TSTP Solution File: SWB079+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SWB079+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:02:14 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.55s 47.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  199 (  20 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   53 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  268 ( 107   ~; 114   |;  38   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   23 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   16 (  16 usr;  13 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   67 (   8 sgn  34   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_enum_class_001,axiom,
    ! [X11,X12,X21] :
      ( ( iext(uri_rdf_first,X12,X21)
        & iext(uri_rdf_rest,X12,uri_rdf_nil) )
     => ( iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X11,X12)
      <=> ( ic(X11)
          & ! [X4] :
              ( icext(X11,X4)
            <=> X4 = X21 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_enum_class_001) ).

fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_rdfsext_subclass_ext,axiom,
    ? [X42,X37,X38] :
      ( iext(uri_owl_oneOf,uri_ex_c2,X42)
      & iext(uri_rdf_first,X42,uri_ex_w)
      & iext(uri_rdf_rest,X42,X37)
      & iext(uri_owl_oneOf,uri_ex_c1,X38)
      & iext(uri_rdf_first,X38,uri_ex_w)
      & iext(uri_rdf_rest,X38,uri_rdf_nil)
      & iext(uri_rdf_first,X37,uri_ex_u)
      & iext(uri_rdf_rest,X37,uri_rdf_nil) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',premise_rdfbased_sem_rdfsext_subclass_ext) ).

fof(owl_enum_class_002,axiom,
    ! [X11,X12,X21,X14,X22] :
      ( ( iext(uri_rdf_first,X12,X21)
        & iext(uri_rdf_rest,X12,X14)
        & iext(uri_rdf_first,X14,X22)
        & iext(uri_rdf_rest,X14,uri_rdf_nil) )
     => ( iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X11,X12)
      <=> ( ic(X11)
          & ! [X4] :
              ( icext(X11,X4)
            <=> ( X4 = X21
                | X4 = X22 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_enum_class_002) ).

fof(owl_prop_oneof_ext,axiom,
    ! [X4,X7] :
      ( iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X4,X7)
     => ( ic(X4)
        & icext(uri_rdf_List,X7) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_prop_oneof_ext) ).

fof(owl_rdfsext_subclassof,axiom,
    ! [X13,X15] :
      ( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X13,X15)
    <=> ( ic(X13)
        & ic(X15)
        & ! [X4] :
            ( icext(X13,X4)
           => icext(X15,X4) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_rdfsext_subclassof) ).

fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_rdfsext_subclass_ext,conjecture,
    iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c1,uri_ex_c2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_rdfsext_subclass_ext) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X22,X23,X24,X25,X25] :
      ( ( ic(X22)
        | ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X22,X23)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X23,X24)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X23,uri_rdf_nil) )
      & ( ~ icext(X22,X25)
        | X25 = X24
        | ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X22,X23)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X23,X24)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X23,uri_rdf_nil) )
      & ( X25 != X24
        | icext(X22,X25)
        | ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X22,X23)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X23,X24)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X23,uri_rdf_nil) )
      & ( ~ icext(X22,esk12_3(X22,X23,X24))
        | esk12_3(X22,X23,X24) != X24
        | ~ ic(X22)
        | iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X22,X23)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X23,X24)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X23,uri_rdf_nil) )
      & ( icext(X22,esk12_3(X22,X23,X24))
        | esk12_3(X22,X23,X24) = X24
        | ~ ic(X22)
        | iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X22,X23)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X23,X24)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X23,uri_rdf_nil) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_enum_class_001])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ( iext(uri_owl_oneOf,uri_ex_c2,esk1_0)
    & iext(uri_rdf_first,esk1_0,uri_ex_w)
    & iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & iext(uri_owl_oneOf,uri_ex_c1,esk3_0)
    & iext(uri_rdf_first,esk3_0,uri_ex_w)
    & iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk3_0,uri_rdf_nil)
    & iext(uri_rdf_first,esk2_0,uri_ex_u)
    & iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk2_0,uri_rdf_nil) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_rdfsext_subclass_ext])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X23,X24,X25,X26,X27,X28,X28] :
      ( ( ic(X23)
        | ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X23,X24)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X24,X25)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X24,X26)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X26,X27)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X26,uri_rdf_nil) )
      & ( ~ icext(X23,X28)
        | X28 = X25
        | X28 = X27
        | ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X23,X24)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X24,X25)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X24,X26)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X26,X27)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X26,uri_rdf_nil) )
      & ( X28 != X25
        | icext(X23,X28)
        | ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X23,X24)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X24,X25)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X24,X26)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X26,X27)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X26,uri_rdf_nil) )
      & ( X28 != X27
        | icext(X23,X28)
        | ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X23,X24)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X24,X25)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X24,X26)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X26,X27)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X26,uri_rdf_nil) )
