TSTP Solution File: SWB077+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWB077+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:38:44 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 82.44s 11.14s
% Output : CNFRefutation 82.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 74 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 83 ( 32 ~; 36 |; 11 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 41 ( 3 sgn; 18 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(rdfs_subpropertyof_main,axiom,
! [X2,X9] :
( iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X2,X9)
=> ( ip(X2)
& ip(X9)
& ! [X4,X7] :
( iext(X2,X4,X7)
=> iext(X9,X4,X7) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lqTUFNzSW5/E---3.1_28522.p',rdfs_subpropertyof_main) ).
fof(owl_rdfsext_range,axiom,
! [X2,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdfs_range,X2,X5)
<=> ( ip(X2)
& ip(X5)
& ! [X4,X7] :
( iext(X2,X4,X7)
=> icext(X5,X7) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lqTUFNzSW5/E---3.1_28522.p',owl_rdfsext_range) ).
fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_rdfsext_range_subprop,axiom,
( iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p2,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_ex_p1,uri_ex_p2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lqTUFNzSW5/E---3.1_28522.p',premise_rdfbased_sem_rdfsext_range_subprop) ).
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_rdfsext_range_subprop,conjecture,
iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p1,uri_ex_c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lqTUFNzSW5/E---3.1_28522.p',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_rdfsext_range_subprop) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X74,X75,X76,X77] :
( ( ip(X74)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X74,X75) )
& ( ip(X75)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X74,X75) )
& ( ~ iext(X74,X76,X77)
| iext(X75,X76,X77)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X74,X75) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_subpropertyof_main])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X49,X50,X51,X52,X53,X54] :
( ( ip(X49)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_range,X49,X50) )
& ( ip(X50)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_range,X49,X50) )
& ( ~ iext(X49,X51,X52)
| icext(X50,X52)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_range,X49,X50) )
& ( iext(X53,esk1_2(X53,X54),esk2_2(X53,X54))
| ~ ip(X53)
| ~ ip(X54)
| iext(uri_rdfs_range,X53,X54) )
& ( ~ icext(X54,esk2_2(X53,X54))
| ~ ip(X53)
| ~ ip(X54)
| iext(uri_rdfs_range,X53,X54) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_rdfsext_range])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( iext(X4,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X1,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( iext(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2))
| iext(uri_rdfs_range,X1,X2)
| ~ ip(X1)
| ~ ip(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ip(X1)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( iext(X1,esk1_2(X2,X3),esk2_2(X2,X3))
| iext(uri_rdfs_range,X2,X3)
| ~ ip(X3)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X2,X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_ex_p1,uri_ex_p2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_rdfsext_range_subprop]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( icext(X4,X3)
| ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_range,X1,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( iext(uri_ex_p2,esk1_2(uri_ex_p1,X1),esk2_2(uri_ex_p1,X1))
| iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p1,X1)
| ~ ip(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( icext(X1,esk2_2(uri_ex_p1,X2))
| iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p1,X2)
| ~ ip(X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p2,uri_ex_c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_rdfsext_range_subprop]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ip(X1)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_range,X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p1,uri_ex_c),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_rdfsext_range_subprop])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( iext(uri_rdfs_range,X2,X1)
| ~ icext(X1,esk2_2(X2,X1))
| ~ ip(X2)
| ~ ip(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( icext(uri_ex_c,esk2_2(uri_ex_p1,X1))
| iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p1,X1)
| ~ ip(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
ip(uri_ex_p1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
ip(uri_ex_c),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p1,uri_ex_c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),c_0_21]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWB077+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 20:13:20 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.53 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lqTUFNzSW5/E---3.1_28522.p
% 82.44/11.14 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 82.44/11.14 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 82.44/11.14 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 82.44/11.14 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 82.44/11.14 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 82.44/11.14 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 82.44/11.14 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 82.44/11.14 # sh5l with pid 28602 completed with status 0
% 82.44/11.14 # Result found by sh5l
% 82.44/11.14 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 82.44/11.14 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 82.44/11.14 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 82.44/11.14 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 82.44/11.14 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 82.44/11.14 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 82.44/11.14 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 82.44/11.14 # Search class: FGHSF-FMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 82.44/11.14 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 82.44/11.14 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 181s (1) cores
% 82.44/11.14 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with pid 28611 completed with status 0
% 82.44/11.14 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 82.44/11.14 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 82.44/11.14 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 82.44/11.14 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 82.44/11.14 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 82.44/11.14 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 82.44/11.14 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 82.44/11.14 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 82.44/11.14 # Search class: FGHSF-FMLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 82.44/11.14 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 82.44/11.14 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 181s (1) cores
% 82.44/11.14 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 82.44/11.14 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 82.44/11.14
% 82.44/11.14 # Proof found!
