TSTP Solution File: SWB044+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWB044+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:02:09 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.54s 46.71s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.54s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 54 ( 18 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 192 ( 16 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 26 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 215 ( 77 ~; 84 |; 42 &)
% ( 7 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 23 ( 23 usr; 16 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 91 ( 15 sgn 54 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_enum_class_001,axiom,
! [X11,X12,X21] :
( ( iext(uri_rdf_first,X12,X21)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,X12,uri_rdf_nil) )
=> ( iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X11,X12)
<=> ( ic(X11)
& ! [X4] :
( icext(X11,X4)
<=> X4 = X21 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_enum_class_001) ).
fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_char_asymmetric_ext,axiom,
? [X38,X42,X43,X37] :
( iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X43,X37)
& iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_ex_p,X38)
& iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,X43)
& iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X38,X42)
& iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y)
& iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,X37,uri_ex_y)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,X37,uri_rdf_nil)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,X42,uri_ex_x)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,X42,uri_rdf_nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',premise_rdfbased_sem_char_asymmetric_ext) ).
fof(owl_rdfsext_range,axiom,
! [X2,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdfs_range,X2,X5)
<=> ( ip(X2)
& ip(X5)
& ! [X4,X7] :
( iext(X2,X4,X7)
=> icext(X5,X7) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_rdfsext_range) ).
fof(owl_char_asymmetric,axiom,
! [X2] :
( icext(uri_owl_AsymmetricProperty,X2)
<=> ( ip(X2)
& ! [X4,X7] :
( iext(X2,X4,X7)
=> ~ iext(X2,X7,X4) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_char_asymmetric) ).
fof(simple_iext_property,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( iext(X2,X1,X3)
=> ip(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',simple_iext_property) ).
fof(owl_rdfsext_domain,axiom,
! [X2,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X2,X5)
<=> ( ip(X2)
& ic(X5)
& ! [X4,X7] :
( iext(X2,X4,X7)
=> icext(X5,X4) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_rdfsext_domain) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_differentfrom,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X4,X7)
<=> X4 != X7 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_eqdis_differentfrom) ).
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_char_asymmetric_ext,conjecture,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_AsymmetricProperty),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_char_asymmetric_ext) ).
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
<=> icext(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X22,X23,X24,X25,X25] :
( ( ic(X22)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X22,X23)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X23,X24)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X23,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( ~ icext(X22,X25)
| X25 = X24
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X22,X23)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X23,X24)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X23,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( X25 != X24
| icext(X22,X25)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X22,X23)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X23,X24)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X23,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( ~ icext(X22,esk15_3(X22,X23,X24))
| esk15_3(X22,X23,X24) != X24
| ~ ic(X22)
| iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X22,X23)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X23,X24)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X23,uri_rdf_nil) )
& ( icext(X22,esk15_3(X22,X23,X24))
| esk15_3(X22,X23,X24) = X24
| ~ ic(X22)
| iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X22,X23)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X23,X24)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X23,uri_rdf_nil) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_enum_class_001])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_oneOf,esk5_0,esk6_0)
& iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_ex_p,esk3_0)
& iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,esk5_0)
& iext(uri_owl_oneOf,esk3_0,esk4_0)
& iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y)
& iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,esk6_0,uri_ex_y)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk6_0,uri_rdf_nil)
& iext(uri_rdf_first,esk4_0,uri_ex_x)
& iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk4_0,uri_rdf_nil) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_char_asymmetric_ext])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X8,X9,X10,X11,X8,X9] :
( ( ip(X8)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_range,X8,X9) )
& ( ip(X9)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_range,X8,X9) )
& ( ~ iext(X8,X10,X11)
| icext(X9,X11)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_range,X8,X9) )
& ( iext(X8,esk9_2(X8,X9),esk10_2(X8,X9))
| ~ ip(X8)
| ~ ip(X9)
| iext(uri_rdfs_range,X8,X9) )
& ( ~ icext(X9,esk10_2(X8,X9))
| ~ ip(X8)
| ~ ip(X9)
| iext(uri_rdfs_range,X8,X9) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_rdfsext_range])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X8,X9,X10,X8] :
( ( ip(X8)
| ~ icext(uri_owl_AsymmetricProperty,X8) )
& ( ~ iext(X8,X9,X10)
| ~ iext(X8,X10,X9)
| ~ icext(uri_owl_AsymmetricProperty,X8) )
& ( iext(X8,esk1_1(X8),esk2_1(X8))
| ~ ip(X8)
| icext(uri_owl_AsymmetricProperty,X8) )
& ( iext(X8,esk2_1(X8),esk1_1(X8))
| ~ ip(X8)
| icext(uri_owl_AsymmetricProperty,X8) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[owl_char_asymmetric])])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( X4 = X2
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_rest,X1,uri_rdf_nil)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_first,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X3,X1)
| ~ icext(X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_first,esk6_0,uri_ex_y),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk6_0,uri_rdf_nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( icext(X2,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_range,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(X1,X4,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_AsymmetricProperty,X1)
| iext(X1,esk2_1(X1),esk1_1(X1))
| ~ ip(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ip(X1)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_range,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( uri_ex_y = X1
| ~ icext(X2,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X2,esk6_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