      & ( esk13_5(X23,X24,X25,X26,X27) != X25
        | ~ icext(X23,esk13_5(X23,X24,X25,X26,X27))
        | ~ ic(X23)
        | iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X23,X24)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X24,X25)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X24,X26)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X26,X27)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X26,uri_rdf_nil) )
      & ( esk13_5(X23,X24,X25,X26,X27) != X27
        | ~ icext(X23,esk13_5(X23,X24,X25,X26,X27))
        | ~ ic(X23)
        | iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X23,X24)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X24,X25)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X24,X26)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X26,X27)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X26,uri_rdf_nil) )
      & ( icext(X23,esk13_5(X23,X24,X25,X26,X27))
        | esk13_5(X23,X24,X25,X26,X27) = X25
        | esk13_5(X23,X24,X25,X26,X27) = X27
        | ~ ic(X23)
        | iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X23,X24)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X24,X25)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X24,X26)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X26,X27)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X26,uri_rdf_nil) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_enum_class_002])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( X4 = X2
    | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X1,uri_rdf_nil)
    | ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X1,X2)
    | ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X3,X1)
    | ~ icext(X3,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    iext(uri_rdf_first,esk3_0,uri_ex_w),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk3_0,uri_rdf_nil),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X8,X9] :
      ( ( ic(X8)
        | ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X8,X9) )
      & ( icext(uri_rdf_List,X9)
        | ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X8,X9) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_prop_oneof_ext])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( icext(X5,X6)
    | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X1,uri_rdf_nil)
    | ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X1,X2)
    | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X3,X1)
    | ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X3,X4)
    | ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X5,X3)
    | X6 != X4 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( uri_ex_w = X1
    | ~ icext(X2,X1)
    | ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X2,esk3_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    iext(uri_owl_oneOf,uri_ex_c1,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X16,X17,X18,X16,X17] :
      ( ( ic(X16)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X16,X17) )
      & ( ic(X17)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X16,X17) )
      & ( ~ icext(X16,X18)
        | icext(X17,X18)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X16,X17) )
      & ( icext(X16,esk4_2(X16,X17))
        | ~ ic(X16)
        | ~ ic(X17)
        | iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X16,X17) )
      & ( ~ icext(X17,esk4_2(X16,X17))
        | ~ ic(X16)
        | ~ ic(X17)
        | iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X16,X17) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_rdfsext_subclassof])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ic(X1)
    | ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( icext(X1,X2)
    | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X3,uri_rdf_nil)
    | ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X4,X2)
    | ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X3,X5)
    | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X4,X3)
    | ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X1,X4) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    iext(uri_rdf_first,esk1_0,uri_ex_w),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( uri_ex_w = X1
    | ~ icext(uri_ex_c1,X1) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X1,X2)
    | icext(X1,esk4_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ ic(X2)
    | ~ ic(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ic(uri_ex_c1),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( icext(X1,uri_ex_w)
    | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X2,uri_rdf_nil)
    | ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk1_0,X2)
    | ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X1,esk1_0)
    | ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X2,X3) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    iext(uri_rdf_first,esk2_0,uri_ex_u),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk2_0,uri_rdf_nil),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c1,uri_ex_c2),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_rdfsext_subclass_ext]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X1,X2)
    | ~ ic(X2)
    | ~ ic(X1)
    | ~ icext(X2,esk4_2(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( esk4_2(uri_ex_c1,X1) = uri_ex_w
    | iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c1,X1)
    | ~ ic(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( icext(X1,uri_ex_w)
    | ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X1,esk1_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    iext(uri_owl_oneOf,uri_ex_c2,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c1,uri_ex_c2),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c1,X1)
    | ~ ic(X1)
    | ~ icext(X1,uri_ex_w) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    icext(uri_ex_c2,uri_ex_w),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ic(uri_ex_c2),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c1,uri_ex_c2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35])]),c_0_36]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWB079+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun  1 04:34:56 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.39/23.44  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.39/23.46  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.39/23.53  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.39/23.54  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.55/46.54  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.55/46.55  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.55/46.57  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.55/46.60  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.55/47.72  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.55/47.72  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.55/47.72  # Preprocessing time       : 0.029 s
