TSTP Solution File: SWB046+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWB046+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:02:09 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.56s 47.73s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 40 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 146 ( 14 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 26 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 167 ( 61 ~; 70 |; 27 &)
% ( 5 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 18 ( 18 usr; 12 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 67 ( 10 sgn 40 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_enum_class_001,axiom,
! [X11,X12,X21] :
( ( iext(uri_rdf_first,X12,X21)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,X12,uri_rdf_nil) )
=> ( iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X11,X12)
<=> ( ic(X11)
& ! [X4] :
( icext(X11,X4)
<=> X4 = X21 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_enum_class_001) ).
fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_char_inversefunc_ext,axiom,
? [X37,X42] :
( iext(uri_rdf_first,X42,uri_ex_x)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,X42,uri_rdf_nil)
& iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X37,X42)
& iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y)
& iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_ex_p,X37) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',premise_rdfbased_sem_char_inversefunc_ext) ).
fof(owl_rdfsext_domain,axiom,
! [X2,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X2,X5)
<=> ( ip(X2)
& ic(X5)
& ! [X4,X7] :
( iext(X2,X4,X7)
=> icext(X5,X4) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_rdfsext_domain) ).
fof(owl_char_inversefunctional,axiom,
! [X2] :
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X2)
<=> ( ip(X2)
& ! [X37,X38,X7] :
( ( iext(X2,X37,X7)
& iext(X2,X38,X7) )
=> X37 = X38 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_char_inversefunctional) ).
fof(simple_iext_property,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( iext(X2,X1,X3)
=> ip(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',simple_iext_property) ).
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_char_inversefunc_ext,conjecture,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_char_inversefunc_ext) ).
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
<=> icext(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X22,X23,X24,X25,X25] :
( ( ic(X22)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X22,X23)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X23,X24)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X23,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( ~ icext(X22,X25)
| X25 = X24
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X22,X23)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X23,X24)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X23,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( X25 != X24
| icext(X22,X25)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X22,X23)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X23,X24)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X23,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( ~ icext(X22,esk14_3(X22,X23,X24))
| esk14_3(X22,X23,X24) != X24
| ~ ic(X22)
| iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X22,X23)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X23,X24)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X23,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( icext(X22,esk14_3(X22,X23,X24))
| esk14_3(X22,X23,X24) = X24
| ~ ic(X22)
| iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X22,X23)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X23,X24)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X23,uri_rdf_nil) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_enum_class_001])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
( iext(uri_rdf_first,esk5_0,uri_ex_x)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk5_0,uri_rdf_nil)
& iext(uri_owl_oneOf,esk4_0,esk5_0)
& iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y)
& iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_ex_p,esk4_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_char_inversefunc_ext])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X8,X9,X10,X11,X8,X9] :
( ( ip(X8)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X8,X9) )
& ( ic(X9)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X8,X9) )
& ( ~ iext(X8,X10,X11)
| icext(X9,X10)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X8,X9) )
& ( iext(X8,esk6_2(X8,X9),esk7_2(X8,X9))
| ~ ip(X8)
| ~ ic(X9)
| iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X8,X9) )
& ( ~ icext(X9,esk6_2(X8,X9))
| ~ ip(X8)
| ~ ic(X9)
| iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X8,X9) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_rdfsext_domain])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X39,X40,X41,X42,X39] :
( ( ip(X39)
| ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X39) )
& ( ~ iext(X39,X40,X42)
| ~ iext(X39,X41,X42)
| X40 = X41
| ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X39) )
& ( iext(X39,esk1_1(X39),esk3_1(X39))
| ~ ip(X39)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X39) )
& ( iext(X39,esk2_1(X39),esk3_1(X39))
| ~ ip(X39)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X39) )
& ( esk1_1(X39) != esk2_1(X39)
| ~ ip(X39)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X39) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_char_inversefunctional])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( X4 = X2
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X1,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X3,X1)
| ~ icext(X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_first,esk5_0,uri_ex_x),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk5_0,uri_rdf_nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( icext(X2,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(X1,X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
| iext(X1,esk2_1(X1),esk3_1(X1))
| ~ ip(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ip(X1)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( uri_ex_x = X1
| ~ icext(X2,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X2,esk5_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
iext(uri_owl_oneOf,esk4_0,esk5_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( icext(X1,esk2_1(X2))
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X2,X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_ex_p,esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ iext(X5,X4,X6)
| ip(X5) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[simple_iext_property])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
| iext(X1,esk1_1(X1),esk3_1(X1))
| ~ ip(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( uri_ex_x = X1
| ~ icext(esk4_0,X1) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( icext(esk4_0,esk2_1(uri_ex_p))
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ip(X1)
| ~ iext(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( icext(X1,esk1_1(X2))
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X2,X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_22]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1)
| ~ ip(X1)
| esk1_1(X1) != esk2_1(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( esk2_1(uri_ex_p) = uri_ex_x
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
ip(uri_ex_p),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
fof(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_char_inversefunc_ext]) ).