iext(uri_owl_oneOf,esk5_0,esk6_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( icext(X1,esk1_1(X2))
| icext(uri_owl_AsymmetricProperty,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_range,X2,X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,esk5_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ iext(X5,X4,X6)
| ip(X5) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[simple_iext_property])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( uri_ex_y = X1
| ~ icext(esk5_0,X1) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( icext(esk5_0,esk1_1(uri_ex_p))
| icext(uri_owl_AsymmetricProperty,uri_ex_p) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ip(X1)
| ~ iext(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_28,plain,
! [X8,X9,X10,X11,X8,X9] :
( ( ip(X8)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X8,X9) )
& ( ic(X9)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X8,X9) )
& ( ~ iext(X8,X10,X11)
| icext(X9,X10)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X8,X9) )
& ( iext(X8,esk7_2(X8,X9),esk8_2(X8,X9))
| ~ ip(X8)
| ~ ic(X9)
| iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X8,X9) )
& ( ~ icext(X9,esk7_2(X8,X9))
| ~ ip(X8)
| ~ ic(X9)
| iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X8,X9) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_rdfsext_domain])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_AsymmetricProperty,X1)
| iext(X1,esk1_1(X1),esk2_1(X1))
| ~ ip(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( esk1_1(uri_ex_p) = uri_ex_y
| icext(uri_owl_AsymmetricProperty,uri_ex_p) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
ip(uri_ex_p),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_first,esk4_0,uri_ex_x),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_rest,esk4_0,uri_rdf_nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( icext(X2,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(X1,X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_AsymmetricProperty,uri_ex_p)
| iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_y,esk2_1(uri_ex_p)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( uri_ex_x = X1
| ~ icext(X2,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_oneOf,X2,esk4_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_32]),c_0_33])]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
iext(uri_owl_oneOf,esk3_0,esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( icext(uri_owl_AsymmetricProperty,uri_ex_p)
| icext(X1,uri_ex_y)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_ex_p,X1) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_ex_p,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_40,plain,
! [X8,X9,X8,X9] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X8,X9)
| X8 != X9 )
& ( X8 = X9
| iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X8,X9) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_differentfrom])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( uri_ex_x = X1
| ~ icext(esk3_0,X1) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
( icext(esk3_0,uri_ex_y)
| icext(uri_owl_AsymmetricProperty,uri_ex_p) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( X1 != X2
| ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_40]) ).
fof(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_AsymmetricProperty),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_char_asymmetric_ext]) ).
fof(c_0_45,plain,
! [X6,X7,X6,X7] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X6,X7)
| icext(X7,X6) )
& ( ~ icext(X7,X6)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X6,X7) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_x,uri_ex_y),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
( uri_ex_y = uri_ex_x
| icext(uri_owl_AsymmetricProperty,uri_ex_p) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X1,X1),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_43]) ).
fof(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_AsymmetricProperty),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_44]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)
| ~ icext(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_45]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
icext(uri_owl_AsymmetricProperty,uri_ex_p),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]),c_0_48]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_AsymmetricProperty),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_49]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]),c_0_52]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWB044+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 05:16:41 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.40/23.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.40/23.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.40/23.50 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.40/23.57 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.54/46.48 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.54/46.50 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.54/46.52 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.54/46.67 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.54/46.71 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.54/46.71 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.54/46.71 # Preprocessing time : 0.028 s
% 0.54/46.71
% 0.54/46.71 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.54/46.71 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.54/46.71 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.54/46.71 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 523
% 0.54/46.71 # Initial clauses : 56
% 0.54/46.71 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.54/46.71 # Initial clauses in saturation : 44
% 0.54/46.71 # Processed clauses : 479
% 0.54/46.71 # ...of these trivial : 18
% 0.54/46.71 # ...subsumed : 187
% 0.54/46.71 # ...remaining for further processing : 274
% 0.54/46.71 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Generated clauses : 638
% 0.54/46.71 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 435
% 0.54/46.71 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 64
% 0.54/46.71 # Paramodulations : 638
% 0.54/46.71 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Current number of processed clauses : 274
% 0.54/46.71 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 39
% 0.54/46.71 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.54/46.71 # Non-unit-clauses : 234
% 0.54/46.71 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.54/46.71 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.54/46.71 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10446
% 0.54/46.71 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3754
% 0.54/46.71 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 251
% 0.54/46.71 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21
% 0.54/46.71 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.54/46.71 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Termbank termtop insertions : 18560
% 0.54/46.71
% 0.54/46.71 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/46.71 # User time : 0.058 s
% 0.54/46.71 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.54/46.71 # Total time : 0.062 s
% 0.54/46.71 # Maximum resident set size: 4508 pages
% 0.54/46.71 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.54/46.71
