TSTP Solution File: SWB019+2 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWB019+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:36:18 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 36 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 42 ( 15 ~; 13 |; 13 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn; 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X1,X2)
<=> ( ip(X1)
& ip(X2)
& ! [X3,X4] :
~ ( iext(X1,X3,X4)
& iext(X2,X3,X4) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.yImcTyv4gn/E---3.1_2529.p',owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_019_Disjoint_Annotation_Properties,axiom,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_owl_AnnotationProperty)
& iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_rdfs_label)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_skos_altLabel,uri_owl_AnnotationProperty)
& iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_skos_altLabel,uri_rdfs_label)
& iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_skos_altLabel)
& iext(uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_ex_foo,literal_plain(dat_str_foo))
& iext(uri_skos_altLabel,uri_ex_foo,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.yImcTyv4gn/E---3.1_2529.p',testcase_premise_fullish_019_Disjoint_Annotation_Properties) ).
fof(c_0_2,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10] :
( ( ip(X5)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X5,X6) )
& ( ip(X6)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X5,X6) )
& ( ~ iext(X5,X7,X8)
| ~ iext(X6,X7,X8)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X5,X6) )
& ( iext(X9,esk1_2(X9,X10),esk2_2(X9,X10))
| ~ ip(X9)
| ~ ip(X10)
| iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X9,X10) )
& ( iext(X10,esk1_2(X9,X10),esk2_2(X9,X10))
| ~ ip(X9)
| ~ ip(X10)
| iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X9,X10) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(X4,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X1,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_skos_altLabel),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_019_Disjoint_Annotation_Properties]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_skos_altLabel,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_skos_prefLabel,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
iext(uri_skos_altLabel,uri_ex_foo,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_019_Disjoint_Annotation_Properties]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
iext(uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_ex_foo,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_019_Disjoint_Annotation_Properties]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10 % Problem : SWB019+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.06/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 20:19:50 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.yImcTyv4gn/E---3.1_2529.p
% 0.16/0.43 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 2607 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Result found by G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.43 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 2615 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Result found by G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.43 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.43
% 0.16/0.43 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.43 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.43 # Parsed axioms : 2
% 0.16/0.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Initial clauses : 12
% 0.16/0.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 12
% 0.16/0.43 # Processed clauses : 13
% 0.16/0.43 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 13
% 0.16/0.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Generated clauses : 4
% 0.16/0.43 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.16/0.43 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Paramodulations : 4
% 0.16/0.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 13
% 0.16/0.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 9
% 0.16/0.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.16/0.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 8
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3
% 0.16/0.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.16/0.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 512
% 0.16/0.43
% 0.16/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.43 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.43 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 0.16/0.43
% 0.16/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.43 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.16/0.43 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.16/0.43 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.16/0.43 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------