fof(c_0_32,plain,
! [X6,X7,X6,X7] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X6,X7)
| icext(X7,X6) )
& ( ~ icext(X7,X6)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X6,X7) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( icext(esk4_0,esk1_1(uri_ex_p))
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p)
| esk1_1(uri_ex_p) != uri_ex_x ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30])]) ).
fof(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)
| ~ icext(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,uri_ex_p),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_33]),c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_38]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWB046+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 12:39:37 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.41/23.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.41/23.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.41/23.51 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.41/23.54 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.49 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.52 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.53 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.59 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/47.73 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.56/47.73 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.56/47.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.028 s
% 0.56/47.73
% 0.56/47.73 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.56/47.73 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.56/47.73 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.56/47.73 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 523
% 0.56/47.73 # Initial clauses : 57
% 0.56/47.73 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.56/47.73 # Initial clauses in saturation : 45
% 0.56/47.73 # Processed clauses : 474
% 0.56/47.73 # ...of these trivial : 11
% 0.56/47.73 # ...subsumed : 195
% 0.56/47.73 # ...remaining for further processing : 268
% 0.56/47.73 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Generated clauses : 642
% 0.56/47.73 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 429
% 0.56/47.73 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 64
% 0.56/47.73 # Paramodulations : 642
% 0.56/47.73 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Current number of processed clauses : 268
% 0.56/47.73 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 39
% 0.56/47.73 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.56/47.73 # Non-unit-clauses : 228
% 0.56/47.73 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.56/47.73 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.56/47.73 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 14276
% 0.56/47.73 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5478
% 0.56/47.73 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 259
% 0.56/47.73 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14
% 0.56/47.73 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.56/47.73 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Termbank termtop insertions : 18404
% 0.56/47.73
% 0.56/47.73 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/47.73 # User time : 0.059 s
% 0.56/47.73 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.56/47.73 # Total time : 0.064 s
% 0.56/47.73 # Maximum resident set size: 4512 pages
% 0.56/47.73 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.56/47.73
% 0.56/47.73 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.56/47.73 # OLD status Res
% 0.56/47.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.090 s
% 0.56/47.73 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_eb48853eb71ccd2a6fdade56c25b63f5692e1a0c for 23 seconds:
% 0.56/47.73
% 0.56/47.73 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.56/47.73 # OLD status Res
% 0.56/47.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.047 s
% 0.56/47.73 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_761a0d093d9701c0eed884aebb46468e8d439c31 for 23 seconds:
% 0.56/47.73 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.2,,,100,1.0)
% 0.56/47.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.56/47.73
% 0.56/47.73 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.56/47.73 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.56/47.73 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.56/47.73 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 526
% 0.56/47.73 # Initial clauses : 54
% 0.56/47.73 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.56/47.73 # Initial clauses in saturation : 42
% 0.56/47.73 # Processed clauses : 373
% 0.56/47.73 # ...of these trivial : 13
% 0.56/47.73 # ...subsumed : 149
% 0.56/47.73 # ...remaining for further processing : 211
% 0.56/47.73 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Generated clauses : 542
% 0.56/47.73 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 331
% 0.56/47.73 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 64
% 0.56/47.73 # Paramodulations : 542
% 0.56/47.73 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Current number of processed clauses : 211
% 0.56/47.73 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 37
% 0.56/47.73 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.56/47.73 # Non-unit-clauses : 173
% 0.56/47.73 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.56/47.73 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.56/47.73 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4096
% 0.56/47.73 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1756
% 0.56/47.73 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 213
% 0.56/47.73 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 125
% 0.56/47.73 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.56/47.73 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Termbank termtop insertions : 16301
% 0.56/47.73
% 0.56/47.73 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/47.73 # User time : 0.024 s
% 0.56/47.73 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.56/47.73 # Total time : 0.026 s
