TSTP Solution File: SWC026+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SWC026+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:27:01 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 61 ( 48 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 18 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 75 ( 27 ~; 23 |; 17 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ( nil != X4
& nil = X3 )
| ( nil != X3
& nil = X4 )
| ( ( nil != X2
| nil = X1 )
& ( nil != X1
| nil = X2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ( nil != X4
& nil = X3 )
| ( nil != X3
& nil = X4 )
| ( ( nil != X2
| nil = X1 )
& ( nil != X1
| nil = X2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1])]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
( ssList(esk1_0)
& ssList(esk2_0)
& ssList(esk3_0)
& ssList(esk4_0)
& esk2_0 = esk4_0
& esk1_0 = esk3_0
& ( nil = esk4_0
| nil != esk3_0 )
& ( nil = esk3_0
| nil != esk4_0 )
& ( nil = esk1_0
| nil = esk2_0 )
& ( nil != esk2_0
| nil = esk2_0 )
& ( nil = esk1_0
| nil != esk1_0 )
& ( nil != esk2_0
| nil != esk1_0 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( nil != esk2_0
| nil != esk1_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
esk2_0 = esk4_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( nil = esk4_0
| nil != esk3_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 = esk3_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( esk1_0 != nil
| esk4_0 != nil ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( nil = esk3_0
| nil != esk4_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 != nil,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( nil = esk1_0
| nil = esk2_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
esk4_0 != nil,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_6]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_4]),c_0_9]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SWC026+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Sun May 19 02:48:23 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.45 Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.46 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # new_bool_3 with pid 2563 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.46 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with 163s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with pid 2566 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.46 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with 163s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.46 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/0.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 96
% 0.17/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 79
% 0.17/0.46 # Initial clauses : 35
% 0.17/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.17/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 33
% 0.17/0.46 # Processed clauses : 14
% 0.17/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.17/0.46 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 11
% 0.17/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.17/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.17/0.46 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 8
% 0.17/0.46 # ...of those cached : 4
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 10
% 0.17/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.17/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.17/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 19
% 0.17/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 71
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.17/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.17/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.17/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.17/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.17/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3260
% 0.17/0.46 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1237
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.46 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.46 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1888 pages
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.46 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.17/0.46 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1820 pages
% 0.17/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------