% 0.54/46.71 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.54/46.71 # OLD status Res
% 0.54/46.71 # Preprocessing time : 0.090 s
% 0.54/46.71 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_eb48853eb71ccd2a6fdade56c25b63f5692e1a0c for 23 seconds:
% 0.54/46.71
% 0.54/46.71 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.54/46.71 # OLD status Res
% 0.54/46.71 # Preprocessing time : 0.045 s
% 0.54/46.71 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_761a0d093d9701c0eed884aebb46468e8d439c31 for 23 seconds:
% 0.54/46.71 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.2,,,100,1.0)
% 0.54/46.71 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 0.54/46.71
% 0.54/46.71 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.54/46.71 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.54/46.71 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.54/46.71 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 526
% 0.54/46.71 # Initial clauses : 53
% 0.54/46.71 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.54/46.71 # Initial clauses in saturation : 41
% 0.54/46.71 # Processed clauses : 364
% 0.54/46.71 # ...of these trivial : 12
% 0.54/46.71 # ...subsumed : 138
% 0.54/46.71 # ...remaining for further processing : 214
% 0.54/46.71 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Generated clauses : 532
% 0.54/46.71 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 323
% 0.54/46.71 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 64
% 0.54/46.71 # Paramodulations : 532
% 0.54/46.71 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Current number of processed clauses : 214
% 0.54/46.71 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 37
% 0.54/46.71 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.54/46.71 # Non-unit-clauses : 176
% 0.54/46.71 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.54/46.71 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.54/46.71 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4754
% 0.54/46.71 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2185
% 0.54/46.71 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 202
% 0.54/46.71 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 91
% 0.54/46.71 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.54/46.71 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Termbank termtop insertions : 16313
% 0.54/46.71
% 0.54/46.71 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/46.71 # User time : 0.022 s
% 0.54/46.71 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.54/46.71 # Total time : 0.025 s
% 0.54/46.71 # Maximum resident set size: 4504 pages
% 0.54/46.71 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_bb5e3cecdbc7660bd3a6f864cadb7769d8aea26a for 23 seconds:
% 0.54/46.71 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,,500,1.0)
% 0.54/46.71 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 0.54/46.71
% 0.54/46.71 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.54/46.71 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.54/46.71 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.54/46.71 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 554
% 0.54/46.71 # Initial clauses : 10
% 0.54/46.71 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Initial clauses in saturation : 10
% 0.54/46.71 # Processed clauses : 10
% 0.54/46.71 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.54/46.71 # ...remaining for further processing : 9
% 0.54/46.71 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Current number of processed clauses : 9
% 0.54/46.71 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.54/46.71 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.54/46.71 # Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.54/46.71 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.54/46.71 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3
% 0.54/46.71 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.54/46.71 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.54/46.71 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7538
% 0.54/46.71
% 0.54/46.71 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/46.71 # User time : 0.010 s
% 0.54/46.71 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.54/46.71 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.54/46.71 # Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.54/46.71 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_e252f7803940d118fa0ef69fc2319cb55aee23b9 for 23 seconds:
% 0.54/46.71 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.4,,03,100,1.0)
% 0.54/46.71 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.54/46.71
% 0.54/46.71 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.54/46.71 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.54/46.71 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.54/46.71 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 525
% 0.54/46.71 # Initial clauses : 54
% 0.54/46.71 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.54/46.71 # Initial clauses in saturation : 42
% 0.54/46.71 # Processed clauses : 445
% 0.54/46.71 # ...of these trivial : 12
% 0.54/46.71 # ...subsumed : 158
% 0.54/46.71 # ...remaining for further processing : 275
% 0.54/46.71 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Backward-subsumed : 11
% 0.54/46.71 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Generated clauses : 640
% 0.54/46.71 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 405
% 0.54/46.71 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Paramodulations : 640
% 0.54/46.71 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Current number of processed clauses : 264
% 0.54/46.71 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 37
% 0.54/46.71 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.54/46.71 # Non-unit-clauses : 226
% 0.54/46.71 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.54/46.71 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Current number of archived clauses : 12
% 0.54/46.71 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2932
% 0.54/46.71 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 683
% 0.54/46.71 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 169
% 0.54/46.71 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 32
% 0.54/46.71 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.54/46.71 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Termbank termtop insertions : 19072
% 0.54/46.71
% 0.54/46.71 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/46.71 # User time : 0.023 s
% 0.54/46.71 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.54/46.71 # Total time : 0.025 s
% 0.54/46.71 # Maximum resident set size: 4772 pages
% 0.54/46.71 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_b1d72019af42f5b571a6c0b233a5b6d1de064075 for 23 seconds:
% 0.54/46.71 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,500,1.0)
% 0.54/46.71 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.54/46.71
% 0.54/46.71 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.54/46.71 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.54/46.71 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.54/46.71 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 527
% 0.54/46.71 # Initial clauses : 48
% 0.54/46.71 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.54/46.71 # Initial clauses in saturation : 36