% 0.56/47.73 # Maximum resident set size: 4508 pages
% 0.56/47.73 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_bb5e3cecdbc7660bd3a6f864cadb7769d8aea26a for 23 seconds:
% 0.56/47.73 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,,500,1.0)
% 0.56/47.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 0.56/47.73
% 0.56/47.73 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.56/47.73 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.56/47.73 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.56/47.73 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 554
% 0.56/47.73 # Initial clauses : 11
% 0.56/47.73 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Initial clauses in saturation : 11
% 0.56/47.73 # Processed clauses : 11
% 0.56/47.73 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.56/47.73 # ...remaining for further processing : 10
% 0.56/47.73 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Current number of processed clauses : 10
% 0.56/47.73 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.56/47.73 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.56/47.73 # Non-unit-clauses : 8
% 0.56/47.73 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.56/47.73 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.56/47.73 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.56/47.73 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.56/47.73 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7585
% 0.56/47.73
% 0.56/47.73 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/47.73 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.56/47.73 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.56/47.73 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.56/47.73 # Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 0.56/47.73 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_e252f7803940d118fa0ef69fc2319cb55aee23b9 for 23 seconds:
% 0.56/47.73 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.4,,03,100,1.0)
% 0.56/47.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 0.56/47.73
% 0.56/47.73 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.56/47.73 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.56/47.73 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.56/47.73 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 525
% 0.56/47.73 # Initial clauses : 55
% 0.56/47.73 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.56/47.73 # Initial clauses in saturation : 43
% 0.56/47.73 # Processed clauses : 448
% 0.56/47.73 # ...of these trivial : 16
% 0.56/47.73 # ...subsumed : 163
% 0.56/47.73 # ...remaining for further processing : 269
% 0.56/47.73 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Backward-subsumed : 11
% 0.56/47.73 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Generated clauses : 644
% 0.56/47.73 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 409
% 0.56/47.73 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Paramodulations : 644
% 0.56/47.73 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Current number of processed clauses : 258
% 0.56/47.73 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 37
% 0.56/47.73 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.56/47.73 # Non-unit-clauses : 220
% 0.56/47.73 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.56/47.73 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Current number of archived clauses : 12
% 0.56/47.73 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4118
% 0.56/47.73 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1215
% 0.56/47.73 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 174
% 0.56/47.73 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 0.56/47.73 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.56/47.73 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Termbank termtop insertions : 18869
% 0.56/47.73
% 0.56/47.73 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/47.73 # User time : 0.023 s
% 0.56/47.73 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.56/47.73 # Total time : 0.027 s
% 0.56/47.73 # Maximum resident set size: 4776 pages
% 0.56/47.73 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_b1d72019af42f5b571a6c0b233a5b6d1de064075 for 23 seconds:
% 0.56/47.73 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,500,1.0)
% 0.56/47.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.56/47.73
% 0.56/47.73 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.56/47.73 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.56/47.73 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.56/47.73 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 527
% 0.56/47.73 # Initial clauses : 49
% 0.56/47.73 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.56/47.73 # Initial clauses in saturation : 37
% 0.56/47.73 # Processed clauses : 6548
% 0.56/47.73 # ...of these trivial : 14
% 0.56/47.73 # ...subsumed : 5386
% 0.56/47.73 # ...remaining for further processing : 1148
% 0.56/47.73 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Backward-subsumed : 801
% 0.56/47.73 # Backward-rewritten : 251
% 0.56/47.73 # Generated clauses : 34295
% 0.56/47.73 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 32458
% 0.56/47.73 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 10995
% 0.56/47.73 # Paramodulations : 34295
% 0.56/47.73 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Current number of processed clauses : 96
% 0.56/47.73 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 25
% 0.56/47.73 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.56/47.73 # Non-unit-clauses : 69
% 0.56/47.73 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.56/47.73 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Current number of archived clauses : 1053
% 0.56/47.73 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 247663
% 0.56/47.73 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 75038
% 0.56/47.73 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 17169
% 0.56/47.73 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 340
% 0.56/47.73 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # BW rewrite match attempts : 7
