TSTP Solution File: SWC026-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SWC026-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:22:40 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 7 unt; 2 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 31 ( 30 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_12,negated_conjecture,
( nil != sk1
| nil != sk2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_12) ).
cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
( nil = sk4
| nil != sk3 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).
cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
( nil = sk3
| nil != sk4 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).
cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
cnf(co1_9,negated_conjecture,
( nil = sk2
| nil = sk1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( nil != sk1
| nil != sk2 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( nil = sk4
| nil != sk3 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( nil != sk1
| nil != sk2 ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
co1_5 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( nil = sk3
| nil != sk4 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( nil = sk4
| nil != sk3 ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
co1_6 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( sk1 != nil
| sk4 != nil ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( nil = sk3
| nil != sk4 ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
sk1 != nil,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( nil = sk2
| nil = sk1 ),
co1_9 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
sk4 != nil,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_12]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_9]),c_0_15]),c_0_17]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : SWC026-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.10/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Sun May 19 03:34:53 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.43 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # new_bool_1 with pid 3639 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.43 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 3642 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.43 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.43
% 0.16/0.43 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.43 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.43 # Parsed axioms : 197
% 0.16/0.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 168
% 0.16/0.43 # Initial clauses : 29
% 0.16/0.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.16/0.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 27
% 0.16/0.43 # Processed clauses : 6
% 0.16/0.43 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 5
% 0.16/0.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.16/0.43 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.16/0.43 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Total rewrite steps : 4
% 0.16/0.43 # ...of those cached : 2
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.16/0.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.16/0.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.16/0.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 21
% 0.16/0.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 67
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.16/0.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.16/0.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.16/0.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.16/0.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.16/0.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2385
% 0.16/0.43 # Search garbage collected termcells : 930
% 0.16/0.43
% 0.16/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.43 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.43 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 2020 pages
% 0.16/0.43
% 0.16/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.43 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.16/0.43 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1900 pages
% 0.16/0.43 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.16/0.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------