TSTP Solution File: SWB024+4 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SWB024+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:00:28 EDT 2023

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 11.92s 4.30s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SWB024+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.35  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 18:50:53 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 11.92/4.30  
% 11.92/4.30  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 11.92/4.30  
% 11.92/4.30  Inference rules
% 11.92/4.30  ----------------------
% 11.92/4.30  #Ref     : 0
% 11.92/4.30  #Sup     : 2140
% 11.92/4.30  #Fact    : 0
% 11.92/4.30  #Define  : 0
% 11.92/4.30  #Split   : 94
% 11.92/4.30  #Chain   : 0
% 11.92/4.30  #Close   : 0
% 11.92/4.30  
% 11.92/4.30  Ordering : KBO
% 11.92/4.30  
% 11.92/4.30  Simplification rules
% 11.92/4.30  ----------------------
% 11.92/4.30  #Subsume      : 973
% 11.92/4.30  #Demod        : 1201
% 11.92/4.30  #Tautology    : 720
% 11.92/4.30  #SimpNegUnit  : 42
% 11.92/4.30  #BackRed      : 42
% 11.92/4.30  
% 11.92/4.30  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 11.92/4.30  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 11.92/4.30  
% 11.92/4.30  Timing (in seconds)
% 11.92/4.30  ----------------------
% 11.92/4.31  Preprocessing        : 0.61
% 11.92/4.31  Parsing              : 0.33
% 11.92/4.31  CNF conversion       : 0.05
% 11.92/4.31  Main loop            : 2.59
% 11.92/4.31  Inferencing          : 0.72
% 11.92/4.31  Reduction            : 1.02
% 11.92/4.31  Demodulation         : 0.75
% 11.92/4.31  BG Simplification    : 0.05
% 11.92/4.31  Subsumption          : 0.62
% 11.92/4.31  Abstraction          : 0.04
% 11.92/4.31  MUC search           : 0.00
% 11.92/4.31  Cooper               : 0.00
% 11.92/4.31  Total                : 3.22
% 11.92/4.31  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 11.92/4.31  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 11.92/4.31  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 11.92/4.31  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------