TSTP Solution File: SWC013+1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : SWC013+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:22:35 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  166 (  53 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   38 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  217 (  84   ~;  79   |;  34   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  18  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   23 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   45 (   0 sgn  25   !;   8   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ssList(X3)
             => ! [X4] :
                  ( ssList(X4)
                 => ( X2 != X4
                    | X1 != X3
                    | ( ( ~ neq(X2,nil)
                        | ? [X5] :
                            ( ssList(X5)
                            & X3 != X5
                            & ? [X6] :
                                ( ssItem(X6)
                                & cons(X6,nil) = X5
                                & hd(X4) = X6
                                & neq(nil,X4) ) )
                        | ? [X7] :
                            ( ssList(X7)
                            & X1 = X7
                            & ? [X8] :
                                ( ssItem(X8)
                                & cons(X8,nil) = X7
                                & hd(X2) = X8
                                & neq(nil,X2) ) ) )
                      & ( ~ neq(X2,nil)
                        | neq(X4,nil) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(ax15,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ( neq(X1,X2)
          <=> X1 != X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax15) ).

fof(ax22,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ( nil != X1
       => ssItem(hd(X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax22) ).

fof(ax17,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax17) ).

fof(ax16,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssItem(X2)
         => ssList(cons(X2,X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax16) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                   => ( X2 != X4
                      | X1 != X3
                      | ( ( ~ neq(X2,nil)
                          | ? [X5] :
                              ( ssList(X5)
                              & X3 != X5
                              & ? [X6] :
                                  ( ssItem(X6)
                                  & cons(X6,nil) = X5
                                  & hd(X4) = X6
                                  & neq(nil,X4) ) )
                          | ? [X7] :
                              ( ssList(X7)
                              & X1 = X7
                              & ? [X8] :
                                  ( ssItem(X8)
                                  & cons(X8,nil) = X7
                                  & hd(X2) = X8
                                  & neq(nil,X2) ) ) )
                        & ( ~ neq(X2,nil)
                          | neq(X4,nil) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X13,X14,X15,X16] :
      ( ssList(esk1_0)
      & ssList(esk2_0)
      & ssList(esk3_0)
      & ssList(esk4_0)
      & esk2_0 = esk4_0
      & esk1_0 = esk3_0
      & ( neq(esk2_0,nil)
        | neq(esk2_0,nil) )
      & ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
        | neq(esk2_0,nil) )
      & ( neq(esk2_0,nil)
        | ~ ssList(X13)
        | esk3_0 = X13
        | ~ ssItem(X14)
        | cons(X14,nil) != X13
        | hd(esk4_0) != X14
        | ~ neq(nil,esk4_0) )
      & ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
        | ~ ssList(X13)
        | esk3_0 = X13
        | ~ ssItem(X14)
        | cons(X14,nil) != X13
        | hd(esk4_0) != X14
        | ~ neq(nil,esk4_0) )
      & ( neq(esk2_0,nil)
        | ~ ssList(X15)
        | esk1_0 != X15
        | ~ ssItem(X16)
        | cons(X16,nil) != X15
        | hd(esk2_0) != X16
        | ~ neq(nil,esk2_0) )
      & ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
        | ~ ssList(X15)
        | esk1_0 != X15
        | ~ ssItem(X16)
        | cons(X16,nil) != X15
        | hd(esk2_0) != X16
        | ~ neq(nil,esk2_0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( neq(esk2_0,nil)
    | neq(esk2_0,nil) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | esk1_0 != X1
    | ~ ssItem(X2)
    | cons(X2,nil) != X1
    | hd(esk2_0) != X2
    | ~ neq(nil,esk2_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 = esk4_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    neq(esk2_0,nil),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ( neq(X1,X2)
          <=> X1 != X2 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax15]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk3_0 = X1
    | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X2)
    | cons(X2,nil) != X1
    | hd(esk4_0) != X2
    | ~ neq(nil,esk4_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 = esk3_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons(hd(esk2_0),nil) != esk1_0
    | ~ ssList(cons(hd(esk2_0),nil))
    | ~ neq(nil,esk2_0)
    | ~ ssItem(hd(esk2_0)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X19,X20] :
      ( ( ~ neq(X19,X20)
        | X19 != X20
        | ~ ssList(X20)
        | ~ ssList(X19) )
      & ( X19 = X20
        | neq(X19,X20)
        | ~ ssList(X20)
        | ~ ssList(X19) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ( nil != X1
       => ssItem(hd(X1)) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax22]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(cons(hd(esk2_0),nil))
    | ~ neq(nil,esk2_0)
    | ~ ssItem(hd(esk2_0)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_9]),c_0_9]),c_0_9]),c_0_10])])])]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | neq(X1,X2)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax17]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X26] :
      ( ~ ssList(X26)
      | nil = X26
      | ssItem(hd(X26)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk2_0 = nil
    | ~ ssList(cons(hd(esk2_0),nil))
    | ~ ssItem(hd(esk2_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( nil = X1
    | ssItem(hd(X1))
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X36,X37] :
      ( ~ ssList(X36)
      | ~ ssItem(X37)
      | ssList(cons(X37,X36)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax16])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk2_0 = nil
    | ~ ssList(cons(hd(esk2_0),nil)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ssList(cons(X2,X1))
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk2_0 = nil
    | ~ ssItem(hd(esk2_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ neq(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 = nil,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_23]),c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ neq(X1,X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    neq(nil,nil),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.13  % Problem    : SWC013+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.06/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.35  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 03:33:23 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.50  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # new_bool_3 with pid 28006 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.50  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with 163s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with pid 28009 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.50  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with 163s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.50  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 96
% 0.19/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 67
% 0.19/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 51
% 0.19/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 51
% 0.19/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 93
% 0.19/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 5
% 0.19/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.19/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 87
% 0.19/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 8
% 0.19/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.19/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 6
% 0.19/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 18
% 0.19/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 15
% 0.19/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.19/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 13
% 0.19/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 8
% 0.19/0.50  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 43
% 0.19/0.50  # ...of those cached                   : 36
% 0.19/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 29
% 0.19/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 9
% 0.19/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.19/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 19
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 17
% 0.19/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 71
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 53
% 0.19/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 307
% 0.19/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 128
% 0.19/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
% 0.19/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22
% 0.19/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.19/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.19/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 5511
% 0.19/0.50  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 1579
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50  # User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.19/0.50  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1912 pages
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50  # User time                : 0.012 s
% 0.19/0.50  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1824 pages
% 0.19/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.50  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------