TSTP Solution File: SWB028+2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWB028+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:20:42 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 21.90s 22.07s
% Output : Refutation 21.90s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SWB028+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 03:02:58 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n018.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35 Wed Jun 1 03:02:58 2022
% 0.12/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 29123.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.35 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.35 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.35 clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 3 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,A,B)|ic(A).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,A,B)|ic(B).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,A,B)|ip(A).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 2 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,A,B)|ip(B).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 49 during input processing: 0 [copy,49,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.35 49 back subsumes 33.
% 0.12/0.35 49 back subsumes 32.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.56
% 0.20/0.56 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.20/0.56
% 0.20/0.56
% 0.20/0.56 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.20/0.56
% 0.20/0.56
% 0.20/0.56
% 0.20/0.56 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.56
% 0.20/0.56 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.56 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.56 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.56 number of clauses in intial UL: 41
% 0.20/0.56 number of clauses initially in problem: 47
% 0.20/0.56 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 87
% 0.20/0.56 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 88
% 0.20/0.56 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.56 absolute distinct symbol count: 27
% 0.20/0.56 distinct predicate count: 5
% 0.20/0.56 distinct function count: 11
% 0.20/0.56 distinct constant count: 11
% 0.20/0.56
% 0.20/0.56 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.56
% 0.20/0.56
% 0.20/0.56
% 0.20/0.56 =========== start of search ===========
% 11.96/12.13
% 11.96/12.13
% 11.96/12.13 Changing weight limit from 60 to 31.
% 11.96/12.13
% 11.96/12.13 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 205 givens.
% 11.96/12.13
% 12.93/13.18
% 12.93/13.18
% 12.93/13.18 Changing weight limit from 31 to 28.
% 12.93/13.18
% 12.93/13.18 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 210 givens.
% 12.93/13.18
% 13.84/14.00
% 13.84/14.00
% 13.84/14.00 Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 13.84/14.00
% 13.84/14.00 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 215 givens.
% 13.84/14.00
% 14.69/14.86
% 14.69/14.86
% 14.69/14.86 Changing weight limit from 27 to 26.
% 14.69/14.86
% 14.69/14.86 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 220 givens.
% 14.69/14.86
% 21.44/21.65
% 21.44/21.65
% 21.44/21.65 Changing weight limit from 26 to 25.
% 21.44/21.65
% 21.44/21.65 Resetting weight limit to 25 after 265 givens.
% 21.44/21.65
% 21.90/22.07
% 21.90/22.07 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 21.90/22.07
% 21.90/22.07 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 21.90/22.07
% 21.90/22.07
% 21.90/22.07 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 21.69 sec ----> 7283 [binary,7282.1,31.1] {-} $F.
% 21.90/22.07
% 21.90/22.07 Length of proof is 15. Level of proof is 11.
% 21.90/22.07
% 21.90/22.07 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 21.90/22.07 % SZS status Theorem
% 21.90/22.07 % SZS output start Refutation
% 21.90/22.07
% 21.90/22.07 1 [] {+} -iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,A,B)|ip(A).
% 21.90/22.07 3 [] {+} -iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,A,B)|ic(A).
% 21.90/22.07 6 [] {+} -icext(uri_owl_FunctionalProperty,A)| -iext(A,B,C)| -iext(A,B,D)|C=D.
% 21.90/22.07 12 [] {+} icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,A)| -ip(A)|iext(A,$f6(A),$f4(A)).
% 21.90/22.07 13 [] {+} icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,A)| -ip(A)|iext(A,$f5(A),$f4(A)).
% 21.90/22.07 14 [] {+} icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,A)| -ip(A)|$f6(A)!=$f5(A).
% 21.90/22.07 18 [] {+} iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,A,B)| -ic(A)| -ic(B)|icext(A,$f7(A,B)).
% 21.90/22.07 19 [] {+} iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,A,B)| -ic(A)| -ic(B)| -icext(B,$f7(A,B)).
