TSTP Solution File: SWB079+1 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : SWB079+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 18:59:49 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 270.39s 175.89s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SWB079+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun  1 05:15:36 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.60/0.60          ____       _                          
% 0.60/0.60    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.60/0.60   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.60/0.60  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.60/0.60  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.60/0.60  
% 0.60/0.60  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.60/0.60  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.60/0.60  
% 0.60/0.60  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.60/0.60  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.60/0.60  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.60/0.60  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.60/0.60  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.60/0.60  
% 0.60/0.60  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.60/0.60  
% 0.60/0.60  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.72/0.65  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 3.62/1.41  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 7.74/2.36  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.14/2.43  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 19.87/5.94  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 21.47/6.35  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 24.76/7.14  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 30.94/8.54  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 32.06/8.86  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 47.98/12.80  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 48.84/13.00  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 62.95/18.29  Prover 0: stopped
% 63.41/18.49  Prover 3: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 63.93/18.74  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 64.48/18.88  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 64.48/18.90  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 106.77/57.65  Prover 3: stopped
% 107.04/57.85  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete
% 107.72/58.15  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 114.11/60.93  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 114.45/61.05  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 161.57/101.65  Prover 2: stopped
% 161.78/101.85  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 162.59/102.17  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 167.88/104.33  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 175.64/110.82  Prover 5: stopped
% 175.86/111.02  Prover 6: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 176.09/111.26  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 181.35/114.67  Prover 6: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 181.79/114.80  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 208.70/131.75  Prover 1: stopped
% 208.91/131.95  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 209.37/132.23  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 209.95/132.45  Prover 7: Proving ...
% 247.41/160.33  Prover 4: stopped
% 247.62/160.53  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 248.31/160.80  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 249.71/161.18  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 270.39/175.89  Prover 8: proved (15354ms)
% 270.39/175.89  Prover 6: stopped
% 270.39/175.89  Prover 7: stopped
% 270.39/175.89  
% 270.39/175.89  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 270.39/175.89  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 270.39/175.89  
% 270.39/175.89  Generating proof ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------