TSTP Solution File: SWB019+2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SWB019+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:01:17 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.57s 0.64s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWB019+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 07:00:50 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.44/0.58 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.57/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.63 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.57/0.63 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.57/0.63 % Transform :cnf
% 0.57/0.63 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.57/0.63 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.57/0.63
% 0.57/0.63 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.57/0.63 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.57/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.64 % File : SWB019+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.57/0.64 % Domain : Semantic Web
% 0.57/0.64 % Problem : Disjoint Annotation Properties
% 0.57/0.64 % Version : [Sch11] axioms : Reduced > Incomplete.
% 0.57/0.64 % English :
% 0.57/0.64
% 0.57/0.64 % Refs : [Sch11] Schneider, M. (2011), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.57/0.64 % Source : [Sch11]
% 0.57/0.64 % Names : 019_Disjoint_Annotation_Properties [Sch11]
% 0.57/0.64
% 0.57/0.64 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.57/0.64 % Rating : 0.00 v6.4.0, 0.25 v6.3.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.25 v6.1.0, 0.00 v5.2.0
% 0.57/0.64 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 2 ( 0 unt; 0 def)
% 0.57/0.64 % Number of atoms : 12 ( 0 equ)
% 0.57/0.64 % Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 6 avg)
% 0.57/0.64 % Number of connectives : 11 ( 1 ~; 0 |; 9 &)
% 0.57/0.64 % ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.57/0.64 % Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 9 avg)
% 0.57/0.64 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.57/0.64 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 0.57/0.64 % Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 9 con; 0-1 aty)
% 0.57/0.64 % Number of variables : 4 ( 4 !; 0 ?)
% 0.57/0.64 % SPC : FOF_UNS_RFO_NEQ
% 0.57/0.64
% 0.57/0.64 % Comments :
% 0.57/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.64 fof(owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith,axiom,
% 0.57/0.64 ! [P1,P2] :
% 0.57/0.64 ( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,P1,P2)
% 0.57/0.64 <=> ( ip(P1)
% 0.57/0.64 & ip(P2)
% 0.57/0.64 & ! [X,Y] :
% 0.57/0.64 ~ ( iext(P1,X,Y)
% 0.57/0.64 & iext(P2,X,Y) ) ) ) ).
% 0.57/0.64
% 0.57/0.64 fof(testcase_premise_fullish_019_Disjoint_Annotation_Properties,axiom,
% 0.57/0.64 ( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_owl_AnnotationProperty)
% 0.57/0.64 & iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_rdfs_label)
% 0.57/0.64 & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_skos_altLabel,uri_owl_AnnotationProperty)
% 0.57/0.64 & iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_skos_altLabel,uri_rdfs_label)
% 0.57/0.64 & iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_skos_altLabel)
% 0.57/0.64 & iext(uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_ex_foo,literal_plain(dat_str_foo))
% 0.57/0.64 & iext(uri_skos_altLabel,uri_ex_foo,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)) ) ).
% 0.57/0.64
% 0.57/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.64 % Proof found
% 0.57/0.64 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.57/0.64 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.57/0.64 %ClaNum:12(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.57/0.64 %VarNum:32(SingletonVarNum:12)
% 0.57/0.64 %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.57/0.64 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.57/0.64 %SharedTerms:17
% 0.57/0.64 [1]P1(a1,a8,a9)
% 0.57/0.64 [2]P1(a10,a8,a2)
% 0.57/0.64 [3]P1(a10,a9,a2)
% 0.57/0.64 [4]P1(a11,a8,a12)
% 0.57/0.64 [5]P1(a11,a9,a12)
% 0.57/0.64 [6]P1(a8,a3,f5(a4))
% 0.57/0.64 [7]P1(a9,a3,f5(a4))
% 0.57/0.64 [8]P2(x81)+~P1(a1,x82,x81)
% 0.57/0.64 [9]P2(x91)+~P1(a1,x91,x92)
% 0.57/0.64 [12]~P1(x121,x122,x123)+~P1(x124,x122,x123)+~P1(a1,x124,x121)
% 0.57/0.64 [10]~P2(x101)+~P2(x102)+P1(x102,f6(x101,x102),f7(x101,x102))+P1(a1,x101,x102)
% 0.57/0.64 [11]~P2(x112)+~P2(x111)+P1(x111,f6(x111,x112),f7(x111,x112))+P1(a1,x111,x112)
% 0.57/0.64 %EqnAxiom
% 0.57/0.64
% 0.57/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.64 cnf(15,plain,
% 0.57/0.64 ($false),
% 0.57/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,6,7,9,8,12]),
% 0.57/0.64 ['proof']).
% 0.57/0.64 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.57/0.64 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------