TSTP Solution File: SWB018+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : SWB018+1 : TPTP v5.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Feb 15 23:49:02 EST 2011
% Result : Theorem 0.27s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 28 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 102 ( 6 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 119 ( 45 ~; 43 |; 27 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 53 ( 4 sgn 36 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X1,X2)
<=> ( ip(X1)
& ic(X2)
& ! [X3,X4] :
( iext(X1,X3,X4)
=> icext(X2,X3) ) ) ),
file('/tmp/tmpNtvMUK/sel_SWB018+1.p_1',owl_rdfsext_domain) ).
fof(19,axiom,
! [X3,X4] :
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X3,X4)
<=> X3 = X4 ),
file('/tmp/tmpNtvMUK/sel_SWB018+1.p_1',owl_eqdis_sameas) ).
fof(20,axiom,
! [X3,X2] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X3,X2)
<=> icext(X2,X3) ),
file('/tmp/tmpNtvMUK/sel_SWB018+1.p_1',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(21,conjecture,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_Person),
file('/tmp/tmpNtvMUK/sel_SWB018+1.p_1',testcase_conclusion_fullish_018_Modified_Logical_Vocabulary_Semantics) ).
fof(22,axiom,
( iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_Person)
& iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u) ),
file('/tmp/tmpNtvMUK/sel_SWB018+1.p_1',testcase_premise_fullish_018_Modified_Logical_Vocabulary_Semantics) ).
fof(23,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_Person),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[21]) ).
fof(24,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_Person),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[23,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(25,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X1,X2)
| ( ip(X1)
& ic(X2)
& ! [X3,X4] :
( ~ iext(X1,X3,X4)
| icext(X2,X3) ) ) )
& ( ~ ip(X1)
| ~ ic(X2)
| ? [X3,X4] :
( iext(X1,X3,X4)
& ~ icext(X2,X3) )
| iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X1,X2) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
fof(26,plain,
! [X5,X6] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X5,X6)
| ( ip(X5)
& ic(X6)
& ! [X7,X8] :
( ~ iext(X5,X7,X8)
| icext(X6,X7) ) ) )
& ( ~ ip(X5)
| ~ ic(X6)
| ? [X9,X10] :
( iext(X5,X9,X10)
& ~ icext(X6,X9) )
| iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X5,X6) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[25]) ).
fof(27,plain,
! [X5,X6] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X5,X6)
| ( ip(X5)
& ic(X6)
& ! [X7,X8] :
( ~ iext(X5,X7,X8)
| icext(X6,X7) ) ) )
& ( ~ ip(X5)
| ~ ic(X6)
| ( iext(X5,esk1_2(X5,X6),esk2_2(X5,X6))
& ~ icext(X6,esk1_2(X5,X6)) )
| iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X5,X6) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[26]) ).
fof(28,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
( ( ( ( ~ iext(X5,X7,X8)
| icext(X6,X7) )
& ip(X5)
& ic(X6) )
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X5,X6) )
& ( ~ ip(X5)
| ~ ic(X6)
| ( iext(X5,esk1_2(X5,X6),esk2_2(X5,X6))
& ~ icext(X6,esk1_2(X5,X6)) )
| iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X5,X6) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[27]) ).
fof(29,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
( ( ~ iext(X5,X7,X8)
| icext(X6,X7)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X5,X6) )
& ( ip(X5)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X5,X6) )
& ( ic(X6)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X5,X6) )
& ( iext(X5,esk1_2(X5,X6),esk2_2(X5,X6))
| ~ ip(X5)
| ~ ic(X6)
| iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X5,X6) )
& ( ~ icext(X6,esk1_2(X5,X6))
| ~ ip(X5)
| ~ ic(X6)
| iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X5,X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[28]) ).
cnf(34,plain,
( icext(X2,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(X1,X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[29]) ).
fof(88,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X3,X4)
| X3 = X4 )
& ( X3 != X4
| iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X3,X4) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[19]) ).
fof(89,plain,
! [X5,X6] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X5,X6)
| X5 = X6 )
& ( X5 != X6
| iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X5,X6) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[88]) ).
cnf(90,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2)
| X1 != X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[89]) ).
fof(92,plain,
! [X3,X2] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X3,X2)
| icext(X2,X3) )
& ( ~ icext(X2,X3)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X3,X2) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[20]) ).
fof(93,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
| icext(X5,X4) )
& ( ~ icext(X5,X4)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[92]) ).
cnf(94,plain,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)
| ~ icext(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[93]) ).
cnf(96,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_Person),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[24]) ).
cnf(98,plain,
iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_Person),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[22]) ).
cnf(116,plain,
iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X1),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[90,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(132,plain,
( icext(uri_ex_Person,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[34,98,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(174,plain,
icext(uri_ex_Person,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[132,116,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(178,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_ex_Person),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[94,174,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(184,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[96,178,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(185,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[184,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(186,negated_conjecture,
$false,
185,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWB/SWB018+1.p
% --creating new selector for [SWB001+0.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpNtvMUK/sel_SWB018+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SWB018+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWB/SWB018+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWB/SWB018+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------