TSTP Solution File: SWC040-1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : SWC040-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:22:45 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.10s 0.36s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (  12 unt;   0 nHn;  15 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   18 (  17 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
    nil != sk1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).

cnf(co1_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | nil != sk4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).

cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).

cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
    nil = sk2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).

cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    nil != sk1,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | nil != sk4 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    co1_6 ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    nil = sk2,
    co1_5 ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    nil != sk1,
    c_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    co1_7 ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | nil != sk4 ),
    c_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    sk4 = nil,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    sk3 != nil,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12])]),c_0_13]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.07  % Problem    : SWC040-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.08  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.07/0.26  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.26  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.26  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.26  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.26  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.26  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.07/0.26  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.07/0.26  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 03:11:07 EDT 2024
% 0.07/0.26  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.10/0.35  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.35  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.36  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.10/0.36  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.36  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.36  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.36  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.36  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.36  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.36  # new_bool_3 with pid 24917 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.36  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.10/0.36  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.36  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.36  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.36  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.36  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.10/0.36  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.36  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.10/0.36  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.36  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 24921 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.36  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.10/0.36  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.36  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.36  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.36  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.36  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.10/0.36  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.36  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.10/0.36  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.36  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.10/0.36  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.10/0.36  
% 0.10/0.36  # Proof found!
% 0.10/0.36  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.10/0.36  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.10/0.36  # Parsed axioms                        : 198
% 0.10/0.36  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 164
% 0.10/0.36  # Initial clauses                      : 34
% 0.10/0.36  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.10/0.36  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 34
% 0.10/0.36  # Processed clauses                    : 6
% 0.10/0.36  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.10/0.36  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.10/0.36  # ...remaining for further processing  : 5
% 0.10/0.36  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.10/0.36  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.10/0.36  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.10/0.36  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.10/0.36  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.10/0.36  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.10/0.36  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.10/0.36  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.10/0.36  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.10/0.36  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.10/0.36  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.10/0.36  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.10/0.36  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.10/0.36  # Total rewrite steps                  : 3
% 0.10/0.36  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.10/0.36  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.10/0.36  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.10/0.36  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.10/0.36  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.10/0.36  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.10/0.36  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.10/0.36  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.10/0.36  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.10/0.36  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.10/0.36  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.10/0.36  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.10/0.36  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.10/0.36  # Current number of processed clauses  : 4
% 0.10/0.36  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.10/0.36  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.10/0.36  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.10/0.36  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.10/0.36  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 29
% 0.10/0.36  # ...number of literals in the above   : 91
% 0.10/0.36  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.10/0.36  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.10/0.36  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.10/0.36  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.10/0.36  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.10/0.36  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.10/0.36  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.10/0.36  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.10/0.36  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.10/0.36  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.10/0.36  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.10/0.36  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2513
% 0.10/0.36  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 927
% 0.10/0.36  
% 0.10/0.36  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.36  # User time                : 0.001 s
% 0.10/0.36  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.10/0.36  # Total time               : 0.004 s
% 0.10/0.36  # Maximum resident set size: 1932 pages
% 0.10/0.36  
% 0.10/0.36  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.36  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.10/0.36  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.10/0.36  # Total time               : 0.007 s
% 0.10/0.36  # Maximum resident set size: 1876 pages
% 0.10/0.36  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.10/0.36  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------