TSTP Solution File: SWC002-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC002-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 21:58:49 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.01s 300.20s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SWC002-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 16:44:10 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.46 The process was started by sandbox2 on n019.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.46 Sun Jun 12 16:44:10 2022
% 0.20/0.46 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 28946.
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.46 set(auto).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.46 clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 list(usable).
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.46 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.20/0.46 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.20/0.46 clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.46 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.20/0.46 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.20/0.46 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.20/0.46 153 back subsumes 152.
% 0.20/0.46 163 back subsumes 157.
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.46 Following clause subsumed by 451 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ssItem(sk6)|neq(sk2,nil).
% 0.20/0.46 Following clause subsumed by 451 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ssList(sk7)|neq(sk2,nil).
% 0.20/0.46 Following clause subsumed by 451 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ssList(sk8)|neq(sk2,nil).
% 0.20/0.46 Following clause subsumed by 451 during input processing: 0 [demod,446] {-} app(app(sk7,cons(sk6,nil)),sk8)=sk2|neq(sk2,nil).
% 0.20/0.46 Following clause subsumed by 451 during input processing: 0 [demod,449] {-} app(sk7,sk8)=sk1|neq(sk2,nil).
% 0.20/0.46 451 back subsumes 267.
% 0.20/0.46 451 back subsumes 266.
% 0.20/0.46 451 back subsumes 265.
% 0.20/0.46 451 back subsumes 264.
% 0.20/0.46 451 back subsumes 136.
% 0.20/0.46 451 back subsumes 134.
% 0.20/0.46 451 back subsumes 133.
% 0.20/0.46 451 back subsumes 132.
% 0.20/0.46 Following clause subsumed by 452 during input processing: 0 [copy,452,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.46 452 back subsumes 358.
% 0.20/0.46 452 back subsumes 302.
% 0.20/0.46 452 back subsumes 301.
% 0.20/0.46 452 back subsumes 300.
% 0.20/0.46 452 back subsumes 290.
% 0.20/0.46 452 back subsumes 277.
% 0.20/0.46 452 back subsumes 276.
% 0.20/0.46 452 back subsumes 275.
% 0.20/0.46 452 back subsumes 230.
% 0.20/0.46 452 back subsumes 218.
% 0.20/0.46 452 back subsumes 217.
% 0.20/0.46 452 back subsumes 216.
% 0.20/0.46 452 back subsumes 215.
% 0.20/0.46 452 back subsumes 198.
% 0.20/0.46 452 back subsumes 195.
% 0.20/0.46 452 back subsumes 193.
% 0.20/0.46 452 back subsumes 189.
% 0.20/0.46 452 back subsumes 186.
% 0.20/0.46 452 back subsumes 163.
% 0.20/0.46 452 back subsumes 162.
% 0.20/0.46 452 back subsumes 161.
% 0.20/0.46 452 back subsumes 160.
% 0.20/0.46 452 back subsumes 159.
% 0.20/0.46 452 back subsumes 151.
% 0.20/0.46 452 back subsumes 150.
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.46/0.66
% 0.46/0.66 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.66
% 0.46/0.66 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.46/0.66
% 0.46/0.66
% 0.46/0.66 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.46/0.66
% 0.46/0.66 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.46/0.66 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.46/0.66 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.46/0.66 number of clauses in intial UL: 334
% 0.46/0.66 number of clauses initially in problem: 410
% 0.46/0.66 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 81
% 0.46/0.66 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 89
% 0.46/0.66 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.46/0.66 absolute distinct symbol count: 77
% 0.46/0.66 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.46/0.66 distinct function count: 47
% 0.46/0.66 distinct constant count: 10
% 0.46/0.66
% 0.46/0.66 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.46/0.66
% 0.46/0.66
% 0.46/0.66
% 0.46/0.66 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.46/0.66
% 0.46/0.66 =========== start of search ===========
% 300.01/300.20 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------