TSTP Solution File: SWB019+3 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWB019+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:20:38 EDT 2022

% Result   : Timeout 300.01s 300.21s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SWB019+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun  1 10:38:10 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.76/0.99  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.76/0.99  The process was started by sandbox2 on n019.cluster.edu,
% 0.76/0.99  Wed Jun  1 10:38:10 2022
% 0.76/0.99  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 20797.
% 0.76/0.99  
% 0.76/0.99  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.76/0.99  set(auto).
% 0.76/0.99     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.76/0.99     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.76/0.99     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.76/0.99     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.76/0.99     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.76/0.99     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.76/0.99     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.76/0.99     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.76/0.99     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.76/0.99     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.76/0.99     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.76/0.99     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.76/0.99     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.76/0.99  clear(print_given).
% 0.76/0.99  
% 0.76/0.99  formula_list(usable).
% 0.76/0.99  
% 0.76/0.99  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=15.
% 0.76/0.99  
% 0.76/0.99  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.76/0.99  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.76/0.99  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.76/0.99  
% 0.76/0.99     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.76/0.99     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.76/0.99     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.76/0.99  
% 0.76/0.99  ------------> process usable:
% 0.76/0.99    Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_owl_complementOf,A,B)|ic(A).
% 0.76/0.99    Following clause subsumed by 2 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_owl_complementOf,A,B)|ic(B).
% 0.76/0.99    Following clause subsumed by 97 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdf_type,A,uri_rdf_Property)|ip(A).
% 0.76/0.99    Following clause subsumed by 96 during input processing: 0 [] {-} iext(uri_rdf_type,A,uri_rdf_Property)| -ip(A).
% 0.76/0.99    Following clause subsumed by 120 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_domain,A,B)| -iext(A,C,D)|icext(B,C).
% 0.76/0.99    Following clause subsumed by 125 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_range,A,B)| -iext(A,C,D)|icext(B,D).
% 0.76/0.99    Following clause subsumed by 128 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,A,B)|ic(A).
% 0.76/0.99    Following clause subsumed by 129 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,A,B)|ic(B).
% 0.76/0.99    Following clause subsumed by 130 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,A,B)| -icext(A,C)|icext(B,C).
% 0.76/0.99    Following clause subsumed by 133 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,A,B)|ip(A).
% 0.76/0.99    Following clause subsumed by 134 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,A,B)|ip(B).
% 0.76/0.99    Following clause subsumed by 135 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,A,B)| -iext(A,C,D)|iext(B,C,D).
% 0.76/0.99    Following clause subsumed by 103 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -lv(A)|ir(A).
% 0.76/0.99  110 back subsumes 25.
% 0.76/0.99  110 back subsumes 16.
% 0.76/0.99  110 back subsumes 10.
% 0.76/0.99  110 back subsumes 5.
% 0.76/0.99  116 back subsumes 55.
% 0.76/0.99  116 back subsumes 46.
% 0.76/0.99  116 back subsumes 40.
% 0.76/0.99  116 back subsumes 37.
% 0.76/0.99  173 back subsumes 170.
% 0.76/0.99  203 back subsumes 193.
% 0.76/0.99  211 back subsumes 204.
% 0.76/0.99  211 back subsumes 194.
% 0.76/0.99  230 back subsumes 227.
% 0.76/0.99  258 back subsumes 248.
% 0.76/0.99  266 back subsumes 259.
% 0.76/0.99  266 back subsumes 249.
% 0.76/0.99  323 back subsumes 300.
% 0.76/0.99  331 back subsumes 311.
% 0.76/0.99  338 back subsumes 294.
% 0.76/0.99  426 back subsumes 403.
% 0.76/0.99  434 back subsumes 414.
% 0.76/0.99  441 back subsumes 397.
% 0.76/0.99  475 back subsumes 461.
% 0.76/0.99  479 back subsumes 466.
% 0.76/0.99  484 back subsumes 455.
% 0.76/0.99  561 back subsumes 547.
% 0.76/0.99  565 back subsumes 552.
% 0.76/0.99  570 back subsumes 541.
% 0.76/0.99  
% 0.76/0.99  ------------> process sos:
% 0.76/0.99    Following clause subsumed by 606 during input processing: 0 [] {-} iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_rdf_type,uri_rdf_Property).
% 0.76/0.99    Following clause subsumed by 644 during input processing: 0 [] {-} iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_rdf_predicate,uri_rdfs_Resource).
% 0.76/0.99  656 back subsumes 589.
% 0.76/0.99  656 back subsumes 154.
% 0.76/0.99  656 back subsumes 109.
% 0.76/0.99  656 back subsumes 103.
% 0.76/0.99  656 back subsumes 100.
% 0.76/0.99  656 back subsumes 99.
% 0.76/0.99  656 back subsumes 95.
