TSTP Solution File: SWB040+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWB040+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:02:08 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.30s 2.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.30s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 32 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 96 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 106 ( 42 ~; 38 |; 19 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 43 ( 4 sgn 25 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_bool_tollens,conjecture,
iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_n2,uri_ex_n1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conclusion_rdfbased_sem_bool_tollens) ).
fof(owl_prop_complementof_ext,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X4,X7)
=> ( ic(X4)
& ic(X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_prop_complementof_ext) ).
fof(owl_bool_complementof_class,axiom,
! [X11,X5] :
( iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X11,X5)
=> ( ic(X11)
& ic(X5)
& ! [X4] :
( icext(X11,X4)
<=> ~ icext(X5,X4) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_bool_complementof_class) ).
fof(owl_rdfsext_subclassof,axiom,
! [X13,X15] :
( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X13,X15)
<=> ( ic(X13)
& ic(X15)
& ! [X4] :
( icext(X13,X4)
=> icext(X15,X4) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_rdfsext_subclassof) ).
fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_bool_tollens,axiom,
( iext(uri_owl_complementOf,uri_ex_n2,uri_ex_c2)
& iext(uri_owl_complementOf,uri_ex_n1,uri_ex_c1)
& iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c1,uri_ex_c2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',premise_rdfbased_sem_bool_tollens) ).
fof(rdfs_subclassof_main,axiom,
! [X5,X6] :
( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X5,X6)
=> ( ic(X5)
& ic(X6)
& ! [X4] :
( icext(X5,X4)
=> icext(X6,X4) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_subclassof_main) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_n2,uri_ex_n1),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_bool_tollens]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X8,X9] :
( ( ic(X8)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X8,X9) )
& ( ic(X9)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X8,X9) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_prop_complementof_ext])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X12,X13,X14,X14] :
( ( ic(X12)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X12,X13) )
& ( ic(X13)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X12,X13) )
& ( ~ icext(X12,X14)
| ~ icext(X13,X14)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X12,X13) )
& ( icext(X13,X14)
| icext(X12,X14)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X12,X13) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[owl_bool_complementof_class])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_n2,uri_ex_n1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X16,X17,X18,X16,X17] :
( ( ic(X16)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X16,X17) )
& ( ic(X17)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X16,X17) )
& ( ~ icext(X16,X18)
| icext(X17,X18)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X16,X17) )
& ( icext(X16,esk109_2(X16,X17))
| ~ ic(X16)
| ~ ic(X17)
| iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X16,X17) )
& ( ~ icext(X17,esk109_2(X16,X17))
| ~ ic(X16)
| ~ ic(X17)
| iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X16,X17) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_rdfsext_subclassof])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ic(X1)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
iext(uri_owl_complementOf,uri_ex_n1,uri_ex_c1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_bool_tollens]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
iext(uri_owl_complementOf,uri_ex_n2,uri_ex_c2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_bool_tollens]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X1,X2)
| ~ icext(X2,X3)
| ~ icext(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_n2,uri_ex_n1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X1,X2)
| icext(X1,esk109_2(X1,X2))
| ~ ic(X2)
| ~ ic(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
ic(uri_ex_n1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
ic(uri_ex_n2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_13]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9] :
( ( ic(X7)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X7,X8) )
& ( ic(X8)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X7,X8) )
& ( ~ icext(X7,X9)
| icext(X8,X9)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X7,X8) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_subclassof_main])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X1,X2)
| ~ ic(X2)
| ~ ic(X1)
| ~ icext(X2,esk109_2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( icext(X1,X3)
| icext(X2,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_complementOf,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ icext(uri_ex_c2,X1)
| ~ icext(uri_ex_n2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
icext(uri_ex_n2,esk109_2(uri_ex_n2,uri_ex_n1)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( icext(X2,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X1,X2)
| ~ icext(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c1,uri_ex_c2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_bool_tollens]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ icext(uri_ex_n1,esk109_2(uri_ex_n2,uri_ex_n1)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_20]),c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( icext(uri_ex_c1,X1)
| icext(uri_ex_n1,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ icext(uri_ex_c2,esk109_2(uri_ex_n2,uri_ex_n1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( icext(uri_ex_c2,X1)
| ~ icext(uri_ex_c1,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
icext(uri_ex_c1,esk109_2(uri_ex_n2,uri_ex_n1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : SWB040+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 13:03:37 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.30/2.48 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.30/2.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.092 s
% 0.30/2.48
% 0.30/2.48 # Proof found!
% 0.30/2.48 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.30/2.48 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.30/2.48 # Proof object total steps : 32
% 0.30/2.48 # Proof object clause steps : 20
% 0.30/2.48 # Proof object formula steps : 12
% 0.30/2.48 # Proof object conjectures : 9
% 0.30/2.48 # Proof object clause conjectures : 6
% 0.30/2.48 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.30/2.48 # Proof object initial clauses used : 10
% 0.30/2.48 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 0.30/2.48 # Proof object generating inferences : 10
% 0.30/2.48 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 8
% 0.30/2.48 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.30/2.48 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.30/2.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.30/2.48 # Initial clauses : 1270
% 0.30/2.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 111
% 0.30/2.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1159
% 0.30/2.48 # Processed clauses : 4746
% 0.30/2.48 # ...of these trivial : 198
% 0.30/2.48 # ...subsumed : 1514
% 0.30/2.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 3034
% 0.30/2.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 16
% 0.30/2.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.30/2.48 # Backward-subsumed : 82
% 0.30/2.48 # Backward-rewritten : 21
% 0.30/2.48 # Generated clauses : 102045
% 0.30/2.48 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 100285
% 0.30/2.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 306
% 0.30/2.48 # Paramodulations : 101999
% 0.30/2.48 # Factorizations : 12
% 0.30/2.48 # Equation resolutions : 16
% 0.30/2.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 2903
% 0.30/2.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 391
% 0.30/2.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.30/2.48 # Negative unit clauses : 25
% 0.30/2.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 2487
% 0.30/2.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 93681
% 0.30/2.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 789905
% 0.30/2.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.30/2.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 112
% 0.30/2.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1383933
% 0.30/2.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 628218
% 0.30/2.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1400
% 0.30/2.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 33036
% 0.30/2.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.30/2.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 49
% 0.30/2.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 11
% 0.30/2.48 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.30/2.48 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.30/2.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2231186
% 0.30/2.48
% 0.30/2.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/2.48 # User time : 1.711 s
% 0.30/2.48 # System time : 0.048 s
% 0.30/2.48 # Total time : 1.759 s
% 0.30/2.48 # Maximum resident set size: 108732 pages
% 0.30/23.47 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.30/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/23.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/23.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/23.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/23.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.53 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.30/23.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.30/23.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.30/23.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.30/23.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.30/23.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.57 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.30/23.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.30/23.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.30/23.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.30/23.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/23.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.30/23.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/23.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.30/23.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/23.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.30/23.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/23.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.61 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/23.61 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.61 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/23.61 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.61 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/23.61 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.30/23.62 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/23.62 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------