TSTP Solution File: SWC010-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SWC010-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:10:51 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.84s 1.14s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.84s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 25 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 25 RR)
% Number of literals : 57 ( 17 equ; 36 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).
cnf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
cnf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
neq(sk2,nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
cnf(c_57,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(X0,cons(X1,nil)),X2) != sk2
| app(X0,X2) != sk1
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| neq(sk2,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).
cnf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(X0,cons(X1,nil)),X2) != sk2
| app(X0,X2) != sk1
| ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_16) ).
cnf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| ssItem(sk5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_17) ).
cnf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| ssList(sk6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_18) ).
cnf(c_67,negated_conjecture,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| ssList(sk7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_19) ).
cnf(c_68,negated_conjecture,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| app(app(sk6,cons(sk5,nil)),sk7) = sk4 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_20) ).
cnf(c_69,negated_conjecture,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| app(sk6,sk7) = sk3 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_21) ).
cnf(c_418,negated_conjecture,
neq(sk2,nil),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_55]) ).
cnf(c_1610,plain,
( ~ neq(sk2,nil)
| ssList(sk7) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_67,c_53]) ).
cnf(c_1611,plain,
ssList(sk7),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1610,c_418]) ).
cnf(c_1612,plain,
( ~ neq(sk2,nil)
| ssList(sk6) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_53]) ).
cnf(c_1613,plain,
ssList(sk6),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1612,c_418]) ).
cnf(c_1614,plain,
( ~ neq(sk2,nil)
| ssItem(sk5) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_53]) ).
cnf(c_1615,plain,
ssItem(sk5),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1614,c_418]) ).
cnf(c_1710,plain,
( ~ neq(sk2,nil)
| app(sk6,sk7) = sk1 ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_53,c_54]) ).
cnf(c_1711,plain,
app(sk6,sk7) = sk1,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1710,c_418]) ).
cnf(c_1898,plain,
( ~ neq(sk2,nil)
| app(app(sk6,cons(sk5,nil)),sk7) = sk2 ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_53]) ).
cnf(c_1899,plain,
app(app(sk6,cons(sk5,nil)),sk7) = sk2,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1898,c_418]) ).
cnf(c_2454,plain,
( app(app(X0,cons(X1,nil)),X2) != sk2
| app(X0,X2) != sk1
| ~ neq(sk2,nil)
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_53]) ).
cnf(c_2455,plain,
( app(app(X0,cons(X1,nil)),X2) != sk2
| app(X0,X2) != sk1
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2454,c_418]) ).
cnf(c_9000,plain,
( app(sk6,sk7) != sk1
| ~ ssList(sk6)
| ~ ssList(sk7)
| ~ ssItem(sk5) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1899,c_2455]) ).
cnf(c_9001,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_9000,c_1615,c_1611,c_1613,c_1711]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SWC010-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.11 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Thu May 2 23:48:36 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.84/1.14 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.84/1.14 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.84/1.14
% 3.84/1.14 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 3.84/1.14
% 3.84/1.14 ------ iProver source info
% 3.84/1.14
% 3.84/1.14 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 3.84/1.14 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 3.84/1.14 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.84/1.14
% 3.84/1.14 ------ Parsing...successful
% 3.84/1.14
% 3.84/1.14
% 3.84/1.14
% 3.84/1.14 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 11 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 2 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 3.84/1.14
% 3.84/1.14 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 2 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 3.84/1.14
% 3.84/1.14 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.84/1.14 ------ Proving...
% 3.84/1.14 ------ Problem Properties
% 3.84/1.14
% 3.84/1.14
% 3.84/1.14 clauses 189
% 3.84/1.14 conjectures 4
% 3.84/1.14 EPR 61
% 3.84/1.14 Horn 161
% 3.84/1.14 unary 68
% 3.84/1.14 binary 21
% 3.84/1.14 lits 560
% 3.84/1.14 lits eq 77
% 3.84/1.14 fd_pure 0
% 3.84/1.14 fd_pseudo 0
% 3.84/1.14 fd_cond 16
% 3.84/1.14 fd_pseudo_cond 14
% 3.84/1.14 AC symbols 0
% 3.84/1.14
% 3.84/1.14 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 3.84/1.14
% 3.84/1.14 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.84/1.14
% 3.84/1.14
% 3.84/1.14 ------
% 3.84/1.14 Current options:
% 3.84/1.14 ------
% 3.84/1.14
% 3.84/1.14
% 3.84/1.14
% 3.84/1.14
% 3.84/1.14 ------ Proving...
% 3.84/1.14
% 3.84/1.14
% 3.84/1.14 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.84/1.14
% 3.84/1.14 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.84/1.14
% 3.84/1.14
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------