TSTP Solution File: SWB019+2 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : SWB019+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:00:25 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.96s 1.73s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.96s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 16
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 5 unt; 14 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 20 ( 7 ~; 3 |; 9 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 9 ( 5 >; 4 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 (; 9 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ iext > ip > #nlpp > literal_plain > uri_skos_prefLabel > uri_skos_altLabel > uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf > uri_rdfs_label > uri_rdf_type > uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith > uri_owl_AnnotationProperty > uri_ex_foo > dat_str_foo > #skF_2 > #skF_1
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(uri_rdf_type,type,
uri_rdf_type: $i ).
tff(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,type,
uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf: $i ).
tff(uri_skos_altLabel,type,
uri_skos_altLabel: $i ).
tff(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,type,
uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith: $i ).
tff(ip,type,
ip: $i > $o ).
tff(dat_str_foo,type,
dat_str_foo: $i ).
tff(uri_rdfs_label,type,
uri_rdfs_label: $i ).
tff(uri_owl_AnnotationProperty,type,
uri_owl_AnnotationProperty: $i ).
tff(iext,type,
iext: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(uri_skos_prefLabel,type,
uri_skos_prefLabel: $i ).
tff('#skF_2',type,
'#skF_2': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(uri_ex_foo,type,
uri_ex_foo: $i ).
tff(literal_plain,type,
literal_plain: $i > $i ).
tff('#skF_1',type,
'#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(f_49,axiom,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_owl_AnnotationProperty)
& iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_rdfs_label)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_skos_altLabel,uri_owl_AnnotationProperty)
& iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_skos_altLabel,uri_rdfs_label)
& iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_skos_altLabel)
& iext(uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_ex_foo,literal_plain(dat_str_foo))
& iext(uri_skos_altLabel,uri_ex_foo,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_019_Disjoint_Annotation_Properties) ).
tff(f_36,axiom,
! [P1,P2] :
( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,P1,P2)
<=> ( ip(P1)
& ip(P2)
& ! [X,Y] :
~ ( iext(P1,X,Y)
& iext(P2,X,Y) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith) ).
tff(c_16,plain,
iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_skos_altLabel),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_49]) ).
tff(c_14,plain,
iext(uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_ex_foo,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_49]) ).
tff(c_12,plain,
iext(uri_skos_altLabel,uri_ex_foo,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_49]) ).
tff(c_35,plain,
! [P2_13,X_14,Y_15,P1_16] :
( ~ iext(P2_13,X_14,Y_15)
| ~ iext(P1_16,X_14,Y_15)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,P1_16,P2_13) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_36]) ).
tff(c_105,plain,
! [P1_26] :
( ~ iext(P1_26,uri_ex_foo,literal_plain(dat_str_foo))
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,P1_26,uri_skos_altLabel) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_35]) ).
tff(c_111,plain,
~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_skos_prefLabel,uri_skos_altLabel),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_105]) ).
tff(c_116,plain,
$false,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_16,c_111]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14 % Problem : SWB019+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.15 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 18:40:39 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 2.96/1.73 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.96/1.73
% 2.96/1.73 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.96/1.76
% 2.96/1.76 Inference rules
% 2.96/1.76 ----------------------
% 2.96/1.76 #Ref : 0
% 2.96/1.76 #Sup : 22
% 2.96/1.76 #Fact : 0
% 2.96/1.76 #Define : 0
% 2.96/1.76 #Split : 0
% 2.96/1.76 #Chain : 0
% 2.96/1.76 #Close : 0
% 2.96/1.76
% 2.96/1.76 Ordering : KBO
% 2.96/1.76
% 2.96/1.76 Simplification rules
% 2.96/1.76 ----------------------
% 2.96/1.76 #Subsume : 2
% 2.96/1.76 #Demod : 1
% 2.96/1.76 #Tautology : 0
% 2.96/1.76 #SimpNegUnit : 0
% 2.96/1.76 #BackRed : 0
% 2.96/1.76
% 2.96/1.76 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.96/1.76 #Strategies tried : 1
% 2.96/1.76
% 2.96/1.76 Timing (in seconds)
% 2.96/1.76 ----------------------
% 2.96/1.76 Preprocessing : 0.41
% 2.96/1.76 Parsing : 0.23
% 2.96/1.76 CNF conversion : 0.03
% 2.96/1.76 Main loop : 0.27
% 2.96/1.76 Inferencing : 0.12
% 2.96/1.76 Reduction : 0.06
% 2.96/1.76 Demodulation : 0.05
% 2.96/1.76 BG Simplification : 0.01
% 2.96/1.76 Subsumption : 0.05
% 2.96/1.76 Abstraction : 0.01
% 2.96/1.76 MUC search : 0.00
% 2.96/1.76 Cooper : 0.00
% 2.96/1.76 Total : 0.72
% 2.96/1.76 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 2.96/1.76 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 2.96/1.76 Index Matching : 0.00
% 2.96/1.76 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------