% 0.55/47.72  
% 0.55/47.72  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.55/47.72  # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.55/47.72  # Parsed axioms                        : 560
% 0.55/47.72  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 513
% 0.55/47.72  # Initial clauses                      : 72
% 0.55/47.72  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 12
% 0.55/47.72  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 60
% 0.55/47.72  # Processed clauses                    : 681
% 0.55/47.72  # ...of these trivial                  : 24
% 0.55/47.72  # ...subsumed                          : 346
% 0.55/47.72  # ...remaining for further processing  : 311
% 0.55/47.72  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Generated clauses                    : 1057
% 0.55/47.72  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 621
% 0.55/47.72  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 72
% 0.55/47.72  # Paramodulations                      : 1057
% 0.55/47.72  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Current number of processed clauses  : 311
% 0.55/47.72  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 63
% 0.55/47.72  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.72  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.55/47.72  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 247
% 0.55/47.72  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.72  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.55/47.72  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 20881
% 0.55/47.72  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11102
% 0.55/47.72  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 418
% 0.55/47.72  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22
% 0.55/47.72  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 15
% 0.55/47.72  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 23619
% 0.55/47.72  
% 0.55/47.72  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/47.72  # User time                : 0.074 s
% 0.55/47.72  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.55/47.72  # Total time               : 0.078 s
% 0.55/47.72  # Maximum resident set size: 4792 pages
% 0.55/47.72  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.55/47.72  
% 0.55/47.72  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.55/47.72  # OLD status Res
% 0.55/47.72  # Preprocessing time       : 0.091 s
% 0.55/47.72  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_eb48853eb71ccd2a6fdade56c25b63f5692e1a0c for 23 seconds:
% 0.55/47.72  
% 0.55/47.72  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.55/47.72  # OLD status Res
% 0.55/47.72  # Preprocessing time       : 0.044 s
% 0.55/47.72  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_761a0d093d9701c0eed884aebb46468e8d439c31 for 23 seconds:
% 0.55/47.72  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.2,,,100,1.0)
% 0.55/47.72  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 0.55/47.72  
% 0.55/47.72  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.55/47.72  # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.55/47.72  # Parsed axioms                        : 560
% 0.55/47.72  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 524
% 0.55/47.72  # Initial clauses                      : 58
% 0.55/47.72  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 12
% 0.55/47.72  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 46
% 0.55/47.72  # Processed clauses                    : 363
% 0.55/47.72  # ...of these trivial                  : 16
% 0.55/47.72  # ...subsumed                          : 158
% 0.55/47.72  # ...remaining for further processing  : 189
% 0.55/47.72  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Generated clauses                    : 554
% 0.55/47.72  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 317
% 0.55/47.72  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 44
% 0.55/47.72  # Paramodulations                      : 554
% 0.55/47.72  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Current number of processed clauses  : 189
% 0.55/47.72  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 44
% 0.55/47.72  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.72  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.55/47.72  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 144
% 0.55/47.72  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.72  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.55/47.72  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4390
% 0.55/47.72  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1857
% 0.55/47.72  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 202
% 0.55/47.72  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 107
% 0.55/47.72  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 14
% 0.55/47.72  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 17071
% 0.55/47.72  
% 0.55/47.72  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/47.72  # User time                : 0.022 s
% 0.55/47.72  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.55/47.72  # Total time               : 0.026 s
% 0.55/47.72  # Maximum resident set size: 4516 pages
% 0.55/47.72  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_bb5e3cecdbc7660bd3a6f864cadb7769d8aea26a for 23 seconds:
% 0.55/47.72  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,,500,1.0)
% 0.55/47.72  # Preprocessing time       : 0.027 s
% 0.55/47.72  
% 0.55/47.72  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.55/47.72  # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.55/47.72  # Parsed axioms                        : 560
% 0.55/47.72  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 540
% 0.55/47.72  # Initial clauses                      : 31
% 0.55/47.72  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 12
% 0.55/47.72  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 19
