TSTP Solution File: SWC049+1 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : SWC049+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:38:25 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.52s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   58 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  325 (  96 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   34 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  422 ( 155   ~; 132   |; 111   &)
%                                         (   9 <=>;  15  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (  10 usr;   8 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   58 (  32   !;  26   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f322,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f219,f237,f243,f244,f249,f305,f318,f321]) ).

fof(f321,plain,
    spl9_14,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f320]) ).

fof(f320,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl9_14 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f319,f155]) ).

fof(f155,plain,
    ssList(sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f134,plain,
    ( ssList(sK0)
    & ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
      | ( neq(sK2,nil)
        & rearsegP(sK3,sK2) ) )
    & ssList(sK3)
    & ( nil = sK2
      | nil != sK3 )
    & ( nil != sK0
      | nil != sK1 )
    & ! [X4] :
        ( ~ neq(X4,nil)
        | ~ rearsegP(sK1,X4)
        | ~ rearsegP(sK0,X4)
        | ~ ssList(X4) )
    & sK1 = sK3
    & sK0 = sK2
    & ssList(sK2)
    & ssList(sK1) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f111,f133,f132,f131,f130]) ).

fof(f130,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
        & ? [X1] :
            ( ? [X2] :
                ( ? [X3] :
                    ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                      | ( neq(X2,nil)
                        & rearsegP(X3,X2) ) )
                    & ssList(X3)
                    & ( nil = X2
                      | nil != X3 )
                    & ( nil != X0
                      | nil != X1 )
                    & ! [X4] :
                        ( ~ neq(X4,nil)
                        | ~ rearsegP(X1,X4)
                        | ~ rearsegP(X0,X4)
                        | ~ ssList(X4) )
                    & X1 = X3
                    & X0 = X2 )
                & ssList(X2) )
            & ssList(X1) ) )
   => ( ssList(sK0)
      & ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                    | ( neq(X2,nil)
                      & rearsegP(X3,X2) ) )
                  & ssList(X3)
                  & ( nil = X2
                    | nil != X3 )
                  & ( nil != sK0
                    | nil != X1 )
                  & ! [X4] :
                      ( ~ neq(X4,nil)
                      | ~ rearsegP(X1,X4)
                      | ~ rearsegP(sK0,X4)
                      | ~ ssList(X4) )
                  & X1 = X3
                  & sK0 = X2 )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f131,plain,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( ? [X2] :
            ( ? [X3] :
                ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                  | ( neq(X2,nil)
                    & rearsegP(X3,X2) ) )
                & ssList(X3)
                & ( nil = X2
                  | nil != X3 )
                & ( nil != sK0
                  | nil != X1 )
                & ! [X4] :
                    ( ~ neq(X4,nil)
                    | ~ rearsegP(X1,X4)
                    | ~ rearsegP(sK0,X4)
                    | ~ ssList(X4) )
                & X1 = X3
                & sK0 = X2 )
            & ssList(X2) )
        & ssList(X1) )
   => ( ? [X2] :
          ( ? [X3] :
              ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                | ( neq(X2,nil)
                  & rearsegP(X3,X2) ) )
              & ssList(X3)
              & ( nil = X2
                | nil != X3 )
              & ( nil != sK0
                | nil != sK1 )
              & ! [X4] :
                  ( ~ neq(X4,nil)
                  | ~ rearsegP(sK1,X4)
                  | ~ rearsegP(sK0,X4)
                  | ~ ssList(X4) )
              & sK1 = X3
              & sK0 = X2 )
          & ssList(X2) )
      & ssList(sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f132,plain,
    ( ? [X2] :
        ( ? [X3] :
            ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
              | ( neq(X2,nil)
                & rearsegP(X3,X2) ) )
            & ssList(X3)
            & ( nil = X2
              | nil != X3 )
            & ( nil != sK0
              | nil != sK1 )
            & ! [X4] :
                ( ~ neq(X4,nil)
                | ~ rearsegP(sK1,X4)
                | ~ rearsegP(sK0,X4)
                | ~ ssList(X4) )
            & sK1 = X3
            & sK0 = X2 )
        & ssList(X2) )
   => ( ? [X3] :
          ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
            | ( neq(sK2,nil)
              & rearsegP(X3,sK2) ) )
          & ssList(X3)
          & ( nil = sK2
            | nil != X3 )
          & ( nil != sK0
            | nil != sK1 )
          & ! [X4] :
              ( ~ neq(X4,nil)
              | ~ rearsegP(sK1,X4)
              | ~ rearsegP(sK0,X4)
              | ~ ssList(X4) )
          & sK1 = X3
          & sK0 = sK2 )
      & ssList(sK2) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f133,plain,
    ( ? [X3] :
        ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
          | ( neq(sK2,nil)
            & rearsegP(X3,sK2) ) )
        & ssList(X3)
        & ( nil = sK2
          | nil != X3 )
        & ( nil != sK0
          | nil != sK1 )
        & ! [X4] :
            ( ~ neq(X4,nil)
            | ~ rearsegP(sK1,X4)
            | ~ rearsegP(sK0,X4)
            | ~ ssList(X4) )
        & sK1 = X3
        & sK0 = sK2 )
   => ( ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
        | ( neq(sK2,nil)
          & rearsegP(sK3,sK2) ) )
      & ssList(sK3)
      & ( nil = sK2
        | nil != sK3 )
      & ( nil != sK0
        | nil != sK1 )
      & ! [X4] :
          ( ~ neq(X4,nil)
          | ~ rearsegP(sK1,X4)
          | ~ rearsegP(sK0,X4)
          | ~ ssList(X4) )
      & sK1 = sK3
      & sK0 = sK2 ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f111,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
      & ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                    | ( neq(X2,nil)
                      & rearsegP(X3,X2) ) )
                  & ssList(X3)
                  & ( nil = X2
                    | nil != X3 )
                  & ( nil != X0
                    | nil != X1 )
                  & ! [X4] :
                      ( ~ neq(X4,nil)
                      | ~ rearsegP(X1,X4)
                      | ~ rearsegP(X0,X4)
                      | ~ ssList(X4) )
                  & X1 = X3
                  & X0 = X2 )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f110]) ).