% 0.76/0.99  656 back subsumes 94.
% 0.76/0.99  656 back subsumes 93.
% 0.76/0.99  656 back subsumes 83.
% 0.76/0.99  656 back subsumes 79.
% 0.76/0.99  656 back subsumes 78.
% 0.76/0.99  656 back subsumes 71.
% 0.76/0.99  656 back subsumes 70.
% 0.76/0.99  656 back subsumes 68.
% 0.76/0.99  656 back subsumes 8.
% 0.76/0.99  656 back subsumes 6.
% 0.76/0.99  
% 0.76/0.99  ======= end of input processing =======
% 3.53/3.73  
% 3.53/3.73  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.53/3.73  
% 3.53/3.73  
% 3.53/3.73  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 3.53/3.73  
% 3.53/3.73  
% 3.53/3.73  
% 3.53/3.73  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 3.53/3.73  
% 3.53/3.73  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 3.53/3.73  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 3.53/3.73  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 3.53/3.73  number of clauses in intial UL: 542
% 3.53/3.73  number of clauses initially in problem: 618
% 3.53/3.73  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 87
% 3.53/3.73  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 71
% 3.53/3.73  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 3.53/3.73  absolute distinct symbol count: 81
% 3.53/3.73     distinct predicate count: 11
% 3.53/3.73     distinct function count: 18
% 3.53/3.73     distinct constant count: 52
% 3.53/3.73  
% 3.53/3.73  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 3.53/3.73  
% 3.53/3.73  
% 3.53/3.73  
% 3.53/3.73  =========== start of search ===========
% 3.91/4.12  
% 3.91/4.12  
% 3.91/4.12  Changing weight limit from 60 to 27.
% 3.91/4.12  
% 3.91/4.12  Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 3.91/4.12  
% 3.91/4.12  
% 3.91/4.13  Resetting weight limit to 27 after 505 givens.
% 3.91/4.13  
% 3.98/4.19  
% 3.98/4.19  
% 3.98/4.19  Changing weight limit from 27 to 22.
% 3.98/4.19  
% 3.98/4.19  Resetting weight limit to 22 after 510 givens.
% 3.98/4.19  
% 4.15/4.34  
% 4.15/4.34  
% 4.15/4.34  Changing weight limit from 22 to 20.
% 4.15/4.34  
% 4.15/4.34  Resetting weight limit to 20 after 530 givens.
% 4.15/4.34  
% 4.30/4.56  
% 4.30/4.56  
% 4.30/4.56  Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 4.30/4.56  
% 4.30/4.56  Resetting weight limit to 19 after 565 givens.
% 4.30/4.56  
% 4.60/4.84  
% 4.60/4.84  
% 4.60/4.84  Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 4.60/4.84  
% 4.60/4.84  Resetting weight limit to 18 after 610 givens.
% 4.60/4.84  
% 4.68/4.86  
% 4.68/4.86  
% 4.68/4.86  Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 4.68/4.86  
% 4.68/4.86  Resetting weight limit to 17 after 615 givens.
% 4.68/4.86  
% 5.91/6.18  
% 5.91/6.18  
% 5.91/6.18  Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 5.91/6.18  
% 5.91/6.18  Resetting weight limit to 16 after 1010 givens.
% 5.91/6.18  
% 6.11/6.31  
% 6.11/6.31  
% 6.11/6.31  Changing weight limit from 16 to 15.
% 6.11/6.31  
% 6.11/6.31  Resetting weight limit to 15 after 1025 givens.
% 6.11/6.31  
% 6.52/6.71  
% 6.52/6.71  
% 6.52/6.71  Changing weight limit from 15 to 14.
% 6.52/6.71  
% 6.52/6.71  Resetting weight limit to 14 after 1080 givens.
% 6.52/6.71  
% 6.95/7.13  
% 6.95/7.13  
% 6.95/7.13  Changing weight limit from 14 to 13.
% 6.95/7.13  
% 6.95/7.13  Resetting weight limit to 13 after 1125 givens.
% 6.95/7.13  
% 7.92/8.14  
% 7.92/8.14  
% 7.92/8.14  Changing weight limit from 13 to 12.
% 7.92/8.14  
% 7.92/8.14  Resetting weight limit to 12 after 1300 givens.
% 7.92/8.14  
% 53.33/53.52  
% 53.33/53.52  
% 53.33/53.52  Changing weight limit from 12 to 11.
% 53.33/53.52  
% 53.33/53.52  Resetting weight limit to 11 after 4440 givens.
% 53.33/53.52  
% 66.61/66.84  
% 66.61/66.84  
% 66.61/66.84  Changing weight limit from 11 to 10.
% 66.61/66.84  
% 66.61/66.84  Resetting weight limit to 10 after 5210 givens.
% 66.61/66.84  
% 300.01/300.21  Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------