% 82.44/11.14 # SZS status Theorem
% 82.44/11.14 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 82.44/11.14 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 82.44/11.14 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 235
% 82.44/11.14 # Initial clauses : 925
% 82.44/11.14 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 40
% 82.44/11.14 # Initial clauses in saturation : 885
% 82.44/11.14 # Processed clauses : 25954
% 82.44/11.14 # ...of these trivial : 202
% 82.44/11.14 # ...subsumed : 11051
% 82.44/11.14 # ...remaining for further processing : 14701
% 82.44/11.14 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 14
% 82.44/11.14 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 82.44/11.14 # Backward-subsumed : 207
% 82.44/11.14 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 82.44/11.14 # Generated clauses : 134754
% 82.44/11.14 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 129937
% 82.44/11.14 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 82.44/11.14 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 106
% 82.44/11.14 # Paramodulations : 134728
% 82.44/11.14 # Factorizations : 12
% 82.44/11.14 # NegExts : 0
% 82.44/11.14 # Equation resolutions : 14
% 82.44/11.14 # Total rewrite steps : 10233
% 82.44/11.14 # Propositional unsat checks : 2
% 82.44/11.14 # Propositional check models : 0
% 82.44/11.14 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 82.44/11.14 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 82.44/11.14 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 82.44/11.14 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 82.44/11.14 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 82.44/11.14 # Propositional encoding time : 0.161
% 82.44/11.14 # Propositional solver time : 0.144
% 82.44/11.14 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 82.44/11.14 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 82.44/11.14 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 82.44/11.14 # Current number of processed clauses : 13669
% 82.44/11.14 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 625
% 82.44/11.14 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 82.44/11.14 # Negative unit clauses : 31
% 82.44/11.14 # Non-unit-clauses : 13013
% 82.44/11.14 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 105477
% 82.44/11.14 # ...number of literals in the above : 774472
% 82.44/11.14 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 82.44/11.14 # Current number of archived clauses : 1018
% 82.44/11.14 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 47242333
% 82.44/11.14 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18829602
% 82.44/11.14 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 10599
% 82.44/11.14 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 42461
% 82.44/11.14 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 82.44/11.14 # BW rewrite match attempts : 212
% 82.44/11.14 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 82.44/11.14 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 82.44/11.14 # Condensation successes : 0
% 82.44/11.14 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4301300
% 82.44/11.14
% 82.44/11.14 # -------------------------------------------------
% 82.44/11.14 # User time : 10.094 s
% 82.44/11.14 # System time : 0.138 s
% 82.44/11.14 # Total time : 10.232 s
% 82.44/11.14 # Maximum resident set size: 5220 pages
% 82.44/11.14
% 82.44/11.14 # -------------------------------------------------
% 82.44/11.14 # User time : 10.106 s
% 82.44/11.14 # System time : 0.141 s
% 82.44/11.14 # Total time : 10.247 s
% 82.44/11.14 # Maximum resident set size: 2232 pages
% 82.44/11.14 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------