% 21.90/22.07 20 [] {+} -iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,A,B)| -icext(A,C)|icext(B,C).
% 21.90/22.07 24 [] {+} -iext(uri_owl_someValuesFrom,A,B)| -iext(uri_owl_onProperty,A,C)| -icext(A,D)|iext(C,D,$f9(A,C,B,D)).
% 21.90/22.07 25 [] {+} -iext(uri_owl_someValuesFrom,A,B)| -iext(uri_owl_onProperty,A,C)| -icext(A,D)|icext(B,$f9(A,C,B,D)).
% 21.90/22.07 27 [] {+} -iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,A,B)| -iext(A,C,D)|iext(B,D,C).
% 21.90/22.07 31 [] {+} -iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty).
% 21.90/22.07 44 [] {-} ic(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty).
% 21.90/22.07 45 [] {-} iext(uri_owl_equivalentClass,uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,$c1).
% 21.90/22.07 47 [] {-} iext(uri_owl_onProperty,$c1,uri_owl_inverseOf).
% 21.90/22.07 48 [] {-} iext(uri_owl_someValuesFrom,$c1,uri_owl_FunctionalProperty).
% 21.90/22.07 55 [hyper,45,3] {-} ic(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties).
% 21.90/22.07 78 [hyper,55,18,44,unit_del,31] {-} icext(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,$f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty)).
% 21.90/22.07 99 [hyper,78,20,45] {-} icext($c1,$f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty)).
% 21.90/22.07 108 [hyper,99,25,48,47] {-} icext(uri_owl_FunctionalProperty,$f9($c1,uri_owl_inverseOf,uri_owl_FunctionalProperty,$f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty))).
% 21.90/22.07 109 [hyper,99,24,48,47] {-} iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,$f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),$f9($c1,uri_owl_inverseOf,uri_owl_FunctionalProperty,$f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty))).
% 21.90/22.07 502 [hyper,109,1] {-} ip($f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty)).
% 21.90/22.07 530 [hyper,502,13] {-} icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,$f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty))|iext($f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),$f5($f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty)),$f4($f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty))).
% 21.90/22.07 531 [hyper,502,12] {-} icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,$f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty))|iext($f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),$f6($f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty)),$f4($f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty))).
% 21.90/22.07 7225 [hyper,530,19,55,44,unit_del,31] {-} iext($f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),$f5($f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty)),$f4($f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty))).
% 21.90/22.07 7226 [hyper,7225,27,109] {-} iext($f9($c1,uri_owl_inverseOf,uri_owl_FunctionalProperty,$f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty)),$f4($f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty)),$f5($f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty))).
% 21.90/22.07 7249 [hyper,531,19,55,44,unit_del,31] {-} iext($f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),$f6($f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty)),$f4($f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty))).
% 21.90/22.07 7250 [hyper,7249,27,109] {-} iext($f9($c1,uri_owl_inverseOf,uri_owl_FunctionalProperty,$f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty)),$f4($f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty)),$f6($f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty))).
% 21.90/22.07 7273 [hyper,7250,6,108,7226,flip.1] {-} $f6($f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty))=$f5($f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty)).
% 21.90/22.07 7275 [hyper,7273,14,502] {-} icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,$f7(uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty)).
% 21.90/22.07 7282 [hyper,7275,19,55,44] {-} iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_InversesOfFunctionalProperties,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty).
% 21.90/22.07 7283 [binary,7282.1,31.1] {-} $F.
% 21.90/22.07
% 21.90/22.07 % SZS output end Refutation
% 21.90/22.07 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 21.90/22.07
% 21.90/22.07
% 21.90/22.07 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 21.90/22.07
% 21.90/22.07
% 21.90/22.07 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 21.90/22.07
% 21.90/22.07 ============ end of search ============
% 21.90/22.07
% 21.90/22.07 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 21.90/22.07
% 21.90/22.07 Process 29123 finished Wed Jun 1 03:03:20 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------