% 0.56/47.73 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.56/47.73 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Termbank termtop insertions : 546753
% 0.56/47.73
% 0.56/47.73 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/47.73 # User time : 0.519 s
% 0.56/47.73 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.56/47.73 # Total time : 0.523 s
% 0.56/47.73 # Maximum resident set size: 10568 pages
% 0.56/47.73 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_e96ef4641ae500918cdd95fcfce21e29f2ac5eec for 23 seconds:
% 0.56/47.73 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,6.0,,03,100,1.0)
% 0.56/47.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.021 s
% 0.56/47.73
% 0.56/47.73 # Proof found!
% 0.56/47.73 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.56/47.73 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.56/47.73 # Proof object total steps : 40
% 0.56/47.73 # Proof object clause steps : 25
% 0.56/47.73 # Proof object formula steps : 15
% 0.56/47.73 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 0.56/47.73 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 0.56/47.73 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.56/47.73 # Proof object initial clauses used : 14
% 0.56/47.73 # Proof object initial formulas used : 7
% 0.56/47.73 # Proof object generating inferences : 11
% 0.56/47.73 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 8
% 0.56/47.73 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.56/47.73 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.56/47.73 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 459
% 0.56/47.73 # Initial clauses : 218
% 0.56/47.73 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 20
% 0.56/47.73 # Initial clauses in saturation : 198
% 0.56/47.73 # Processed clauses : 1067
% 0.56/47.73 # ...of these trivial : 74
% 0.56/47.73 # ...subsumed : 319
% 0.56/47.73 # ...remaining for further processing : 674
% 0.56/47.73 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 10
% 0.56/47.73 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Backward-subsumed : 7
% 0.56/47.73 # Backward-rewritten : 7
% 0.56/47.73 # Generated clauses : 1945
% 0.56/47.73 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1536
% 0.56/47.73 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 132
% 0.56/47.73 # Paramodulations : 1935
% 0.56/47.73 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Equation resolutions : 10
% 0.56/47.73 # Current number of processed clauses : 650
% 0.56/47.73 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 159
% 0.56/47.73 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.56/47.73 # Non-unit-clauses : 490
% 0.56/47.73 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 662
% 0.56/47.73 # ...number of literals in the above : 4646
% 0.56/47.73 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Current number of archived clauses : 15
% 0.56/47.73 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 45429
% 0.56/47.73 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20930
% 0.56/47.73 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 458
% 0.56/47.73 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2330
% 0.56/47.73 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # BW rewrite match attempts : 24
% 0.56/47.73 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.56/47.73 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.56/47.73 # Termbank termtop insertions : 37066
% 0.56/47.73
% 0.56/47.73 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/47.73 # User time : 0.055 s
% 0.56/47.73 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.56/47.73 # Total time : 0.062 s
% 0.56/47.73 # Maximum resident set size: 6108 pages
% 0.56/69.52 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/69.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/69.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/69.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/69.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/69.54 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/69.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/69.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/69.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/69.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/69.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/69.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/69.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/69.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/69.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/69.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/69.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/69.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/69.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/69.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/69.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/69.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/69.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/69.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/69.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/69.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/69.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/69.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/69.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/69.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/69.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/69.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/69.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/69.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/69.65 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/69.66 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/69.66 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/69.67 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/69.67 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/69.67 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/69.67 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------