fof(f110,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ! [X4] :
                      ( ~ neq(X4,nil)
                      | ~ rearsegP(X1,X4)
                      | ~ rearsegP(X0,X4)
                      | ~ ssList(X4) )
                  & X0 = X2
                  & ( nil != X0
                    | nil != X1 )
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                    | ( neq(X2,nil)
                      & rearsegP(X3,X2) ) )
                  & ( nil = X2
                    | nil != X3 )
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ssList(X3)
                   => ( ? [X4] :
                          ( ssList(X4)
                          & neq(X4,nil)
                          & rearsegP(X0,X4)
                          & rearsegP(X1,X4) )
                      | X0 != X2
                      | ( nil = X1
                        & nil = X0 )
                      | X1 != X3
                      | ( neq(X3,nil)
                        & ( ~ rearsegP(X3,X2)
                          | ~ neq(X2,nil) ) )
                      | ( nil = X3
                        & nil != X2 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                 => ( ? [X4] :
                        ( ssList(X4)
                        & neq(X4,nil)
                        & rearsegP(X0,X4)
                        & rearsegP(X1,X4) )
                    | X0 != X2
                    | ( nil = X1
                      & nil = X0 )
                    | X1 != X3
                    | ( neq(X3,nil)
                      & ( ~ rearsegP(X3,X2)
                        | ~ neq(X2,nil) ) )
                    | ( nil = X3
                      & nil != X2 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(f319,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(sK2)
    | spl9_14 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f317,f170]) ).

fof(f170,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( rearsegP(X0,X0)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f124]) ).

fof(f124,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ssList(X0)
      | rearsegP(X0,X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f49]) ).

fof(f49,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => rearsegP(X0,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax49) ).

fof(f317,plain,
    ( ~ rearsegP(sK2,sK2)
    | spl9_14 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f315]) ).

fof(f315,plain,
    ( spl9_14
  <=> rearsegP(sK2,sK2) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_14])]) ).

fof(f318,plain,
    ( ~ spl9_14
    | ~ spl9_8
    | ~ spl9_5 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f313,f230,f246,f315]) ).

fof(f246,plain,
    ( spl9_8
  <=> neq(sK2,nil) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_8])]) ).

fof(f230,plain,
    ( spl9_5
  <=> rearsegP(sK3,sK2) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_5])]) ).

fof(f313,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK2,nil)
    | ~ rearsegP(sK2,sK2)
    | ~ spl9_5 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f312,f155]) ).

fof(f312,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(sK2)
    | ~ rearsegP(sK2,sK2)
    | ~ neq(sK2,nil)
    | ~ spl9_5 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f232,f200]) ).

fof(f200,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ~ rearsegP(sK3,X4)
      | ~ rearsegP(sK2,X4)
      | ~ neq(X4,nil)
      | ~ ssList(X4) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f158,f157,f156]) ).

