TSTP Solution File: SWB030+2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SWB030+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:01:25 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SWB030+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 06:32:34 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.61 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.61 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 % File : SWB030+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.20/0.62 % Domain : Semantic Web
% 0.20/0.62 % Problem : Bad Class
% 0.20/0.62 % Version : [Sch11] axioms : Reduced > Incomplete.
% 0.20/0.62 % English :
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 % Refs : [Sch11] Schneider, M. (2011), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.62 % Source : [Sch11]
% 0.20/0.62 % Names : 030_Bad_Class [Sch11]
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.62 % Rating : 0.00 v6.4.0, 0.25 v6.3.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.25 v6.1.0, 0.00 v5.2.0
% 0.20/0.62 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 4 ( 0 unt; 0 def)
% 0.20/0.62 % Number of atoms : 16 ( 0 equ)
% 0.20/0.62 % Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 4 avg)
% 0.20/0.62 % Number of connectives : 13 ( 1 ~; 0 |; 7 &)
% 0.20/0.62 % ( 3 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.20/0.62 % Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 7 avg)
% 0.20/0.62 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.62 % Number of predicates : 3 ( 3 usr; 0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 0.20/0.62 % Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.20/0.62 % Number of variables : 10 ( 9 !; 1 ?)
% 0.20/0.62 % SPC : FOF_UNS_RFO_NEQ
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 % Comments :
% 0.20/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62 ! [X,C] :
% 0.20/0.62 ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X,C)
% 0.20/0.62 <=> icext(C,X) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 fof(owl_restrict_hasself,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62 ! [Z,P,V] :
% 0.20/0.62 ( ( iext(uri_owl_hasSelf,Z,V)
% 0.20/0.62 & iext(uri_owl_onProperty,Z,P) )
% 0.20/0.62 => ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.62 ( icext(Z,X)
% 0.20/0.62 <=> iext(P,X,X) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 fof(owl_bool_complementof_class,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62 ! [Z,C] :
% 0.20/0.62 ( iext(uri_owl_complementOf,Z,C)
% 0.20/0.62 => ( ic(Z)
% 0.20/0.62 & ic(C)
% 0.20/0.62 & ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.62 ( icext(Z,X)
% 0.20/0.62 <=> ~ icext(C,X) ) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 fof(testcase_premise_fullish_030_Bad_Class,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62 ? [BNODE_x] :
% 0.20/0.62 ( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_c,uri_owl_Class)
% 0.20/0.62 & iext(uri_owl_complementOf,uri_ex_c,BNODE_x)
% 0.20/0.62 & iext(uri_rdf_type,BNODE_x,uri_owl_Restriction)
% 0.20/0.62 & iext(uri_owl_onProperty,BNODE_x,uri_rdf_type)
% 0.20/0.62 & iext(uri_owl_hasSelf,BNODE_x,literal_typed(dat_str_true,uri_xsd_boolean)) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.62 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.62 %ClaNum:13(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.62 %VarNum:44(SingletonVarNum:22)
% 0.20/0.62 %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.20/0.62 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.20/0.62 %SharedTerms:16
% 0.20/0.62 [1]P1(a1,a2,a6)
% 0.20/0.62 [2]P1(a1,a3,a7)
% 0.20/0.62 [3]P1(a8,a3,a1)
% 0.20/0.62 [4]P1(a9,a2,a3)
% 0.20/0.62 [5]P1(a10,a3,f5(a4,a11))
% 0.20/0.62 [6]~P2(x62,x61)+P1(a1,x61,x62)
% 0.20/0.62 [7]P3(x71)+~P1(a9,x72,x71)
% 0.20/0.62 [8]P3(x81)+~P1(a9,x81,x82)
% 0.20/0.62 [9]P2(x91,x92)+~P1(a1,x92,x91)
% 0.20/0.62 [10]P2(x101,x102)+P2(x103,x102)+~P1(a9,x101,x103)
% 0.20/0.62 [11]~P2(x111,x112)+~P2(x113,x112)+~P1(a9,x113,x111)
% 0.20/0.62 [12]P1(x121,x122,x122)+~P2(x123,x122)+~P1(a8,x123,x121)+~P1(a10,x123,x124)
% 0.20/0.62 [13]P2(x131,x132)+~P1(x133,x132,x132)+~P1(a8,x131,x133)+~P1(a10,x131,x134)
% 0.20/0.62 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63 cnf(16,plain,
% 0.20/0.63 (P2(a3,x161)+~P1(a1,x161,x161)),
% 0.20/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,5,9,11,13])).
% 0.20/0.63 cnf(25,plain,
% 0.20/0.63 (~P2(a3,a2)),
% 0.20/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,3,5,11,10,9,12])).
% 0.20/0.63 cnf(35,plain,
% 0.20/0.63 ($false),
% 0.20/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,4,25,10,9,11,16,6]),
% 0.20/0.63 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.63 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.63 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------