% 0.54/46.71 # Processed clauses : 139
% 0.54/46.71 # ...of these trivial : 14
% 0.54/46.71 # ...subsumed : 31
% 0.54/46.71 # ...remaining for further processing : 94
% 0.54/46.71 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Generated clauses : 141
% 0.54/46.71 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 103
% 0.54/46.71 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 16
% 0.54/46.71 # Paramodulations : 141
% 0.54/46.71 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Current number of processed clauses : 94
% 0.54/46.71 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 24
% 0.54/46.71 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.54/46.71 # Non-unit-clauses : 67
% 0.54/46.71 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.54/46.71 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.54/46.71 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 496
% 0.54/46.71 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 346
% 0.54/46.71 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 39
% 0.54/46.71 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.54/46.71 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.54/46.71 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10486
% 0.54/46.71
% 0.54/46.71 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/46.71 # User time : 0.016 s
% 0.54/46.71 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.54/46.71 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.54/46.71 # Maximum resident set size: 3960 pages
% 0.54/46.71 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_e96ef4641ae500918cdd95fcfce21e29f2ac5eec for 23 seconds:
% 0.54/46.71 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,6.0,,03,100,1.0)
% 0.54/46.71 # Preprocessing time : 0.021 s
% 0.54/46.71
% 0.54/46.71 # Proof found!
% 0.54/46.71 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.54/46.71 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.54/46.71 # Proof object total steps : 54
% 0.54/46.71 # Proof object clause steps : 35
% 0.54/46.71 # Proof object formula steps : 19
% 0.54/46.71 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 0.54/46.71 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 0.54/46.71 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.54/46.71 # Proof object initial clauses used : 20
% 0.54/46.71 # Proof object initial formulas used : 9
% 0.54/46.71 # Proof object generating inferences : 14
% 0.54/46.71 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 10
% 0.54/46.71 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.54/46.71 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.54/46.71 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 459
% 0.54/46.71 # Initial clauses : 224
% 0.54/46.71 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 22
% 0.54/46.71 # Initial clauses in saturation : 202
% 0.54/46.71 # Processed clauses : 1211
% 0.54/46.71 # ...of these trivial : 79
% 0.54/46.71 # ...subsumed : 421
% 0.54/46.71 # ...remaining for further processing : 711
% 0.54/46.71 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 11
% 0.54/46.71 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Backward-subsumed : 11
% 0.54/46.71 # Backward-rewritten : 12
% 0.54/46.71 # Generated clauses : 2317
% 0.54/46.71 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1691
% 0.54/46.71 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 72
% 0.54/46.71 # Paramodulations : 2306
% 0.54/46.71 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Equation resolutions : 11
% 0.54/46.71 # Current number of processed clauses : 677
% 0.54/46.71 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 210
% 0.54/46.71 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.54/46.71 # Non-unit-clauses : 461
% 0.54/46.71 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 670
% 0.54/46.71 # ...number of literals in the above : 4970
% 0.54/46.71 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Current number of archived clauses : 24
% 0.54/46.71 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 61733
% 0.54/46.71 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 31854
% 0.54/46.71 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 398
% 0.54/46.71 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3423
% 0.54/46.71 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # BW rewrite match attempts : 54
% 0.54/46.71 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.54/46.71 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.54/46.71 # Termbank termtop insertions : 39387
% 0.54/46.71
% 0.54/46.71 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/46.71 # User time : 0.067 s
% 0.54/46.71 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.54/46.71 # Total time : 0.069 s
% 0.54/46.71 # Maximum resident set size: 6104 pages
% 0.54/46.73 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.54/46.73 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.54/46.74 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.54/46.74 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.54/46.74 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.54/46.75 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.54/46.75 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.54/46.75 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.54/69.50 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.54/69.51 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.54/69.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.54/69.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.54/69.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.54/69.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.54/69.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.54/69.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.54/69.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.54/69.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.54/69.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.54/69.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.54/69.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.54/69.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.54/69.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.54/69.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.54/69.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.54/69.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.54/69.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.54/69.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.54/69.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.54/69.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.54/69.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.54/69.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.54/69.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.54/69.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.54/69.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.54/69.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.54/69.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.54/69.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.54/69.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.54/69.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.54/69.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.54/69.56 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------