TSTP Solution File: SWB030+3 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWB030+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:20:43 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.06s 300.34s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWB030+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 15:10:14 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.75/0.99 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.75/0.99 The process was started by sandbox on n018.cluster.edu,
% 0.75/0.99 Wed Jun 1 15:10:14 2022
% 0.75/0.99 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 13699.
% 0.75/0.99
% 0.75/0.99 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.75/0.99 set(auto).
% 0.75/0.99 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.75/0.99 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.75/0.99 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.75/0.99 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.75/0.99 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.75/0.99 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.75/0.99 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.75/0.99 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.75/0.99 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.75/0.99 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.75/0.99 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.75/0.99 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.75/0.99 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.75/0.99 clear(print_given).
% 0.75/0.99
% 0.75/0.99 formula_list(usable).
% 0.75/0.99
% 0.75/0.99 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=15.
% 0.75/0.99
% 0.75/0.99 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.75/0.99 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.75/0.99 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.75/0.99
% 0.75/0.99 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.75/0.99 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.75/0.99 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.75/0.99
% 0.75/0.99 ------------> process usable:
% 0.75/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_owl_complementOf,A,B)|ic(A).
% 0.75/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 2 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_owl_complementOf,A,B)|ic(B).
% 0.75/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 97 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdf_type,A,uri_rdf_Property)|ip(A).
% 0.75/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 96 during input processing: 0 [] {-} iext(uri_rdf_type,A,uri_rdf_Property)| -ip(A).
% 0.75/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 120 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_domain,A,B)| -iext(A,C,D)|icext(B,C).
% 0.75/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 125 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_range,A,B)| -iext(A,C,D)|icext(B,D).
% 0.75/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 128 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,A,B)|ic(A).
% 0.75/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 129 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,A,B)|ic(B).
% 0.75/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 130 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,A,B)| -icext(A,C)|icext(B,C).
% 0.75/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 133 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,A,B)|ip(A).
% 0.75/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 134 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,A,B)|ip(B).
% 0.75/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 135 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,A,B)| -iext(A,C,D)|iext(B,C,D).
% 0.75/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 103 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -lv(A)|ir(A).
% 0.75/0.99 110 back subsumes 25.
% 0.75/0.99 110 back subsumes 16.
% 0.75/0.99 110 back subsumes 10.
% 0.75/0.99 110 back subsumes 5.
% 0.75/0.99 116 back subsumes 55.
% 0.75/0.99 116 back subsumes 46.
% 0.75/0.99 116 back subsumes 40.
% 0.75/0.99 116 back subsumes 37.
% 0.75/0.99 173 back subsumes 170.
% 0.75/0.99 203 back subsumes 193.
% 0.75/0.99 211 back subsumes 204.
% 0.75/0.99 211 back subsumes 194.
% 0.75/0.99 230 back subsumes 227.
% 0.75/0.99 258 back subsumes 248.
% 0.75/0.99 266 back subsumes 259.
% 0.75/0.99 266 back subsumes 249.
% 0.75/0.99 323 back subsumes 300.
% 0.75/0.99 331 back subsumes 311.
% 0.75/0.99 338 back subsumes 294.
% 0.75/0.99 426 back subsumes 403.
% 0.75/0.99 434 back subsumes 414.
% 0.75/0.99 441 back subsumes 397.
% 0.75/0.99 475 back subsumes 461.
% 0.75/0.99 479 back subsumes 466.
% 0.75/0.99 484 back subsumes 455.
% 0.75/0.99 561 back subsumes 547.
% 0.75/0.99 565 back subsumes 552.
% 0.75/0.99 570 back subsumes 541.
% 0.75/0.99
% 0.75/0.99 ------------> process sos:
% 0.75/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 606 during input processing: 0 [] {-} iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_rdf_type,uri_rdf_Property).
% 0.75/0.99 Following clause subsumed by 644 during input processing: 0 [] {-} iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_rdf_predicate,uri_rdfs_Resource).
% 0.75/0.99 656 back subsumes 589.
% 0.75/0.99 656 back subsumes 154.
% 0.75/0.99 656 back subsumes 109.
% 0.75/0.99 656 back subsumes 103.
% 0.75/0.99 656 back subsumes 100.
% 0.75/0.99 656 back subsumes 99.
% 0.75/0.99 656 back subsumes 95.
% 0.75/0.99 656 back subsumes 94.
