TSTP Solution File: SWB018+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SWB018+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:02:01 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.27s 1.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   81 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   15 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   82 (  34   ~;  30   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   54 (  12 sgn  33   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_018_Modified_Logical_Vocabulary_Semantics,conjecture,
    iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_Person),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',testcase_conclusion_fullish_018_Modified_Logical_Vocabulary_Semantics) ).

fof(owl_eqdis_sameas,axiom,
    ! [X4,X7] :
      ( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X4,X7)
    <=> X4 = X7 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_eqdis_sameas) ).

fof(owl_char_reflexive,axiom,
    ! [X2] :
      ( icext(uri_owl_ReflexiveProperty,X2)
    <=> ( ip(X2)
        & ! [X4] : iext(X2,X4,X4) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_char_reflexive) ).

fof(simple_iext_property,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( iext(X2,X1,X3)
     => ip(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',simple_iext_property) ).

fof(testcase_premise_fullish_018_Modified_Logical_Vocabulary_Semantics,axiom,
    ( iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_Person)
    & iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',testcase_premise_fullish_018_Modified_Logical_Vocabulary_Semantics) ).

fof(owl_rdfsext_domain,axiom,
    ! [X2,X5] :
      ( iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X2,X5)
    <=> ( ip(X2)
        & ic(X5)
        & ! [X4,X7] :
            ( iext(X2,X4,X7)
           => icext(X5,X4) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_rdfsext_domain) ).

fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
    <=> icext(X5,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_cext_def) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_Person),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_018_Modified_Logical_Vocabulary_Semantics]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X8,X9,X8,X9] :
      ( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X8,X9)
        | X8 = X9 )
      & ( X8 != X9
        | iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X8,X9) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_sameas])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X5] :
      ( ( ip(X5)
        | ~ icext(uri_owl_ReflexiveProperty,X5) )
      & ( iext(X5,X6,X6)
        | ~ icext(uri_owl_ReflexiveProperty,X5) )
      & ( ~ ip(X5)
        | ~ iext(X5,esk170_1(X5),esk170_1(X5))
        | icext(uri_owl_ReflexiveProperty,X5) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_char_reflexive])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ iext(X5,X4,X6)
      | ip(X5) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[simple_iext_property])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_Person),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_018_Modified_Logical_Vocabulary_Semantics]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X8,X9,X10,X11,X8,X9] :
      ( ( ip(X8)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X8,X9) )
      & ( ic(X9)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X8,X9) )
      & ( ~ iext(X8,X10,X11)
        | icext(X9,X10)
        | ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X8,X9) )
      & ( iext(X8,esk105_2(X8,X9),esk106_2(X8,X9))
        | ~ ip(X8)
        | ~ ic(X9)
        | iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X8,X9) )
      & ( ~ icext(X9,esk105_2(X8,X9))
        | ~ ip(X8)
        | ~ ic(X9)
        | iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X8,X9) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_rdfsext_domain])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( icext(uri_owl_ReflexiveProperty,X1)
    | ~ iext(X1,esk170_1(X1),esk170_1(X1))
    | ~ ip(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ip(X1)
    | ~ iext(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_Person),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    uri_ex_u = uri_ex_w,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X6,X7,X6,X7] :
      ( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X6,X7)
        | icext(X7,X6) )
      & ( ~ icext(X7,X6)
        | iext(uri_rdf_type,X6,X7) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( icext(X2,X3)
    | ~ iext(uri_rdfs_domain,X1,X2)
    | ~ iext(X1,X3,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_Person),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_018_Modified_Logical_Vocabulary_Semantics]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( icext(uri_owl_ReflexiveProperty,X1)
    | ~ iext(X1,esk170_1(X1),esk170_1(X1)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X1),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_Person),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)
    | ~ icext(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( icext(uri_ex_Person,X1)
    | ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( iext(X1,X2,X2)
    | ~ icext(uri_owl_ReflexiveProperty,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    icext(uri_owl_ReflexiveProperty,uri_owl_sameAs),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ icext(uri_ex_Person,uri_ex_w),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    icext(uri_ex_Person,X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWB018+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun  1 10:43:37 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.27/1.45  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.27/1.45  # Preprocessing time       : 0.089 s
% 0.27/1.45  
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof found!
% 0.27/1.45  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.27/1.45  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object total steps             : 33
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object clause steps            : 19
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object formula steps           : 14
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object conjectures             : 7
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 4
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 10
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 7
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object generating inferences   : 5
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 7
% 0.27/1.45  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.27/1.45  # Parsed axioms                        : 560
% 0.27/1.45  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # Initial clauses                      : 1269
% 0.27/1.45  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 111
% 0.27/1.45  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 1158
% 0.27/1.45  # Processed clauses                    : 1849
% 0.27/1.45  # ...of these trivial                  : 152
% 0.27/1.45  # ...subsumed                          : 200
% 0.27/1.45  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1497
% 0.27/1.45  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 16
% 0.27/1.45  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # Backward-subsumed                    : 23
% 0.27/1.45  # Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 0.27/1.45  # Generated clauses                    : 51771
% 0.27/1.45  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 51384
% 0.27/1.45  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 90
% 0.27/1.45  # Paramodulations                      : 51743
% 0.27/1.45  # Factorizations                       : 12
% 0.27/1.45  # Equation resolutions                 : 16
% 0.27/1.45  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1454
% 0.27/1.45  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 337
% 0.27/1.45  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/1.45  #    Negative unit clauses             : 15
% 0.27/1.45  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1102
% 0.27/1.45  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 50492
% 0.27/1.45  # ...number of literals in the above   : 451103
% 0.27/1.45  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # Current number of archived clauses   : 28
% 0.27/1.45  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 726911
% 0.27/1.45  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 63347
% 0.27/1.45  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 284
% 0.27/1.45  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 38879
% 0.27/1.45  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 16
% 0.27/1.45  # BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.27/1.45  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1201676
% 0.27/1.45  
% 0.27/1.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/1.45  # User time                : 0.926 s
% 0.27/1.45  # System time              : 0.032 s
% 0.27/1.45  # Total time               : 0.958 s
% 0.27/1.45  # Maximum resident set size: 64916 pages
% 0.28/23.50  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.28/23.52  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.52  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.52  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.52  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.53  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.53  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.53  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.53  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.54  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.54  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.55  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.55  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.55  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.55  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.56  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.56  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.56  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.56  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.57  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------