% 0.55/47.72  # Processed clauses                    : 25
% 0.55/47.72  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.55/47.72  # ...subsumed                          : 5
% 0.55/47.72  # ...remaining for further processing  : 18
% 0.55/47.72  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Generated clauses                    : 12
% 0.55/47.72  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 6
% 0.55/47.72  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Paramodulations                      : 12
% 0.55/47.72  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Current number of processed clauses  : 18
% 0.55/47.72  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6
% 0.55/47.72  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.72  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.55/47.72  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 11
% 0.55/47.72  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.72  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.55/47.72  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 13
% 0.55/47.72  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.55/47.72  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 5
% 0.55/47.72  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.55/47.72  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 8411
% 0.55/47.72  
% 0.55/47.72  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/47.72  # User time                : 0.026 s
% 0.55/47.72  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.55/47.72  # Total time               : 0.028 s
% 0.55/47.72  # Maximum resident set size: 3668 pages
% 0.55/47.72  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_e252f7803940d118fa0ef69fc2319cb55aee23b9 for 23 seconds:
% 0.55/47.72  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.4,,03,100,1.0)
% 0.55/47.72  # Preprocessing time       : 0.016 s
% 0.55/47.72  
% 0.55/47.72  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.55/47.72  # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.55/47.72  # Parsed axioms                        : 560
% 0.55/47.72  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 514
% 0.55/47.72  # Initial clauses                      : 71
% 0.55/47.72  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 12
% 0.55/47.72  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 59
% 0.55/47.72  # Processed clauses                    : 596
% 0.55/47.72  # ...of these trivial                  : 67
% 0.55/47.72  # ...subsumed                          : 266
% 0.55/47.72  # ...remaining for further processing  : 263
% 0.55/47.72  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Backward-subsumed                    : 6
% 0.55/47.72  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Generated clauses                    : 947
% 0.55/47.72  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 538
% 0.55/47.72  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Paramodulations                      : 947
% 0.55/47.72  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Current number of processed clauses  : 257
% 0.55/47.72  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 63
% 0.55/47.72  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.72  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.55/47.72  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 193
% 0.55/47.72  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.72  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Current number of archived clauses   : 7
% 0.55/47.72  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1892
% 0.55/47.72  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1200
% 0.55/47.72  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 272
% 0.55/47.72  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27
% 0.55/47.72  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 15
% 0.55/47.72  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 21777
% 0.55/47.72  
% 0.55/47.72  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/47.72  # User time                : 0.024 s
% 0.55/47.72  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.55/47.72  # Total time               : 0.027 s
% 0.55/47.72  # Maximum resident set size: 4792 pages
% 0.55/47.72  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_b1d72019af42f5b571a6c0b233a5b6d1de064075 for 23 seconds:
% 0.55/47.72  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,500,1.0)
% 0.55/47.72  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 0.55/47.72  
% 0.55/47.72  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.55/47.72  # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.55/47.72  # Parsed axioms                        : 560
% 0.55/47.72  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 529
% 0.55/47.72  # Initial clauses                      : 51
% 0.55/47.72  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 51
% 0.55/47.72  # Processed clauses                    : 526
% 0.55/47.72  # ...of these trivial                  : 24
% 0.55/47.72  # ...subsumed                          : 252
% 0.55/47.72  # ...remaining for further processing  : 250
% 0.55/47.72  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Generated clauses                    : 648
% 0.55/47.72  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 475
% 0.55/47.72  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 102
% 0.55/47.72  # Paramodulations                      : 648
% 0.55/47.72  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Current number of processed clauses  : 250
% 0.55/47.72  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 53
% 0.55/47.72  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.72  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.55/47.72  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 196
% 0.55/47.72  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.72  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 11004
% 0.55/47.72  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3462
% 0.55/47.72  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 354
% 0.55/47.72  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 150
% 0.55/47.72  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 17
% 0.55/47.72  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 18778
% 0.55/47.72  
