TSTP Solution File: SWC010-1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SWC010-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 21:56:21 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 80.90s 81.09s
% Output : Refutation 80.90s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 30 ( 10 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).
cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
neq(sk2,nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
cnf(co1_16,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssItem(X)
| ~ ssList(Y)
| ~ ssList(Z)
| app(app(Y,cons(X,nil)),Z) != sk2
| app(Y,Z) != sk1
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_16) ).
cnf(191,plain,
( ~ ssItem(X)
| ~ ssList(Y)
| ~ ssList(Z)
| app(app(Y,cons(X,nil)),Z) != sk2
| app(Y,Z) != sk1 ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_16,co1_7,co1_5,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(co1_17,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(sk5)
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_17) ).
cnf(193,plain,
ssItem(sk5),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_17,co1_7,co1_5,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(co1_18,negated_conjecture,
( ssList(sk6)
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_18) ).
cnf(195,plain,
ssList(sk6),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_18,co1_7,co1_5,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(co1_19,negated_conjecture,
( ssList(sk7)
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_19) ).
cnf(197,plain,
ssList(sk7),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_19,co1_7,co1_5,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(co1_20,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(sk6,cons(sk5,nil)),sk7) = sk4
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_20) ).
cnf(199,plain,
app(app(sk6,cons(sk5,nil)),sk7) = sk2,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_20,co1_7,co1_5,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(co1_21,negated_conjecture,
( app(sk6,sk7) = sk3
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_21) ).
cnf(201,plain,
app(sk6,sk7) = sk1,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_21,co1_7,co1_5,co1_6,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(64731,plain,
$false,
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[191,193,195,197,199,201]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SWC010-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 07:42:01 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.48 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.48 *
% 0.19/0.48 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.48 *
% 0.19/0.48 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.48 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.48 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.48 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.48 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.48 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.48 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.48 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.48 *
% 0.19/0.48 "."
% 0.19/0.48 *
% 0.19/0.48 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-12T07:42:01
% 0.19/0.48 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n027.cluster.edu at 2022-06-12T07:42:01
% 80.90/81.09
% 80.90/81.09
% 80.90/81.09 #||
% 80.90/81.09 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 80.90/81.09 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 80.90/81.09 ||#
% 80.90/81.09
% 80.90/81.09 ; Summary of computation:
% 80.90/81.09 ; 129727 formulas have been input or derived (from 182 formulas).
% 80.90/81.09 ; 64731 (50%) were retained. Of these,
% 80.90/81.09 ; 2847 ( 4%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 80.90/81.09 ; 61884 (96%) are still being kept.
% 80.90/81.09 ;
% 80.90/81.09 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 80.90/81.09 ; 0.039 0% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 80.90/81.09 ; 0.006 0% Assert (207 calls)
% 80.90/81.09 ; 6.733 8% Process new row (124,603 calls)
% 80.90/81.09 ; 65.386 81% Resolution (362 calls)
% 80.90/81.09 ; 0.061 0% Paramodulation (181 calls)
% 80.90/81.09 ; 0.032 0% Condensing (3,698 calls)
% 80.90/81.09 ; 0.072 0% Forward subsumption (3,698 calls)
% 80.90/81.09 ; 0.227 0% Backward subsumption (3,662 calls)
% 80.90/81.09 ; 0.003 0% Clause clause subsumption (1,458 calls)
% 80.90/81.09 ; 2.484 3% Forward simplification (124,603 calls)
% 80.90/81.09 ; 4.371 5% Backward simplification (64,724 calls)
% 80.90/81.09 ; 0.769 1% Ordering (125,858 calls)
% 80.90/81.09 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 80.90/81.09 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 80.90/81.09 ; 0.423 1% Other
% 80.90/81.09 ; 80.606 Total
% 80.90/81.09 ; 80.607 Real time
% 80.90/81.09 ;
% 80.90/81.09 ; Term-hash-array has 172,750 terms in all.
% 80.90/81.09 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 3,615 entries (3,615 at peak, 3,662 added, 47 deleted).
% 80.90/81.09 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 5,742 nodes (5,742 at peak, 6,086 added, 344 deleted).
% 80.90/81.09 ; Retrieved 12,473 possibly forward subsuming rows in 3,698 calls.
% 80.90/81.09 ; Retrieved 11,838 possibly backward subsumed rows in 3,662 calls.
% 80.90/81.09 ; Path-index has 168,742 entries (168,742 at peak, 172,845 added, 4,103 deleted).
% 80.90/81.09 ; Path-index has 8,940 nodes (8,940 at peak, 9,507 added, 567 deleted).
% 80.90/81.09 ; Trie-index has 168,742 entries (168,742 at peak, 172,845 added, 4,103 deleted).
% 80.90/81.09 ; Trie-index has 801,317 nodes (801,317 at peak, 813,050 added, 11,733 deleted).
% 80.90/81.09 ; Retrieved 113,471 generalization terms in 658,391 calls.
% 80.90/81.09 ; Retrieved 107,742 instance terms in 106,259 calls.
% 80.90/81.09 ; Retrieved 227,837,615 unifiable terms in 4,842,989 calls.
% 80.90/81.09 ;
% 80.90/81.09 ; The agenda of rows to process has 25 entries:
% 80.90/81.09 ; 3 with value 4 15 with value 16 1 with value 27
% 80.90/81.09 ; 1 with value 8 1 with value 21 1 with value 38
% 80.90/81.09 ; 3 with value 14
% 80.90/81.09 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 14 entries:
% 80.90/81.09 ; 7 with value 32 1 with value 35 3 with value 44
% 80.90/81.09 ; 1 with value 33 2 with value 40
% 80.90/81.09 ; The agenda of rows to give has 61689 entries:
% 80.90/81.09 ; 56 with value (4 5) 1829 with value (4 15) 7495 with value (4 25)
% 80.90/81.09 ; 2 with value (4 6) 1183 with value (4 16) 2502 with value (4 26)
% 80.90/81.09 ; 121 with value (4 7) 2549 with value (4 17) 3908 with value (4 27)
% 80.90/81.09 ; 192 with value (4 8) 3205 with value (4 18) 222 with value (4 28)
% 80.90/81.09 ; 333 with value (4 9) 246 with value (4 19) 576 with value (4 29)
% 80.90/81.09 ; 561 with value (4 10) 6897 with value (4 20) 2 with value (4 30)
% 80.90/81.09 ; 422 with value (4 11) 763 with value (4 21) 1 with value (4 31)
% 80.90/81.09 ; 258 with value (4 12) 14070 with value (4 22) 21 with value (4 33)
% 80.90/81.09 ; 987 with value (4 13) 2865 with value (4 23) 6 with value (4 39)
% 80.90/81.09 ; 703 with value (4 14) 9714 with value (4 24)
% 80.90/81.09 Evaluation took:
% 80.90/81.09 80.611 seconds of real time
% 80.90/81.09 79.266205 seconds of user run time
% 80.90/81.09 1.345145 seconds of system run time
% 80.90/81.09 [Run times include 10.29 seconds GC run time.]
% 80.90/81.09 0 calls to %EVAL
% 80.90/81.09 0 page faults and
% 80.90/81.09 6,183,234,072 bytes consed.
% 80.90/81.09 :PROOF-FOUND
% 80.90/81.09 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-12T07:43:21
% 80.90/81.09 :PROOF-FOUND
% 80.90/81.09 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------