TSTP Solution File: SWC051-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SWC051-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:27:18 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 27 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 27 RR)
% Number of literals : 48 ( 4 equ; 26 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ neq(X1,nil)
| ~ rearsegP(sk2,X1)
| ~ rearsegP(sk1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).
cnf(co1_10,negated_conjecture,
( neq(sk3,nil)
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_10) ).
cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
neq(sk2,nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).
cnf(co1_11,negated_conjecture,
( rearsegP(sk4,sk3)
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_11) ).
cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
cnf(co1_1,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_1) ).
cnf(clause59,axiom,
( rearsegP(X1,X1)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause59) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ neq(X1,nil)
| ~ rearsegP(sk2,X1)
| ~ rearsegP(sk1,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( neq(sk3,nil)
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
neq(sk2,nil),
co1_7 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
co1_5 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( rearsegP(sk4,sk3)
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ neq(X1,nil)
| ~ rearsegP(sk2,X1)
| ~ rearsegP(sk1,X1) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
co1_6 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( neq(sk3,nil)
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
neq(sk4,nil),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( rearsegP(sk4,sk3)
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk1),
co1_1 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( ~ neq(X1,nil)
| ~ rearsegP(sk3,X1)
| ~ rearsegP(sk4,X1)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
neq(sk3,nil),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
rearsegP(sk4,sk3),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_16])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk3),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( rearsegP(X1,X1)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause59]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ rearsegP(sk3,sk3),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( rearsegP(X1,X1)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
c_0_23 ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_22])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.10 % Problem : SWC051-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.02/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.31 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % DateTime : Sun May 19 02:39:38 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.44 Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.47 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.16/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.47 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47 # new_bool_3 with pid 15669 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.16/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.47 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.47 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.47 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.47 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 15672 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.16/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.47 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.47 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.47 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.47 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47 # Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.47 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.47
% 0.16/0.47 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.47 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.47 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.47 # Parsed axioms : 196
% 0.16/0.47 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 156
% 0.16/0.47 # Initial clauses : 40
% 0.16/0.47 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Initial clauses in saturation : 40
% 0.16/0.47 # Processed clauses : 66
% 0.16/0.47 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.16/0.47 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # ...remaining for further processing : 64
% 0.16/0.47 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 6
% 0.16/0.47 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Generated clauses : 13
% 0.16/0.47 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 11
% 0.16/0.47 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.16/0.47 # Paramodulations : 8
% 0.16/0.47 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Equation resolutions : 6
% 0.16/0.47 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Total rewrite steps : 18
% 0.16/0.47 # ...of those cached : 10
% 0.16/0.47 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.47 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.47 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.47 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.47 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.47 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.47 # Current number of processed clauses : 21
% 0.16/0.47 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 0.16/0.47 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.16/0.47 # Non-unit-clauses : 10
% 0.16/0.47 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 21
% 0.16/0.47 # ...number of literals in the above : 82
% 0.16/0.47 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Current number of archived clauses : 38
% 0.16/0.47 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 110
% 0.16/0.47 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 35
% 0.16/0.47 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.16/0.47 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.16/0.47 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.47 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3167
% 0.16/0.47 # Search garbage collected termcells : 920
% 0.16/0.47
% 0.16/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.47 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.16/0.47 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.47 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.16/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1936 pages
% 0.16/0.47
% 0.16/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.47 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.16/0.47 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.16/0.47 # Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.16/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1896 pages
% 0.16/0.47 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------