fof(f156,plain,
    sK0 = sK2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f157,plain,
    sK1 = sK3,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f158,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ~ neq(X4,nil)
      | ~ rearsegP(sK1,X4)
      | ~ rearsegP(sK0,X4)
      | ~ ssList(X4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f232,plain,
    ( rearsegP(sK3,sK2)
    | ~ spl9_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f230]) ).

fof(f305,plain,
    ( spl9_2
    | ~ spl9_4
    | spl9_6 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f304]) ).

fof(f304,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl9_2
    | ~ spl9_4
    | spl9_6 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f303,f161]) ).

fof(f161,plain,
    ssList(sK3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f303,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(sK3)
    | spl9_2
    | ~ spl9_4
    | spl9_6 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f302,f218]) ).

fof(f218,plain,
    ( nil != sK3
    | spl9_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f216]) ).

fof(f216,plain,
    ( spl9_2
  <=> nil = sK3 ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_2])]) ).

fof(f302,plain,
    ( nil = sK3
    | ~ ssList(sK3)
    | ~ spl9_4
    | spl9_6 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f295,f226]) ).

fof(f226,plain,
    ( ssList(nil)
    | ~ spl9_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f225]) ).

fof(f225,plain,
    ( spl9_4
  <=> ssList(nil) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_4])]) ).

fof(f295,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(nil)
    | nil = sK3
    | ~ ssList(sK3)
    | spl9_6 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f183,f236]) ).

fof(f236,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
    | spl9_6 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f234]) ).

fof(f234,plain,
    ( spl9_6
  <=> neq(sK3,nil) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_6])]) ).

fof(f183,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( neq(X0,X1)
      | ~ ssList(X0)
      | X0 = X1
      | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f142]) ).

fof(f142,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ssList(X0)
      | ! [X1] :
          ( ~ ssList(X1)
          | ( ( X0 != X1
              | ~ neq(X0,X1) )
            & ( neq(X0,X1)
              | X0 = X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f109]) ).

fof(f109,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ssList(X0)
      | ! [X1] :
          ( ~ ssList(X1)
          | ( X0 != X1
          <=> neq(X0,X1) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ( X0 != X1
          <=> neq(X0,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax15) ).

fof(f249,plain,
    ( spl9_8
    | ~ spl9_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f163,f234,f246]) ).

fof(f163,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
    | neq(sK2,nil) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f244,plain,
    spl9_4,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f193,f225]) ).

fof(f193,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax17) ).

fof(f243,plain,
    ( spl9_1
    | ~ spl9_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f160,f216,f212]) ).

fof(f212,plain,
    ( spl9_1
  <=> nil = sK2 ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_1])]) ).

fof(f160,plain,
    ( nil != sK3
    | nil = sK2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f237,plain,
    ( spl9_5
    | ~ spl9_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f162,f234,f230]) ).

fof(f162,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
    | rearsegP(sK3,sK2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f219,plain,
    ( ~ spl9_1
    | ~ spl9_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f199,f216,f212]) ).

fof(f199,plain,
    ( nil != sK3
    | nil != sK2 ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f159,f156,f157]) ).

fof(f159,plain,
    ( nil != sK0
    | nil != sK1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : SWC049+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 18:02:56 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.51  % (10484)dis+1010_1:50_awrs=decay:awrsf=128:nwc=10.0:s2pl=no:sp=frequency:ss=axioms:i=39:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/39Mi)
% 0.20/0.51  % (10479)lrs+10_1:1_gsp=on:sd=1:sgt=32:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=13:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/13Mi)
% 0.20/0.51  % (10502)dis+1010_2:3_fs=off:fsr=off:nm=0:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2agt=32:i=82:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/82Mi)
% 0.20/0.52  % (10484)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.52  % (10482)lrs+10_1:1024_nm=0:nwc=5.0:ss=axioms:i=13:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/13Mi)
% 0.20/0.52  % (10498)ott+1010_1:1_sd=2:sos=on:sp=occurrence:ss=axioms:urr=on:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.20/0.52  % (10483)dis+21_1:1_av=off:sos=on:sp=frequency:ss=included:to=lpo:i=15:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/15Mi)
% 0.20/0.52  % (10484)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.52  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.52  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.52  % (10484)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52  % (10484)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.52  % (10484)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.52  % (10484)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.52  
% 0.20/0.52  % (10484)Memory used [KB]: 6140
% 0.20/0.52  % (10484)Time elapsed: 0.108 s
% 0.20/0.52  % (10484)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.20/0.52  % (10484)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52  % (10484)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52  % (10469)Success in time 0.172 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------