TSTP Solution File: SWB065+1 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : SWB065+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 18:59:48 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 259.10s 173.30s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWB065+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun  1 10:16:55 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.50/0.57          ____       _                          
% 0.50/0.57    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.50/0.57   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.50/0.57  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.50/0.57  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.50/0.57  
% 0.50/0.57  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.50/0.58  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.50/0.58  
% 0.50/0.58  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.50/0.58  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.50/0.58  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.50/0.58  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.50/0.58  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.50/0.58  
% 0.50/0.58  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.50/0.58  
% 0.50/0.58  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.50/0.62  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 3.43/1.33  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 7.38/2.25  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.01/2.32  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 19.98/5.94  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 21.34/6.29  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 24.85/7.07  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 31.22/8.53  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 32.08/8.83  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 45.54/12.61  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 46.36/12.80  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 57.61/17.88  Prover 0: stopped
% 57.79/18.08  Prover 3: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 58.31/18.35  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 58.81/18.52  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 59.04/18.55  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 100.56/57.35  Prover 3: stopped
% 100.85/57.55  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete
% 101.52/57.85  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 107.84/60.75  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 108.10/60.88  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 157.05/102.79  Prover 2: stopped
% 157.33/102.99  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 157.87/103.29  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 161.89/105.34  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 169.73/111.95  Prover 5: stopped
% 169.89/112.15  Prover 6: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 170.28/112.39  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 174.87/115.38  Prover 6: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 175.51/115.53  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 195.02/131.84  Prover 1: stopped
% 195.22/132.04  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 195.82/132.33  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 196.49/132.57  Prover 7: Proving ...
% 245.50/165.46  Prover 4: stopped
% 245.67/165.66  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 246.46/165.93  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 248.41/166.44  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 259.10/173.30  Prover 8: proved (7638ms)
% 259.10/173.30  Prover 6: stopped
% 259.10/173.30  Prover 7: stopped
% 259.10/173.30  
% 259.10/173.30  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 259.10/173.30  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 259.10/173.30  
% 259.10/173.30  Generating proof ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------