TSTP Solution File: SWB017+2 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SWB017+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:16:28 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.38s 0.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.38s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 48 ( 6 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 51 ( 22 ~; 16 |; 10 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 0 sgn 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions,conjecture,
iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_differentfrom,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X1,X2)
<=> X1 != X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',owl_eqdis_differentfrom) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith,axiom,
! [X3,X4] :
( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X3,X4)
<=> ( ip(X3)
& ip(X4)
& ! [X1,X2] :
~ ( iext(X3,X1,X2)
& iext(X4,X1,X2) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions,axiom,
( iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_rdf_type)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c)
& iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_c) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X1,X2)
<=> X1 != X2 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_differentfrom]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X5,X6] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X5,X6)
| X5 != X6 )
& ( X5 = X6
| iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X5,X6) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9,X10,X11,X12] :
( ( ip(X7)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X7,X8) )
& ( ip(X8)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X7,X8) )
& ( ~ iext(X7,X9,X10)
| ~ iext(X8,X9,X10)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X7,X8) )
& ( iext(X11,esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12))
| ~ ip(X11)
| ~ ip(X12)
| iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X11,X12) )
& ( iext(X12,esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12))
| ~ ip(X11)
| ~ ip(X12)
| iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X11,X12) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_propertydisjointwith])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_u),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( X1 = X2
| iext(uri_owl_differentFrom,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(X4,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,X1,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
iext(uri_owl_propertyDisjointWith,uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_rdf_type),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
uri_ex_w = uri_ex_u,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_c),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
iext(uri_ex_notInstanceOf,uri_ex_u,uri_ex_c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_017_Built_in_Based_Definitions]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : SWB017+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.37 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37 % DateTime : Sat May 18 14:09:53 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.38/0.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.38/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.38/0.55 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.38/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.38/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.38/0.55 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.38/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.55 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.55 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.55 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 15651 completed with status 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.38/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.38/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.38/0.55 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.38/0.55 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.38/0.55 # Search class: FGHSF-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.38/0.55 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.38/0.55 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.55 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.55 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.55 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.55 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 15657 completed with status 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.38/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.38/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.38/0.55 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.38/0.55 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.38/0.55 # Search class: FGHSF-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.38/0.55 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.38/0.55 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.55 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.38/0.55 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.38/0.55
% 0.38/0.55 # Proof found!
% 0.38/0.55 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.38/0.55 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.38/0.55 # Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.38/0.55 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Initial clauses : 11
% 0.38/0.55 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Initial clauses in saturation : 11
% 0.38/0.55 # Processed clauses : 27
% 0.38/0.55 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.38/0.55 # ...remaining for further processing : 26
% 0.38/0.55 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.38/0.55 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.38/0.55 # Generated clauses : 6
% 0.38/0.55 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7
% 0.38/0.55 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Paramodulations : 5
% 0.38/0.55 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # NegExts : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.38/0.55 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.38/0.55 # ...of those cached : 1
% 0.38/0.55 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.55 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.55 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.55 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.55 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.55 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.55 # Current number of processed clauses : 12
% 0.38/0.55 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.38/0.55 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.38/0.55 # Non-unit-clauses : 5
% 0.38/0.55 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.38/0.55 # ...number of literals in the above : 8
% 0.38/0.55 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Current number of archived clauses : 13
% 0.38/0.55 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7
% 0.38/0.55 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.38/0.55 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.38/0.55 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.38/0.55 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.38/0.55 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Termbank termtop insertions : 645
% 0.38/0.55 # Search garbage collected termcells : 133
% 0.38/0.55
% 0.38/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.38/0.55 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.38/0.55 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.38/0.55 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.38/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.38/0.55
% 0.38/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.38/0.55 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.38/0.55 # System time : 0.012 s
% 0.38/0.55 # Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.38/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.38/0.55 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.38/0.55 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------