% 0.75/0.99 656 back subsumes 93.
% 0.75/0.99 656 back subsumes 83.
% 0.75/0.99 656 back subsumes 79.
% 0.75/0.99 656 back subsumes 78.
% 0.75/0.99 656 back subsumes 71.
% 0.75/0.99 656 back subsumes 70.
% 0.75/0.99 656 back subsumes 68.
% 0.75/0.99 656 back subsumes 8.
% 0.75/0.99 656 back subsumes 6.
% 0.75/0.99
% 0.75/0.99 ======= end of input processing =======
% 3.19/3.46
% 3.19/3.46 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.19/3.46
% 3.19/3.46
% 3.19/3.46 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 3.19/3.46
% 3.19/3.46
% 3.19/3.46
% 3.19/3.46 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 3.19/3.46
% 3.19/3.46 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 3.19/3.46 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 3.19/3.46 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 3.19/3.46 number of clauses in intial UL: 542
% 3.19/3.46 number of clauses initially in problem: 616
% 3.19/3.46 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 87
% 3.19/3.46 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 70
% 3.19/3.46 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 3.19/3.46 absolute distinct symbol count: 82
% 3.19/3.46 distinct predicate count: 11
% 3.19/3.46 distinct function count: 18
% 3.19/3.46 distinct constant count: 53
% 3.19/3.46
% 3.19/3.46 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 3.19/3.46
% 3.19/3.46
% 3.19/3.46
% 3.19/3.46 =========== start of search ===========
% 3.61/3.82
% 3.61/3.82
% 3.61/3.82 Changing weight limit from 60 to 27.
% 3.61/3.82
% 3.61/3.82 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 3.61/3.82
% 3.61/3.82
% 3.61/3.82 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 510 givens.
% 3.61/3.82
% 3.70/3.89
% 3.70/3.89
% 3.70/3.89 Changing weight limit from 27 to 22.
% 3.70/3.89
% 3.70/3.89 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 525 givens.
% 3.70/3.89
% 3.83/4.02
% 3.83/4.02
% 3.83/4.02 Changing weight limit from 22 to 20.
% 3.83/4.02
% 3.83/4.02 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 535 givens.
% 3.83/4.02
% 3.90/4.14
% 3.90/4.14
% 3.90/4.14 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 3.90/4.14
% 3.90/4.14 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 545 givens.
% 3.90/4.14
% 4.06/4.30
% 4.06/4.30
% 4.06/4.30 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 4.06/4.30
% 4.06/4.30 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 590 givens.
% 4.06/4.30
% 4.20/4.40
% 4.20/4.40
% 4.20/4.40 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 4.20/4.40
% 4.20/4.40 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 615 givens.
% 4.20/4.40
% 5.09/5.30
% 5.09/5.30
% 5.09/5.30 Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 5.09/5.30
% 5.09/5.30 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 905 givens.
% 5.09/5.30
% 5.50/5.68
% 5.50/5.68
% 5.50/5.68 Changing weight limit from 16 to 15.
% 5.50/5.68
% 5.50/5.68 Resetting weight limit to 15 after 970 givens.
% 5.50/5.68
% 5.97/6.25
% 5.97/6.25
% 5.97/6.25 Changing weight limit from 15 to 14.
% 5.97/6.25
% 5.97/6.25 Resetting weight limit to 14 after 1030 givens.
% 5.97/6.25
% 6.76/6.96
% 6.76/6.96
% 6.76/6.96 Changing weight limit from 14 to 13.
% 6.76/6.96
% 6.76/6.96 Resetting weight limit to 13 after 1125 givens.
% 6.76/6.96
% 7.75/7.96
% 7.75/7.96
% 7.75/7.96 Changing weight limit from 13 to 12.
% 7.75/7.96
% 7.75/7.96 Resetting weight limit to 12 after 1300 givens.
% 7.75/7.96
% 54.07/54.28
% 54.07/54.28
% 54.07/54.28 Changing weight limit from 12 to 11.
% 54.07/54.28
% 54.07/54.28 Resetting weight limit to 11 after 5090 givens.
% 54.07/54.28
% 74.46/74.70
% 74.46/74.70
% 74.46/74.70 Changing weight limit from 11 to 10.
% 74.46/74.70
% 74.46/74.70 Resetting weight limit to 10 after 6785 givens.
% 74.46/74.70
% 300.06/300.34 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------