TSTP Solution File: SWB065+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWB065+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:02:12 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 1.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 84 ( 15 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 26 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 98 ( 40 ~; 39 |; 14 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 10 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 40 ( 5 sgn 21 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_enum_class_001,axiom,
! [X11,X12,X21] :
( ( iext(uri_rdf_first,X12,X21)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,X12,uri_rdf_nil) )
=> ( iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X11,X12)
<=> ( ic(X11)
& ! [X4] :
( icext(X11,X4)
<=> X4 = X21 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_enum_class_001) ).
fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_sameas_ext,axiom,
? [X42,X37] :
( iext(uri_rdf_first,X42,uri_ex_u)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,X42,uri_rdf_nil)
& iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X37,X42)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,X37) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',premise_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_sameas_ext) ).
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
<=> icext(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_sameas_ext,conjecture,
iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_sameas_ext) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_sameas,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X4,X7)
<=> X4 = X7 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_eqdis_sameas) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X22,X23,X24,X25,X25] :
( ( ic(X22)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X22,X23)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X23,X24)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X23,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( ~ icext(X22,X25)
| X25 = X24
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X22,X23)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X23,X24)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X23,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( X25 != X24
| icext(X22,X25)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X22,X23)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X23,X24)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X23,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( ~ icext(X22,esk4_3(X22,X23,X24))
| esk4_3(X22,X23,X24) != X24
| ~ ic(X22)
| iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X22,X23)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X23,X24)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X23,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( icext(X22,esk4_3(X22,X23,X24))
| esk4_3(X22,X23,X24) = X24
| ~ ic(X22)
| iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X22,X23)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X23,X24)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X23,uri_rdf_nil) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_enum_class_001])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
( iext(uri_rdf_first,esk1_0,uri_ex_u)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk1_0,uri_rdf_nil)
& iext(uri_owl_oneOf,esk2_0,esk1_0)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,esk2_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_sameas_ext])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( X4 = X2
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X1,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X3,X1)
| ~ icext(X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk1_0,uri_rdf_nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ icext(X3,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,esk1_0,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X3,esk1_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_first,esk1_0,uri_ex_u),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X6,X7,X6,X7] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X6,X7)
| icext(X7,X6) )
& ( ~ icext(X7,X6)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X6,X7) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( uri_ex_u = X1
| ~ icext(X2,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X2,esk1_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( icext(X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_sameas_ext]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( uri_ex_u = X1
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X2,esk1_0)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
iext(uri_owl_oneOf,esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X8,X9,X8,X9] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X8,X9)
| X8 = X9 )
& ( X8 != X9
| iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X8,X9) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_sameas])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( uri_ex_u = X1
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2)
| X1 != X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
uri_ex_u = uri_ex_w,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X1),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SWB065+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 10:07:30 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/1.43 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.033 s
% 0.24/1.43
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object total steps : 26
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object clause steps : 15
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object initial clauses used : 8
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object generating inferences : 5
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 0.24/1.43 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.43 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.24/1.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 500
% 0.24/1.43 # Initial clauses : 109
% 0.24/1.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 15
% 0.24/1.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 94
% 0.24/1.43 # Processed clauses : 327
% 0.24/1.43 # ...of these trivial : 27
% 0.24/1.43 # ...subsumed : 60
% 0.24/1.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 240
% 0.24/1.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 11
% 0.24/1.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.24/1.43 # Backward-rewritten : 32
% 0.24/1.43 # Generated clauses : 562
% 0.24/1.43 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 385
% 0.24/1.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 13
% 0.24/1.43 # Paramodulations : 551
% 0.24/1.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Equation resolutions : 11
% 0.24/1.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 196
% 0.24/1.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 83
% 0.24/1.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.24/1.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 109
% 0.24/1.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 137
% 0.24/1.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 686
% 0.24/1.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 34
% 0.24/1.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4990
% 0.24/1.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1689
% 0.24/1.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 58
% 0.24/1.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 252
% 0.24/1.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 14
% 0.24/1.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.24/1.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 19947
% 0.24/1.43
% 0.24/1.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.43 # User time : 0.049 s
% 0.24/1.43 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.24/1.43 # Total time : 0.052 s
% 0.24/1.43 # Maximum resident set size: 4668 pages
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.52 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------