TSTP Solution File: SWB074+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWB074+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:02:13 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.26s 1.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 37 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 32 ( 14 ~; 11 |; 5 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 7 sgn 11 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_prop_topdataproperty_ext,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X4,X7)
<=> ( ir(X4)
& lv(X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_prop_topdataproperty_ext) ).
fof(simple_ir,axiom,
! [X4] : ir(X4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',simple_ir) ).
fof(owl_parts_lv_def,axiom,
! [X4] :
( lv(X4)
<=> iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,uri_rdfs_Literal) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_parts_lv_def) ).
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_ext_lo,conjecture,
iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_ext_lo) ).
fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_ext_lo,axiom,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_y,uri_rdfs_Literal)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_x,uri_owl_Thing) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',premise_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_ext_lo) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X8,X9,X8,X9] :
( ( ir(X8)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X8,X9) )
& ( lv(X9)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X8,X9) )
& ( ~ ir(X8)
| ~ lv(X9)
| iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X8,X9) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_prop_topdataproperty_ext])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X5] : ir(X5),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[simple_ir]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X1,X2)
| ~ lv(X2)
| ~ ir(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
ir(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X5,X5] :
( ( ~ lv(X5)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X5,uri_rdfs_Literal) )
& ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X5,uri_rdfs_Literal)
| lv(X5) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_parts_lv_def])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_ext_lo]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X1,X2)
| ~ lv(X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( lv(X1)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_rdfs_Literal) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,uri_rdfs_Literal) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_y,uri_rdfs_Literal),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_ext_lo]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X1,uri_ex_y),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWB074+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 04:51:26 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.26/1.44 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.26/1.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.26/1.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.030 s
% 0.26/1.44
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof found!
% 0.26/1.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/1.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object total steps : 19
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object formula steps : 10
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 0.26/1.44 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.26/1.44 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.26/1.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 459
% 0.26/1.44 # Initial clauses : 131
% 0.26/1.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 15
% 0.26/1.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 116
% 0.26/1.44 # Processed clauses : 124
% 0.26/1.44 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.26/1.44 # ...subsumed : 9
% 0.26/1.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 113
% 0.26/1.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.26/1.44 # Generated clauses : 207
% 0.26/1.44 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 175
% 0.26/1.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Paramodulations : 207
% 0.26/1.44 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 112
% 0.26/1.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 34
% 0.26/1.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 78
% 0.26/1.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 167
% 0.26/1.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 430
% 0.26/1.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.26/1.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 953
% 0.26/1.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 888
% 0.26/1.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 9
% 0.26/1.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.26/1.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 9
% 0.26/1.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.26/1.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 14201
% 0.26/1.44
% 0.26/1.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/1.44 # User time : 0.034 s
% 0.26/1.44 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.26/1.44 # Total time : 0.035 s
% 0.26/1.44 # Maximum resident set size: 4324 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------