TSTP Solution File: SWB074+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWB074+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:38:44 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.36s 0.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.36s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 49 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 43 ( 18 ~; 16 |; 5 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 3 sgn; 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_parts_idc_cond_inst,axiom,
! [X4] :
( idc(X4)
=> ! [X7] :
( icext(X4,X7)
=> lv(X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7T0Hxvs4FE/E---3.1_15648.p',owl_parts_idc_cond_inst) ).
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
<=> icext(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7T0Hxvs4FE/E---3.1_15648.p',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(owl_prop_topdataproperty_ext,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X4,X7)
<=> ( ir(X4)
& lv(X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7T0Hxvs4FE/E---3.1_15648.p',owl_prop_topdataproperty_ext) ).
fof(simple_ir,axiom,
! [X4] : ir(X4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7T0Hxvs4FE/E---3.1_15648.p',simple_ir) ).
fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_ext_lo,axiom,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_y,uri_rdfs_Literal)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_x,uri_owl_Thing) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7T0Hxvs4FE/E---3.1_15648.p',premise_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_ext_lo) ).
fof(owl_class_literal_type,axiom,
idc(uri_rdfs_Literal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7T0Hxvs4FE/E---3.1_15648.p',owl_class_literal_type) ).
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_ext_lo,conjecture,
iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7T0Hxvs4FE/E---3.1_15648.p',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_ext_lo) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X55,X56] :
( ~ idc(X55)
| ~ icext(X55,X56)
| lv(X56) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_parts_idc_cond_inst])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X46,X47] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X46,X47)
| icext(X47,X46) )
& ( ~ icext(X47,X46)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X46,X47) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X42,X43] :
( ( ir(X42)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X42,X43) )
& ( lv(X43)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X42,X43) )
& ( ~ ir(X42)
| ~ lv(X43)
| iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X42,X43) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_prop_topdataproperty_ext])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X58] : ir(X58),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[simple_ir]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( lv(X2)
| ~ idc(X1)
| ~ icext(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( icext(X2,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X1,X2)
| ~ ir(X1)
| ~ lv(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
ir(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( lv(X1)
| ~ idc(X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_y,uri_rdfs_Literal),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_ext_lo]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
idc(uri_rdfs_Literal),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[owl_class_literal_type]) ).
fof(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_prop_topdataproperty_ext_lo])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X1,X2)
| ~ lv(X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
lv(uri_ex_y),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
iext(uri_owl_topDataProperty,X1,uri_ex_y),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWB074+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 19:50:56 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.52 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7T0Hxvs4FE/E---3.1_15648.p
% 0.36/0.56 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.36/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.56 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.36/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.36/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.36/0.56 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.56 # new_bool_1 with pid 15793 completed with status 0
% 0.36/0.56 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.36/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.56 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.36/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.36/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.36/0.56 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.36/0.56 # Search class: FGHNF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.36/0.56 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.36/0.56 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.56 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 61s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.56 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 15799 completed with status 0
% 0.36/0.56 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.36/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.56 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.36/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.36/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.36/0.56 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.36/0.56 # Search class: FGHNF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.36/0.56 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.36/0.56 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.56 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.36/0.56 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.36/0.56
% 0.36/0.56 # Proof found!
% 0.36/0.56 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.36/0.56 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.36/0.56 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.36/0.56 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 492
% 0.36/0.56 # Initial clauses : 96
% 0.36/0.56 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.36/0.56 # Initial clauses in saturation : 96
% 0.36/0.56 # Processed clauses : 375
% 0.36/0.56 # ...of these trivial : 36
% 0.36/0.56 # ...subsumed : 48
% 0.36/0.56 # ...remaining for further processing : 291
% 0.36/0.56 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.36/0.56 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.36/0.56 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.36/0.56 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.36/0.56 # Generated clauses : 452
% 0.36/0.56 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 325
% 0.36/0.56 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.36/0.56 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.36/0.56 # Paramodulations : 452
% 0.36/0.56 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.36/0.56 # NegExts : 0
% 0.36/0.56 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.36/0.56 # Total rewrite steps : 182
% 0.36/0.56 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.36/0.56 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.36/0.56 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.36/0.56 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.36/0.56 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.36/0.56 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.36/0.56 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.56 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.56 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.56 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.56 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.56 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.56 # Current number of processed clauses : 216
% 0.36/0.56 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 71
% 0.36/0.56 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.36/0.56 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.36/0.56 # Non-unit-clauses : 145
% 0.36/0.56 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 118
% 0.36/0.56 # ...number of literals in the above : 256
% 0.36/0.56 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.36/0.56 # Current number of archived clauses : 75
% 0.36/0.56 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1765
% 0.36/0.56 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1310
% 0.36/0.56 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 48
% 0.36/0.56 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 85
% 0.36/0.56 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.36/0.56 # BW rewrite match attempts : 87
% 0.36/0.56 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.36/0.56 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.36/0.56 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.36/0.56 # Termbank termtop insertions : 15043
% 0.36/0.56
% 0.36/0.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/0.56 # User time : 0.021 s
% 0.36/0.56 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.36/0.56 # Total time : 0.025 s
% 0.36/0.56 # Maximum resident set size: 2656 pages
% 0.36/0.56
% 0.36/0.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/0.56 # User time : 0.049 s
% 0.36/0.56 # System time : 0.012 s
% 0.36/0.56 # Total time : 0.060 s
% 0.36/0.56 # Maximum resident set size: 2228 pages
% 0.36/0.56 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------