.0] || SkP0(skc4,skc4) segmentP(skc4,skc4)* -> .
% 0.78/1.00  848[1:MRR:847.1,283.0] || SkP0(skc4,skc4)* -> .
% 0.78/1.00  1044[1:Res:746.1,848.0] || equal(skc4,skc4)* -> .
% 0.78/1.00  1045[1:Obv:1044.0] ||  -> .
% 0.78/1.00  1046[1:Spt:1045.0,457.5,562.0] || equal(skc5,nil)** -> .
% 0.78/1.00  1047[1:Spt:1045.0,457.0,457.1,457.2,457.3,457.4] ssList(u) || equal(tl(skc5),tl(u))* equal(hd(skc5),hd(u)) -> equal(nil,u) equal(skc5,u).
% 0.78/1.00  1062[2:Spt:285.5] ||  -> equal(nil,skc4)**.
% 0.78/1.00  1074[2:Rew:1062.0,456.0] ||  -> segmentP(skc5,skc4)*.
% 0.78/1.00  1079[2:Rew:1062.0,1046.0] || equal(skc5,skc4)** -> .
% 0.78/1.00  1099[2:Rew:1062.0,58.1] ||  -> SkP0(u,v)* equal(skc4,v).
% 0.78/1.00  1103[2:Rew:1062.0,70.1] || SkP0(skc4,skc5) -> neq(skc5,skc4)*.
% 0.78/1.00  1104[2:Rew:1062.0,68.0] || neq(skc5,skc4)* -> neq(skc4,nil).
% 0.78/1.00  1106[2:Rew:1062.0,550.2] || SkP0(skc4,skc5) segmentP(skc5,skc4)* neq(skc4,skc4) -> .
% 0.78/1.00  1184[2:Rew:1062.0,1104.1] || neq(skc5,skc4)* -> neq(skc4,skc4).
% 0.78/1.00  1221[2:MRR:1106.1,1074.0] || SkP0(skc4,skc5) neq(skc4,skc4)* -> .
% 0.78/1.00  1261[3:Spt:1103.0] || SkP0(skc4,skc5)* -> .
% 0.78/1.00  1262[3:Res:1099.0,1261.0] ||  -> equal(skc5,skc4)**.
% 0.78/1.00  1263[3:MRR:1262.0,1079.0] ||  -> .
% 0.78/1.00  1264[3:Spt:1263.0,1103.0,1261.0] ||  -> SkP0(skc4,skc5)*.
% 0.78/1.00  1265[3:Spt:1263.0,1103.1] ||  -> neq(skc5,skc4)*.
% 0.78/1.00  1266[3:MRR:1184.0,1265.0] ||  -> neq(skc4,skc4)*.
% 0.78/1.00  1267[3:MRR:1221.0,1221.1,1264.0,1266.0] ||  -> .
% 0.78/1.00  1269[2:Spt:1267.0,285.5,1062.0] || equal(nil,skc4)** -> .
% 0.78/1.00  1270[2:Spt:1267.0,285.0,285.1,285.2,285.3,285.4] ssList(u) || equal(tl(skc4),tl(u))* equal(hd(skc4),hd(u)) -> equal(nil,u) equal(skc4,u).
% 0.78/1.00  1285[3:Spt:154.0,154.1,154.2,154.3] ssList(u) || neq(u,nil) segmentP(skc4,u) segmentP(skc5,u)* -> .
% 0.78/1.00  1290[4:Spt:70.1] ||  -> neq(skc5,nil)*.
% 0.78/1.00  1291[4:MRR:69.0,1290.0] ||  -> segmentP(skc5,skc4)*.
% 0.78/1.00  1292[4:MRR:68.0,1290.0] ||  -> neq(skc4,nil)*.
% 0.78/1.00  1321[4:Res:1291.0,1285.3] ssList(skc4) || neq(skc4,nil) segmentP(skc4,skc4)* -> .
% 0.78/1.00  1358[4:SSi:1321.0,2.0] || neq(skc4,nil) segmentP(skc4,skc4)* -> .
% 0.78/1.00  1359[4:MRR:1358.1,283.0] || neq(skc4,nil)* -> .
% 0.78/1.00  1360[4:MRR:1359.0,1292.0] ||  -> .
% 0.78/1.00  1362[4:Spt:1360.0,70.1,1290.0] || neq(skc5,nil)* -> .
% 0.78/1.00  1363[4:Spt:1360.0,70.0] || SkP0(skc4,skc5)* -> .
% 0.78/1.00  1391[4:Res:58.0,1363.0] ||  -> equal(skc5,nil)**.
% 0.78/1.00  1392[4:MRR:1391.0,1046.0] ||  -> .
% 0.78/1.00  1393[3:Spt:1392.0,154.4] || SkP0(skc4,skc5)* -> .
% 0.78/1.00  1394[3:Res:58.0,1393.0] ||  -> equal(skc5,nil)**.
% 0.78/1.00  1395[3:MRR:1394.0,1046.0] ||  -> .
% 0.78/1.00  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.78/1.00  Formulae used in the proof : co1 ax55 ax57 ax77
% 0.78/1.00  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------