TSTP Solution File: SWB065+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWB065+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:38:42 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 77 ( 13 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 26 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 89 ( 35 ~; 35 |; 14 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 10 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 32 ( 0 sgn; 17 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_enum_class_001,axiom,
! [X11,X12,X21] :
( ( iext(uri_rdf_first,X12,X21)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,X12,uri_rdf_nil) )
=> ( iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X11,X12)
<=> ( ic(X11)
& ! [X4] :
( icext(X11,X4)
<=> X4 = X21 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yLfbQIQQuR/E---3.1_9492.p',owl_enum_class_001) ).
fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_sameas_ext,axiom,
? [X42,X37] :
( iext(uri_rdf_first,X42,uri_ex_u)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,X42,uri_rdf_nil)
& iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X37,X42)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,X37) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yLfbQIQQuR/E---3.1_9492.p',premise_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_sameas_ext) ).
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
<=> icext(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yLfbQIQQuR/E---3.1_9492.p',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_sameas,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X4,X7)
<=> X4 = X7 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yLfbQIQQuR/E---3.1_9492.p',owl_eqdis_sameas) ).
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_sameas_ext,conjecture,
iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yLfbQIQQuR/E---3.1_9492.p',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_sameas_ext) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X60,X61,X62,X63,X64] :
( ( ic(X60)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X60,X61)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X61,X62)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X61,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( ~ icext(X60,X63)
| X63 = X62
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X60,X61)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X61,X62)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X61,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( X64 != X62
| icext(X60,X64)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X60,X61)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X61,X62)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X61,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( ~ icext(X60,esk4_3(X60,X61,X62))
| esk4_3(X60,X61,X62) != X62
| ~ ic(X60)
| iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X60,X61)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X61,X62)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X61,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( icext(X60,esk4_3(X60,X61,X62))
| esk4_3(X60,X61,X62) = X62
| ~ ic(X60)
| iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X60,X61)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X61,X62)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X61,uri_rdf_nil) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_enum_class_001])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
( iext(uri_rdf_first,esk1_0,uri_ex_u)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk1_0,uri_rdf_nil)
& iext(uri_owl_oneOf,esk2_0,esk1_0)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,esk2_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_sameas_ext])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( X2 = X3
| ~ icext(X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X1,X4)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X4,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X4,uri_rdf_nil) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_first,esk1_0,uri_ex_u),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk1_0,uri_rdf_nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X50,X51] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X50,X51)
| icext(X51,X50) )
& ( ~ icext(X51,X50)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X50,X51) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( X1 = uri_ex_u
| ~ icext(X2,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X2,esk1_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( icext(X2,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X47,X48] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X47,X48)
| X47 = X48 )
& ( X47 != X48
| iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X47,X48) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_sameas])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_eqdis_sameas_ext])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( X1 = uri_ex_u
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X2,esk1_0)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
iext(uri_owl_oneOf,esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2)
| X1 != X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
uri_ex_u = uri_ex_w,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X1),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10 % Problem : SWB065+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.05/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 20:57:36 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.45 Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.yLfbQIQQuR/E---3.1_9492.p
% 0.17/0.49 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.49 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.17/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49 # new_bool_1 with pid 9571 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.17/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.49 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.17/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.49 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.17/0.49 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 361s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49 # Starting U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 61s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49 # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 9574 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 0.17/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.49 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.17/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.49 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.17/0.49 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 361s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.49
% 0.17/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.17/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 508
% 0.17/0.49 # Initial clauses : 93
% 0.17/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 93
% 0.17/0.49 # Processed clauses : 206
% 0.17/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 34
% 0.17/0.49 # ...subsumed : 31
% 0.17/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 141
% 0.17/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 7
% 0.17/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.17/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 13
% 0.17/0.49 # Generated clauses : 260
% 0.17/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 217
% 0.17/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 0.17/0.49 # Paramodulations : 253
% 0.17/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 7
% 0.17/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 116
% 0.17/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 120
% 0.17/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 47
% 0.17/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.17/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 69
% 0.17/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 94
% 0.17/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 423
% 0.17/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 14
% 0.17/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3245
% 0.17/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 527
% 0.17/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 18
% 0.17/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 232
% 0.17/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 10
% 0.17/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.17/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 15438
% 0.17/0.49
% 0.17/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.49 # User time : 0.016 s
% 0.17/0.49 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.49 # Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.17/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 2656 pages
% 0.17/0.49
% 0.17/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.49 # User time : 0.041 s
% 0.17/0.49 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.17/0.49 # Total time : 0.052 s
% 0.17/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 2236 pages
% 0.17/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------