TSTP Solution File: SWB047+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWB047+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 18:59:25 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 10.98s 3.10s
% Output : CNFRefutation 10.98s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 34 ( 9 unt; 8 nHn; 34 RR)
% Number of literals : 77 ( 10 equ; 37 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 6 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 50 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_108,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ icext(uri_owl_FunctionalProperty,X3)
| ~ iext(X3,X4,X2)
| ~ iext(X3,X4,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rkknj5op/lgb.p',i_0_108) ).
cnf(i_0_1088,plain,
( icext(X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rkknj5op/lgb.p',i_0_1088) ).
cnf(i_0_1067,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p1,uri_owl_FunctionalProperty),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rkknj5op/lgb.p',i_0_1067) ).
cnf(i_0_435,plain,
( iext(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(X4,X3,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X4,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rkknj5op/lgb.p',i_0_435) ).
cnf(i_0_1068,plain,
iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,uri_ex_p2,uri_ex_p1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rkknj5op/lgb.p',i_0_1068) ).
cnf(i_0_676,plain,
( ip(X1)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rkknj5op/lgb.p',i_0_676) ).
cnf(i_0_111,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
| iext(X1,esk25_1(X1),esk26_1(X1))
| ~ ip(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rkknj5op/lgb.p',i_0_111) ).
cnf(i_0_112,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
| iext(X1,esk24_1(X1),esk26_1(X1))
| ~ ip(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rkknj5op/lgb.p',i_0_112) ).
cnf(i_0_110,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
| esk25_1(X1) != esk24_1(X1)
| ~ ip(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rkknj5op/lgb.p',i_0_110) ).
cnf(i_0_1087,plain,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)
| ~ icext(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rkknj5op/lgb.p',i_0_1087) ).
cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p2,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rkknj5op/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(c_0_1100,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ icext(uri_owl_FunctionalProperty,X3)
| ~ iext(X3,X4,X2)
| ~ iext(X3,X4,X1) ),
i_0_108 ).
cnf(c_0_1101,plain,
( icext(X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X2,X1) ),
i_0_1088 ).
cnf(c_0_1102,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X3,uri_owl_FunctionalProperty)
| ~ iext(X3,X4,X2)
| ~ iext(X3,X4,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1100,c_0_1101]) ).
cnf(c_0_1103,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p1,uri_owl_FunctionalProperty),
i_0_1067 ).
cnf(c_0_1104,plain,
( iext(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(X4,X3,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X4,X1) ),
i_0_435 ).
cnf(c_0_1105,plain,
iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,uri_ex_p2,uri_ex_p1),
i_0_1068 ).
cnf(c_0_1106,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ iext(uri_ex_p1,X3,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_p1,X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1102,c_0_1103]) ).
cnf(c_0_1107,plain,
( iext(uri_ex_p1,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_p2,X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1104,c_0_1105]) ).
cnf(c_0_1108,plain,
( ip(X1)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,X1,X2) ),
i_0_676 ).
cnf(c_0_1109,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ iext(uri_ex_p1,X3,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_p2,X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1106,c_0_1107]) ).
cnf(c_0_1110,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
| iext(X1,esk25_1(X1),esk26_1(X1))
| ~ ip(X1) ),
i_0_111 ).
cnf(c_0_1111,plain,
ip(uri_ex_p2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1108,c_0_1105]) ).
cnf(c_0_1112,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ iext(uri_ex_p2,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_p2,X1,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1109,c_0_1107]) ).
cnf(c_0_1113,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p2)
| iext(uri_ex_p2,esk25_1(uri_ex_p2),esk26_1(uri_ex_p2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1110,c_0_1111]) ).
cnf(c_0_1114,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
| iext(X1,esk24_1(X1),esk26_1(X1))
| ~ ip(X1) ),
i_0_112 ).
cnf(c_0_1115,plain,
( X1 = esk25_1(uri_ex_p2)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p2)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_p2,X1,esk26_1(uri_ex_p2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1112,c_0_1113]) ).
cnf(c_0_1116,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p2)
| iext(uri_ex_p2,esk24_1(uri_ex_p2),esk26_1(uri_ex_p2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1114,c_0_1111]) ).
cnf(c_0_1117,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
| esk25_1(X1) != esk24_1(X1)
| ~ ip(X1) ),
i_0_110 ).
cnf(c_0_1118,plain,
( esk24_1(uri_ex_p2) = esk25_1(uri_ex_p2)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1115,c_0_1116]) ).
cnf(c_0_1119,plain,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)
| ~ icext(X2,X1) ),
i_0_1087 ).
cnf(c_0_1120,plain,
icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1117,c_0_1118]),c_0_1111])]) ).
cnf(c_0_1121,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p2,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_1122,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1119,c_0_1120]),c_0_1121]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWB047+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 02:09:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.47 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 10.98/3.10 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 10.98/3.10 # No SInE strategy applied
% 10.98/3.10 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 10.98/3.10 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 10.98/3.10 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 10.98/3.10 #
% 10.98/3.10 # Preprocessing time : 0.030 s
% 10.98/3.10 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 10.98/3.10
% 10.98/3.10 # Proof found!
% 10.98/3.10 # SZS status Theorem
% 10.98/3.10 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 10.98/3.10 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 10.98/3.10
% 10.98/3.10 # -------------------------------------------------
% 10.98/3.10 # User time : 0.370 s
% 10.98/3.10 # System time : 0.020 s
% 10.98/3.10 # Total time : 0.390 s
% 10.98/3.10 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 10.98/3.10
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------