TSTP Solution File: SWB025+2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWB025+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:20:41 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.12s 2.30s
% Output   : Refutation 2.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWB025+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun  1 08:23:30 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.39  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.39  The process was started by sandbox2 on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.39  Wed Jun  1 08:23:30 2022
% 0.19/0.39  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 21685.
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.39  set(auto).
% 0.19/0.39     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.39     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.39     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.39     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.39     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.39     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.39     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.39     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.39     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.39     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.39     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.39     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.39     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.39  clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  formula_list(usable).
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=9.
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.19/0.39  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.19/0.39  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.39     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.39     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.48  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.48  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.48  number of clauses in intial UL: 130
% 0.19/0.48  number of clauses initially in problem: 145
% 0.19/0.48  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 89
% 0.19/0.48  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 70
% 0.19/0.48  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.48  absolute distinct symbol count: 24
% 0.19/0.48     distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.19/0.48     distinct function count: 5
% 0.19/0.48     distinct constant count: 17
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  =========== start of search ===========
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 2.12/2.30  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.12/2.30  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Model 7 [ 1 1 889 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Model 8 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Model 9 [ 1 1 1113 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Model 10 [ 1 2 1187 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Model 11 [ 2 1 2264 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Model 12 [ 1 1 3837 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Model 13 [ 1 1 2392 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Model 14 [ 2 5 54913 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Model 15 [ 1 2 5686 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Model 16 [ 4 2 4676 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Model 17 [ 2 2 2764 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Model 18 [ 2 2 9005 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Model 19 [ 2 2 2024 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Model 20 [ 2 2 4996 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   1.91 sec ----> 181 [hyper,179,14,180] {-} $F.
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Length of proof is 3.  Level of proof is 2.
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.12/2.30  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.12/2.30  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  4 [] {+} -iext(uri_rdf_first,A,B)| -iext(uri_rdf_rest,A,C)| -iext(uri_rdf_first,C,D)| -iext(uri_rdf_rest,C,uri_rdf_nil)| -iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,E,A)| -iext(B,F,G)| -iext(D,G,H)|iext(E,F,H).
% 2.12/2.30  11 [] {+} -iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,A,B)|iext(A,C,D)| -iext(B,D,C).
% 2.12/2.30  14 [] {+} -iext(uri_ex_hasUncle,uri_ex_alice,uri_ex_charly)| -iext(uri_ex_hasCousin,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_alice).
% 2.12/2.30  131 [] {+} iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,uri_ex_hasUncle,$c5).
% 2.12/2.30  132 [] {+} iext(uri_rdf_first,$c5,uri_ex_hasCousin).
% 2.12/2.30  133 [] {+} iext(uri_rdf_rest,$c5,$c4).
% 2.12/2.30  134 [] {+} iext(uri_rdf_first,$c4,uri_ex_hasFather).
% 2.12/2.30  135 [] {+} iext(uri_rdf_rest,$c4,uri_rdf_nil).
% 2.12/2.30  136 [] {+} iext(uri_owl_propertyChainAxiom,uri_ex_hasCousin,$c3).
% 2.12/2.30  137 [] {+} iext(uri_rdf_first,$c3,uri_ex_hasUncle).
% 2.12/2.30  138 [] {+} iext(uri_rdf_rest,$c3,$c2).
% 2.12/2.30  139 [] {+} iext(uri_rdf_first,$c2,$c1).
% 2.12/2.30  140 [] {+} iext(uri_rdf_rest,$c2,uri_rdf_nil).
% 2.12/2.30  141 [] {+} iext(uri_owl_inverseOf,$c1,uri_ex_hasFather).
% 2.12/2.30  142 [] {+} iext(uri_ex_hasFather,uri_ex_alice,uri_ex_dave).
% 2.12/2.30  143 [] {+} iext(uri_ex_hasCousin,uri_ex_alice,uri_ex_bob).
% 2.12/2.30  144 [] {+} iext(uri_ex_hasFather,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_charly).
% 2.12/2.30  145 [] {+} iext(uri_ex_hasUncle,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_dave).
% 2.12/2.30  162 [hyper,141,11,142] {+} iext($c1,uri_ex_dave,uri_ex_alice).
% 2.12/2.30  179 [hyper,144,4,132,133,134,135,131,143] {+} iext(uri_ex_hasUncle,uri_ex_alice,uri_ex_charly).
% 2.12/2.30  180 [hyper,162,4,137,138,139,140,136,145] {+} iext(uri_ex_hasCousin,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_alice).
% 2.12/2.30  181 [hyper,179,14,180] {-} $F.
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.12/2.30  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  ============ end of search ============
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  true clauses given           5      (20.8%)
% 2.12/2.30  false clauses given         19
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30        FALSE     TRUE
% 2.12/2.30    18  0         12
% 2.12/2.30    20  0         14
% 2.12/2.30  tot:  0         26      (100.0% true)
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Model 20 [ 2 2 4996 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.12/2.30  
% 2.12/2.30  Process 21685 finished Wed Jun  1 08:23:32 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------