% 0.55/47.72  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/47.72  # User time                : 0.028 s
% 0.55/47.72  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.55/47.72  # Total time               : 0.032 s
% 0.55/47.72  # Maximum resident set size: 4496 pages
% 0.55/47.72  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_e96ef4641ae500918cdd95fcfce21e29f2ac5eec for 23 seconds:
% 0.55/47.72  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,6.0,,03,100,1.0)
% 0.55/47.72  # Preprocessing time       : 0.021 s
% 0.55/47.72  
% 0.55/47.72  # Proof found!
% 0.55/47.72  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.55/47.72  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.55/47.72  # Proof object total steps             : 38
% 0.55/47.72  # Proof object clause steps            : 25
% 0.55/47.72  # Proof object formula steps           : 13
% 0.55/47.72  # Proof object conjectures             : 4
% 0.55/47.72  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 1
% 0.55/47.72  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.55/47.72  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 14
% 0.55/47.72  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 6
% 0.55/47.72  # Proof object generating inferences   : 10
% 0.55/47.72  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 13
% 0.55/47.72  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.55/47.72  # Parsed axioms                        : 560
% 0.55/47.72  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 459
% 0.55/47.72  # Initial clauses                      : 213
% 0.55/47.72  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 20
% 0.55/47.72  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 193
% 0.55/47.72  # Processed clauses                    : 1153
% 0.55/47.72  # ...of these trivial                  : 78
% 0.55/47.72  # ...subsumed                          : 388
% 0.55/47.72  # ...remaining for further processing  : 687
% 0.55/47.72  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 10
% 0.55/47.72  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Backward-subsumed                    : 21
% 0.55/47.72  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.55/47.72  # Generated clauses                    : 2083
% 0.55/47.72  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 1485
% 0.55/47.72  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 172
% 0.55/47.72  # Paramodulations                      : 2073
% 0.55/47.72  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Equation resolutions                 : 10
% 0.55/47.72  # Current number of processed clauses  : 654
% 0.55/47.72  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 179
% 0.55/47.72  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.55/47.72  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.55/47.72  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 472
% 0.55/47.72  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 496
% 0.55/47.72  # ...number of literals in the above   : 3794
% 0.55/47.72  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Current number of archived clauses   : 24
% 0.55/47.72  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 71921
% 0.55/47.72  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 32737
% 0.55/47.72  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 580
% 0.55/47.72  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3725
% 0.55/47.72  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 34
% 0.55/47.72  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.55/47.72  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.55/47.72  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 39318
% 0.55/47.72  
% 0.55/47.72  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/47.72  # User time                : 0.066 s
% 0.55/47.72  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.55/47.72  # Total time               : 0.071 s
% 0.55/47.72  # Maximum resident set size: 6100 pages
% 0.55/69.56  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.55/69.57  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.55/69.58  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.55/69.58  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.58  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.55/69.58  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.59  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.55/69.59  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.59  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.59  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.59  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.55/69.59  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.60  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.55/69.60  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.60  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.60  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.60  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.55/69.60  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.60  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.60  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.61  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.55/69.61  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.61  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.61  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.61  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.61  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.61  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.55/69.61  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.62  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.62  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.62  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.62  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.62  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.62  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.69  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.55/69.70  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.70  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.70  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.70  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.55/69.71  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/69.71  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------